OSMANLI YÖNETİMİ VE AVRUPALI KONSOLOSLAR: 17. YÜZYILDA VE 18. YÜZYILIN İLK YARISINDA KONSOLOSLUK FAALİYETLERİNİN DESTEKLENMESİ

Nagihan Göktaş
{"title":"OSMANLI YÖNETİMİ VE AVRUPALI KONSOLOSLAR: 17. YÜZYILDA VE 18. YÜZYILIN İLK YARISINDA KONSOLOSLUK FAALİYETLERİNİN DESTEKLENMESİ","authors":"Nagihan Göktaş","doi":"10.53718/gttad.1373892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consulates, given certain commercial and legal privileges from the Ottoman Empire, served as entities that facilitated and maintained the commercial activities of foreign merchants. Capitulations provided the legal foundation for non-Muslim Europeans to engage in commerce in the Ottoman dominions. Large communities of European merchants conducted business in the empire’s major commercial hubs under the protection of their ambassadors in Istanbul, and consuls in several ports and cities. Besides capitulations, imperial decrees issued due to special circumstances were also a factor in determining the status of European communities and officials in Ottoman lands and could influence the living of a foreign community. The Ottoman authorities acknowledged the jurisdiction of their own ambassadors and consuls of foreign merchants. Articles within the ahdnames and berats stated the degree of authority consuls had in the Ottoman lands. Nonetheless, the articles on consular Consulates, having been granted specific commercial and legal privileges by the Ottoman Empire, functioned as entities that facilitated and upheld the commercial activities of foreign merchants. Capitulations laid the legal groundwork for the participation of non-Muslim Europeans in commerce within the Ottoman dominions. Extensive communities of European merchants engaged in business within the empire's major commercial hubs under the protection of their ambassadors in Istanbul and consuls in various ports and cities. In addition to capitulations, imperial decrees, issued due to special circumstances, played a role in determining the status of European communities and officials in Ottoman lands, thereby influencing the livelihood of foreign communities. The Ottoman authorities recognized the jurisdiction of their own ambassadors and consuls of foreign merchants. The articles within the ahdnames and berats specified the extent of authority consuls held in the Ottoman lands. Nevertheless, the articles pertaining to consular operations were notably limited and failed to encompass all aspects of consular activities. \nThe precise implementation and functioning of consular privileges granted by the capitulations, aside from matters outlined in the articles, remain unknown. According to the capitulations, consuls emerged as semi-autonomous actors, enjoying complete freedom in their affairs and being accountable only to their superiors—either the resident ambassadors or the government in their home country. While this information may be accurate, it obscures the potential influence of Ottoman interventions and regulations. Alternative sources beyond the capitulations may offer a more comprehensive understanding. \nSeveral studies have explored consular legal activities, but relatively less attention has been devoted to the issues consuls addressed outside their legal responsibilities and their collaboration with the Ottoman administration. This research seeks to analyze the connections between consulates and Ottoman authorities, particularly in terms of appointment, ensuring their safety, and collecting consular fees. The investigation aims to reveal how the Ottoman administration managed consulates through the perspective of Ottoman archival sources, integrating Düvel-i Ecnebiye (registers of foreign states) and Mühimme registers from the Prime Ministry Ottoman State Archives for this purpose. \nSignificantly, the Ottoman administration played a crucial role in appointing consuls, collecting consular fees, and creating an environment conducive to the safe execution of consular duties. By supporting consuls in these aspects, European consuls in the Empire were able to operate efficiently, and the consular system functioned without complications.","PeriodicalId":150594,"journal":{"name":"Genel Türk Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genel Türk Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53718/gttad.1373892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consulates, given certain commercial and legal privileges from the Ottoman Empire, served as entities that facilitated and maintained the commercial activities of foreign merchants. Capitulations provided the