The application of force plates and the community of experts in Russian dissertations for 2016–2022

O. Kubryak, Anastasia I. Mezenchuk, Svetlana A. Pak
{"title":"The application of force plates and the community of experts in Russian dissertations for 2016–2022","authors":"O. Kubryak, Anastasia I. Mezenchuk, Svetlana A. Pak","doi":"10.17816/430299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 90 Russian dissertation studies with the usage of force plates, which were performed in 48 scientific organizations, more than 20 thousand healthy participants and patients took part. They were supervised by 89 specialists, who, together with 167 official opponents and representatives of 43 leading organizations, can be classified as the corps of experts in this scientific field. The appropriate list is presented for the first time. \nDissertation samples were distributed manly between clinical specialties (over 70%) and pedagogical specialties (approximately 20%). 14 different models (brands) of force plates were used in the dissertations. 6 of them were foreign, and the most frequently used ― in 55 dissertations ― were Russian force plates of three brands registered as medical devices, of which only one was an officially approved Measurement Device. \nIn the analysis of the data obtained using the force plates, the dissertators applied 30 quantitative indices, of which \"length\", \"speed\" and \"area\" of the statokinesiogram were the most frequently used. \nThe averaged characteristics of candidate and doctoral works in terms of the number of participants or patients included in the study, the number of sources, conclusions, etc. were represented. Interpretation of quantitative characteristics and content of dissertation works concerns comparison with the data of the analysis for the previous decade, and helps to reveal the features and the prospects of the stabilometry application.","PeriodicalId":226051,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/430299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 90 Russian dissertation studies with the usage of force plates, which were performed in 48 scientific organizations, more than 20 thousand healthy participants and patients took part. They were supervised by 89 specialists, who, together with 167 official opponents and representatives of 43 leading organizations, can be classified as the corps of experts in this scientific field. The appropriate list is presented for the first time. Dissertation samples were distributed manly between clinical specialties (over 70%) and pedagogical specialties (approximately 20%). 14 different models (brands) of force plates were used in the dissertations. 6 of them were foreign, and the most frequently used ― in 55 dissertations ― were Russian force plates of three brands registered as medical devices, of which only one was an officially approved Measurement Device. In the analysis of the data obtained using the force plates, the dissertators applied 30 quantitative indices, of which "length", "speed" and "area" of the statokinesiogram were the most frequently used. The averaged characteristics of candidate and doctoral works in terms of the number of participants or patients included in the study, the number of sources, conclusions, etc. were represented. Interpretation of quantitative characteristics and content of dissertation works concerns comparison with the data of the analysis for the previous decade, and helps to reveal the features and the prospects of the stabilometry application.
2016-2022年俄罗斯学位论文中力板和专家群体的应用
在俄罗斯 48 家科研机构进行的 90 项使用力板的论文研究中,有 2 万多名健康参与者和患者参加。89名专家对这些研究进行了指导,他们与43个主要组织的167名官方反对者和代表一起,可被归类为该科学领域的专家团。本报告首次列出了相关名单。论文样本主要分布在临床专业(超过 70%)和教学专业(约 20%)之间。论文中使用了 14 种不同型号(品牌)的测力板。其中 6 种是国外产品,而在 55 篇论文中使用最多的是俄罗斯的测力板,有 3 种品牌已注册为医疗器械,其中只有一种是官方批准的测量设备。在分析使用测力板获得的数据时,学位论文作者使用了 30 种定量指标,其中最常用的是静力图的 "长度"、"速度 "和 "面积"。候选论文和博士论文在研究对象或患者人数、资料来源数量、结论等方面的平均特点得到了体现。对学位论文的定量特征和内容的解释涉及到与前十年分析数据的比较,并有助于揭示稳定测量应用的特点和前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信