Applying artificial intelligence to clinical decision support in mental health: What have we learned?

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Grace Golden , Christina Popescu , Sonia Israel , Kelly Perlman , Caitrin Armstrong , Robert Fratila , Myriam Tanguay-Sela , David Benrimoh
{"title":"Applying artificial intelligence to clinical decision support in mental health: What have we learned?","authors":"Grace Golden ,&nbsp;Christina Popescu ,&nbsp;Sonia Israel ,&nbsp;Kelly Perlman ,&nbsp;Caitrin Armstrong ,&nbsp;Robert Fratila ,&nbsp;Myriam Tanguay-Sela ,&nbsp;David Benrimoh","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) augmented with artificial intelligence (AI) models are emerging as potentially valuable tools in healthcare. Despite their promise, the development and implementation of these systems typically encounter several barriers, hindering the potential for widespread adoption. Here we present a case study of a recently developed AI-CDSS, Aifred Health, aimed at supporting the selection and management of treatment in major depressive disorder. We consider both the principles espoused during development and testing of this AI-CDSS, as well as the practical solutions developed to facilitate implementation. We also propose recommendations to consider throughout the building, validation, training, and implementation process of an AI-CDSS. These recommendations include: identifying the key problem, selecting the type of machine learning approach based on this problem, determining the type of data required, determining the format required for a CDSS to provide clinical utility, gathering physician and patient feedback, and validating the tool across multiple settings. Finally, we explore the potential benefits of widespread adoption of these systems, while balancing these against implementation challenges such as ensuring systems do not disrupt the clinical workflow, and designing systems in a manner that engenders trust on the part of end users.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100844"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) augmented with artificial intelligence (AI) models are emerging as potentially valuable tools in healthcare. Despite their promise, the development and implementation of these systems typically encounter several barriers, hindering the potential for widespread adoption. Here we present a case study of a recently developed AI-CDSS, Aifred Health, aimed at supporting the selection and management of treatment in major depressive disorder. We consider both the principles espoused during development and testing of this AI-CDSS, as well as the practical solutions developed to facilitate implementation. We also propose recommendations to consider throughout the building, validation, training, and implementation process of an AI-CDSS. These recommendations include: identifying the key problem, selecting the type of machine learning approach based on this problem, determining the type of data required, determining the format required for a CDSS to provide clinical utility, gathering physician and patient feedback, and validating the tool across multiple settings. Finally, we explore the potential benefits of widespread adoption of these systems, while balancing these against implementation challenges such as ensuring systems do not disrupt the clinical workflow, and designing systems in a manner that engenders trust on the part of end users.

将人工智能应用于精神卫生临床决策支持:我们学到了什么?
使用人工智能(AI)模型增强的临床决策支持系统(CDSS)正在成为医疗保健领域具有潜在价值的工具。尽管这些系统前景广阔,但在开发和实施过程中通常会遇到一些障碍,阻碍了其被广泛采用的可能性。在此,我们将对最近开发的人工智能 CDSS Aifred Health 进行案例研究,该系统旨在为重度抑郁障碍的治疗选择和管理提供支持。我们既考虑了该人工智能 CDSS 在开发和测试过程中秉持的原则,也考虑了为促进实施而开发的实用解决方案。我们还提出了一些建议,供在构建、验证、培训和实施 AI-CDSS 的整个过程中参考。这些建议包括:确定关键问题,根据该问题选择机器学习方法的类型,确定所需数据的类型,确定 CDSS 提供临床实用性所需的格式,收集医生和患者的反馈,以及在多种环境下验证该工具。最后,我们探讨了广泛采用这些系统的潜在益处,同时将这些益处与实施过程中遇到的挑战进行了平衡,例如确保系统不会扰乱临床工作流程,以及系统的设计方式能够赢得最终用户的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信