Optimizing lung cancer radiation therapy: A systematic review of multifactorial risk assessment for radiation-induced lung toxicity

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Rayan Bensenane , Sylvie Helfre , Kim Cao , Matthieu Carton , Laurence Champion , Nicolas Girard , Matthieu Glorion , Thibaut Vieira , Waisse Waissi , Gilles Crehange , Arnaud Beddok
{"title":"Optimizing lung cancer radiation therapy: A systematic review of multifactorial risk assessment for radiation-induced lung toxicity","authors":"Rayan Bensenane ,&nbsp;Sylvie Helfre ,&nbsp;Kim Cao ,&nbsp;Matthieu Carton ,&nbsp;Laurence Champion ,&nbsp;Nicolas Girard ,&nbsp;Matthieu Glorion ,&nbsp;Thibaut Vieira ,&nbsp;Waisse Waissi ,&nbsp;Gilles Crehange ,&nbsp;Arnaud Beddok","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Radiation therapy (RT) is essential in treating advanced lung cancer, but may lead to radiation pneumonitis (RP). This systematic review investigates the use of pulmonary function tests (PFT) and other parameters to predict and mitigate RP, thereby improving RT planning.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review sifted through PubMed and on BioMed Central, targeting articles from September 2005 to December 2022 containing the keywords: Lung Cancer, Radiotherapy, and pulmonary function test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 1153 articles, 80 were included. RP was assessed using CTCAEv.4 in 30 % of these. Six studies evaluated post-RT quality of life in lung cancer patients, reporting no decline. Patients with RP and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) generally exhibited poorer overall survival. Notably, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) declined 24 months post-RT, while forced vital capacity (FVC) stayed stable. In the majority of studies, age over 60, tumors located in the lower part of the lung, and low FEV1 before RT were associated with a higher risk of RP. Dosimetric factors (V5, V20, MLD) and metabolic imaging emerged as significant predictors of RP risk. A clinical checklist blending patient and tumor characteristics, PFT results, and dosimetric criteria was proposed for assessing RP risk before RT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The review reveals the multifactorial nature of RP development following RT in lung cancer. This approach should guide individualized management and calls for a prospective study to validate these findings and enhance RP prevention strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224000021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Radiation therapy (RT) is essential in treating advanced lung cancer, but may lead to radiation pneumonitis (RP). This systematic review investigates the use of pulmonary function tests (PFT) and other parameters to predict and mitigate RP, thereby improving RT planning.

Methods

A systematic review sifted through PubMed and on BioMed Central, targeting articles from September 2005 to December 2022 containing the keywords: Lung Cancer, Radiotherapy, and pulmonary function test.

Results

From 1153 articles, 80 were included. RP was assessed using CTCAEv.4 in 30 % of these. Six studies evaluated post-RT quality of life in lung cancer patients, reporting no decline. Patients with RP and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) generally exhibited poorer overall survival. Notably, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) declined 24 months post-RT, while forced vital capacity (FVC) stayed stable. In the majority of studies, age over 60, tumors located in the lower part of the lung, and low FEV1 before RT were associated with a higher risk of RP. Dosimetric factors (V5, V20, MLD) and metabolic imaging emerged as significant predictors of RP risk. A clinical checklist blending patient and tumor characteristics, PFT results, and dosimetric criteria was proposed for assessing RP risk before RT.

Conclusion

The review reveals the multifactorial nature of RP development following RT in lung cancer. This approach should guide individualized management and calls for a prospective study to validate these findings and enhance RP prevention strategies.

优化肺癌放射治疗:辐射诱发肺部毒性的多因素风险评估系统综述
背景放射治疗(RT)是治疗晚期肺癌的关键,但可能导致放射性肺炎(RP)。本系统综述调查了肺功能测试(PFT)和其他参数在预测和减轻 RP 方面的应用,从而改进 RT 计划。方法通过 PubMed 和 BioMed Central 网站筛选系统综述,目标是 2005 年 9 月至 2022 年 12 月期间包含关键字的文章:结果从 1153 篇文章中,纳入了 80 篇。其中30%的文章使用CTCAEv.4对放疗质量进行了评估。六项研究对肺癌患者放疗后的生活质量进行了评估,结果显示没有下降。RP和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的总体生存率普遍较低。值得注意的是,一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1)和一氧化碳肺弥散能力(DLCO)在 RT 后 24 个月有所下降,而用力肺活量(FVC)保持稳定。在大多数研究中,年龄超过 60 岁、肿瘤位于肺下部和 RT 前 FEV1 低与 RP 风险较高有关。剂量测定因素(V5、V20、MLD)和代谢成像是预测 RP 风险的重要因素。结论该综述揭示了肺癌 RT 后 RP 发生的多因素性质。这种方法应能指导个体化管理,并需要进行前瞻性研究来验证这些发现并加强 RP 预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信