legal foundation for non-Muslim Europeans to engage in commerce in the Ottoman dominions. Large communities of European merchants conducted business in the empire’s major commercial hubs under the protection of their ambassadors in Istanbul, and consuls in several ports and cities. Besides capitulations, imperial decrees issued due to special circumstances were also a factor in determining the status of European communities and officials in Ottoman lands and could influence the living of a foreign community. The Ottoman authorities acknowledged the jurisdiction of their own ambassadors and consuls of foreign merchants. Articles within the ahdnames and berats stated the degree of authority consuls had in the Ottoman lands. Nonetheless, the articles on consular Consulates, having been granted specific commercial and legal privileges by the Ottoman Empire, functioned as entities that facilitated and upheld the commercial activities of foreign merchants. Capitulations laid the legal groundwork for the participation of non-Muslim Europeans in commerce within the Ottoman dominions. Extensive communities of European merchants engaged in business within the empire's major commercial hubs under the protection of their ambassadors in Istanbul and consuls in various ports and cities. In addition to capitulations, imperial decrees, issued due to special circumstances, played a role in determining the status of European communities and officials in Ottoman lands, thereby influencing the livelihood of foreign communities. The Ottoman authorities recognized the jurisdiction of their own ambassadors and consuls of foreign merchants. The articles within the ahdnames and berats specified the extent of authority consuls held in the Ottoman lands. Nevertheless, the articles pertaining to consular operations were notably limited and failed to encompass all aspects of consular activities. The precise implementation and functioning of consular privileges granted by the capitulations, aside from matters outlined in the articles, remain unknown. According to the capitulations, consuls emerged as semi-autonomous actors, enjoying complete freedom in their affairs and being accountable only to their superiors—either the resident ambassadors or the government in their home country. While this information may be accurate, it obscures the potential influence of Ottoman interventions and regulations. Alternative sources beyond the capitulations may offer a more comprehensive understanding. Several studies have explored consular legal activities, but relatively less attention has been devoted to the issues consuls addressed outside their legal responsibilities and their collaboration with the Ottoman administration. This research seeks to analyze the connections between consulates and Ottoman authorities, particularly in terms of appointment, ensuring their safety, and collecting consular fees. The investigation aims to reveal how the Ottoman administration managed consulates through the perspective of Ottoman archival sources, integrating Düvel-i Ecnebiye (registers of foreign states) and Mühimme registers from the Prime Ministry Ottoman State Archives for this purpose. Significantly, the Ottoman administration played a crucial role in appointing consuls, collecting consular fees, and creating an environment conducive to the safe execution of consular duties. By supporting consuls in these aspects, European consuls in the Empire were able to operate efficiently, and the consular system functioned without complications.
奥斯曼帝国政府与欧洲领事:支持 17 世纪和 18 世纪上半叶的领事活动
领事馆从奥斯曼帝国获得某些商业和法律特权,是促进和维护外国商人商业活动的实体。领事协定为非穆斯林欧洲人在奥斯曼帝国统治区从事商业活动提供了法律基础。大批欧洲商人在其驻伊斯坦布尔大使和驻多个港口和城市的领事的保护下,在帝国的主要商业中心开展业务。除了投降书,因特殊情况而颁布的帝国法令也是决定欧洲社区和官员在奥斯曼帝国土地上地位的一个因素,并可能影响外国社区的生活。奥斯曼帝国当局承认本国大使和外国商人领事的管辖权。ahdnames和berats中的条款规定了领事在奥斯曼帝国领土上的权力程度。然而,领事条款 领事被奥斯曼帝国授予特定的商业和法律特权,是促进和维护外国商人商业活动的实体。领事协定为非穆斯林欧洲人在奥斯曼帝国境内参与商业活动奠定了法律基础。在其驻伊斯坦布尔大使和驻各港口和城市领事的保护下,欧洲商人在帝国的主要商业中心广泛开展商业活动。除投降书外,因特殊情况而颁布的帝国法令也在决定欧洲社区和官员在奥斯曼帝国土地上的地位方面发挥了作用,从而影响了外国社区的生计。奥斯曼帝国当局承认本国大使和外国商人领事的管辖权。ahdnames和berats中的条款规定了领事在奥斯曼帝国领土上的权力范围。然而,有关领事业务的条款明显有限,未能涵盖领事活动的所有方面。除了条款中概述的事项外,投降书赋予领事特权的具体实施和运作情况仍不得而知。根据投降书,领事是半自治的行为者,在其事务中享有完全的自由,只对其上级--常驻大使或本国政府--负责。尽管这一信息可能是准确的,但它掩盖了奥斯曼帝国干预和法规的潜在影响。除投降书之外的其他资料来源可能会提供更全面的了解。有几项研究探讨了领事的法律活动,但对领事在其法律职责之外处理的问题以及他们与奥斯曼帝国政府的合作关注相对较少。本研究试图分析领事馆与奥斯曼帝国当局之间的联系,特别是在任命、确保领事安全和收取领事费方面。调查旨在从奥斯曼档案资料的角度揭示奥斯曼帝国政府是如何管理领事馆的,为此整合了首相府奥斯曼国家档案馆的 Düvel-i Ecnebiye(外国登记册)和 Mühimme 登记册。重要的是,奥斯曼帝国的行政部门在任命领事、收取领事费和创造有利于领事安全履行职责的环境方面发挥了至关重要的作用。通过在这些方面为领事提供支持,帝国境内的欧洲领事得以高效运作,领事制度也得以顺利运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信