Intrathecal Injection of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Versus a Mixture of Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine in Lower Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Q2 Medicine
Adel Ali Hassan, Amira Seleem Saleh, Maged Salah Mohamed, M. S. Khalil
{"title":"Intrathecal Injection of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Versus a Mixture of Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine in Lower Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Adel Ali Hassan, Amira Seleem Saleh, Maged Salah Mohamed, M. S. Khalil","doi":"10.5812/aapm-142719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bupivacaine hydrochloride is widely used as the primary drug for spinal anesthesia. Objectives: This research aimed to evaluate the intrathecal administration of both isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine (HB) in lower abdominal surgery. Methods: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was conducted on 50 patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to II, scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia. The patients were allocated randomly into two groups of similar size. Group A (control group) received 20 mg HB 0.5% intrathecally. Group B (case group) received 10 mg HB 0.5% and 10 mg isobaric bupivacaine (IB) 0.5%. Results: There was a significant decline in heart rate and mean arterial pressure in Group A compared to Group B (P < 0.05). Group A had a significantly greater sensory level at 10 and 20 minutes than Group B (P = 0.008 and 0.006, respectively). Group A had an earlier duration in reaching Bromage 3 and the first need for analgesia, compared to group B (P = 0.001 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusions: In lower abdominal surgery, the intrathecal administration of HB with IB increased hemodynamic stability and duration of both sensory and motor blockade but with slower recovery from anesthesia compared to HB alone.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"52 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-142719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bupivacaine hydrochloride is widely used as the primary drug for spinal anesthesia. Objectives: This research aimed to evaluate the intrathecal administration of both isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine (HB) in lower abdominal surgery. Methods: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was conducted on 50 patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to II, scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia. The patients were allocated randomly into two groups of similar size. Group A (control group) received 20 mg HB 0.5% intrathecally. Group B (case group) received 10 mg HB 0.5% and 10 mg isobaric bupivacaine (IB) 0.5%. Results: There was a significant decline in heart rate and mean arterial pressure in Group A compared to Group B (P < 0.05). Group A had a significantly greater sensory level at 10 and 20 minutes than Group B (P = 0.008 and 0.006, respectively). Group A had an earlier duration in reaching Bromage 3 and the first need for analgesia, compared to group B (P = 0.001 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusions: In lower abdominal surgery, the intrathecal administration of HB with IB increased hemodynamic stability and duration of both sensory and motor blockade but with slower recovery from anesthesia compared to HB alone.
在下腹部手术中鞘内注射高压布比卡因与高压和等压布比卡因混合物:随机对照试验
背景:盐酸布比卡因被广泛用作脊髓麻醉的主要药物。研究目的本研究旨在评估等压和高压布比卡因(HB)在下腹部手术中的鞘内给药情况。方法对 50 名美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅰ级至Ⅱ级、计划在脊髓麻醉下进行下腹部手术的患者进行了随机、对照、双盲试验。患者被随机分配到两组,每组人数相近。A 组(对照组)鞘内注射 20 毫克 0.5% HB。B组(病例组)接受 10 毫克 0.5% HB 和 10 毫克 0.5% 等压布比卡因(IB)。结果:与 B 组相比,A 组的心率和平均动脉压明显下降(P < 0.05)。A 组在 10 分钟和 20 分钟时的感觉水平明显高于 B 组(P = 0.008 和 0.006)。与 B 组相比,A 组达到 Bromage 3 和首次需要镇痛的时间更早(P = 0.001 和 0.003)。结论在下腹部手术中,鞘内注射 HB 和 IB 可增加血流动力学的稳定性,延长感觉和运动阻滞的持续时间,但与单独注射 HB 相比,麻醉恢复较慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信