Transnational governance standards in ensuring sustainable development and operation of hydropower projects in transboundary basins

IF 3.3 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Owen McIntyre
{"title":"Transnational governance standards in ensuring sustainable development and operation of hydropower projects in transboundary basins","authors":"Owen McIntyre","doi":"10.3389/fclim.2023.1329076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of “transnational” law encompasses a sophisticated corpus of globally applicable rules, standards and safeguards, often informal in origin, which are widely accepted around the world and supported across a range of business sectors and civil society constituencies. The recent proliferation of such “transnational” law extends to the hydropower sector, where normative standards and safeguards increasingly apply to promote and certify sustainable practices in the development and operation of hydropower projects. Such projects are associated with significant environmental and social impacts and the projected increase in hydropower investments, mainly in emerging economies, will require effective supplemental regulatory tools. Many such projects will be located in, or impact upon, international rivers, thereby adding a further layer of complexity regarding their effective regulation and increased the risk of inter-State disputes over the equitable use of shared waters. Such complexity and risk will be exacerbated by increased uncertainty due to climate change. Thus, the existence of widely accepted transnational standards, which are relevant and applicable to hydropower development globally, can play a key role in building trust between watercourse States and in promoting greater transboundary water cooperation. This article explores the potential role of transnational standards in improved regulation of environmental and social impacts associated with hydropower projects located on international watercourses and the extent to which such standards cohere with established and emerging requirements of international water law. It thus examines the synergies arising between these informal and formal regulatory frameworks with a view to developing a better understanding of their interaction in practice. In so doing, it focuses on two key categories of applicable transnational regime: a sustainability certification and labeling scheme dedicated to hydropower projects and operated by the Hydropower Sustainability Council; and MDB environmental and social safeguard standards imposed upon major water-related projects, including hydropower projects, particularly those adopted by the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).","PeriodicalId":33632,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Climate","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2023.1329076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion of “transnational” law encompasses a sophisticated corpus of globally applicable rules, standards and safeguards, often informal in origin, which are widely accepted around the world and supported across a range of business sectors and civil society constituencies. The recent proliferation of such “transnational” law extends to the hydropower sector, where normative standards and safeguards increasingly apply to promote and certify sustainable practices in the development and operation of hydropower projects. Such projects are associated with significant environmental and social impacts and the projected increase in hydropower investments, mainly in emerging economies, will require effective supplemental regulatory tools. Many such projects will be located in, or impact upon, international rivers, thereby adding a further layer of complexity regarding their effective regulation and increased the risk of inter-State disputes over the equitable use of shared waters. Such complexity and risk will be exacerbated by increased uncertainty due to climate change. Thus, the existence of widely accepted transnational standards, which are relevant and applicable to hydropower development globally, can play a key role in building trust between watercourse States and in promoting greater transboundary water cooperation. This article explores the potential role of transnational standards in improved regulation of environmental and social impacts associated with hydropower projects located on international watercourses and the extent to which such standards cohere with established and emerging requirements of international water law. It thus examines the synergies arising between these informal and formal regulatory frameworks with a view to developing a better understanding of their interaction in practice. In so doing, it focuses on two key categories of applicable transnational regime: a sustainability certification and labeling scheme dedicated to hydropower projects and operated by the Hydropower Sustainability Council; and MDB environmental and social safeguard standards imposed upon major water-related projects, including hydropower projects, particularly those adopted by the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).
确保跨界流域水电项目可持续开发和运营的跨国治理标准
跨国 "法律的概念包括一套复杂的全球适用的规则、标准和保障措施,这些规则、标准和保障措施往往起源于非正式的方式,在世界各地被广泛接受,并得到一系列商业部门和民间社会团体的支持。这种 "跨国 "法律最近在水电领域大量出现,规范性标准和保障措施越来越多地应用于促进和认证水电项目开发和运营中的可持续做法。这些项目会对环境和社会产生重大影响,而且预计水电投资(主要在新兴经济体)的增加将需要有效的补充监管工具。许多此类项目将位于国际河流或对其产生影响,从而进一步增加了对其进行有效监管的复杂性,并增加了因公平使用共有水域而引发国家间争端的风险。气候变化带来的不确定性的增加将加剧这种复杂性和风险。因此,广泛接受的跨国标准与全球水电开发相关并适用于全球水电开发,可在建立水道国之间的信任和促进更广泛的跨界水合作方面发挥关键作用。本文探讨了跨国标准在改善与国际水道上的水电项目相关的环境和社会影响监管方面的潜在作用,以及这些标准与国际水法的既有要求和新要求的一致性程度。因此,本报告探讨了这些非正式和正式监管框架之间的协同作用,以期更好地理解它们在实践中的相互作用。在此过程中,本报告重点关注适用的跨国制度中的两个关键类别:由水电可持续性理事会运作的、专门针对水电项目的可持续性认证和标签计划;多边开发银行对包括水电项目在内的主要水相关项目实施的环境和社会保障标准,特别是世界银行和欧洲复兴开发银行(EBRD)采用的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Climate
Frontiers in Climate Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信