The Effects of Switch Therapy in Osteoporosis Treatment after Romosozumab after Comparing with Prior Treatment

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Akira Horikawa, Y. Kasukawa, Michio Hongo, A. Sano, N. Miyakoshi
{"title":"The Effects of Switch Therapy in Osteoporosis Treatment after Romosozumab after Comparing with Prior Treatment","authors":"Akira Horikawa, Y. Kasukawa, Michio Hongo, A. Sano, N. Miyakoshi","doi":"10.1155/2024/2144527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale. Although romosozumab is one of the most effective treatments for osteoporosis by increasing bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and femur and recommended for denosumab as switch therapy, these effects regarding its prior treatment have not yet been evaluated clearly. This study focused on the effects of switch therapy from romosozumab to denosumab in regard to prior treatment of osteoporosis including bone mineral density and bone turnover marker and other related factors. Patient Concerns. 15 osteoporotic patients were assigned to the naïve group, 15 were assigned to the teriparatide group, and 10 were assigned to the bisphosphonate group. Interventions. Patients who were treated as outpatients for osteoporosis with romosozumab for 1 year and switched to denosumab between 2020 and 2022 at our hospital were examined. Our hospital registry included 40 osteoporotic patients who were over 65 years of age with bone mineral density (bone mineral density): T score <−2.5 standard deviations (SDs) and fracture assessment tool (FRAX) score >20%. Outcomes. The naïve group had the highest increase in LS BMD among these three groups during switch therapy from romosozumab to denosumab, while there were no significant differences about adverse drug events and serum Ca concentration among them. There was no incidence of fracture. Conclusion. These findings indicate that the effects of osteoporotic treatment of switch therapy from romosozumab to denosumab were likely to affect prior treatment of osteoporosis.","PeriodicalId":45384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteoporosis","volume":"32 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2144527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale. Although romosozumab is one of the most effective treatments for osteoporosis by increasing bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and femur and recommended for denosumab as switch therapy, these effects regarding its prior treatment have not yet been evaluated clearly. This study focused on the effects of switch therapy from romosozumab to denosumab in regard to prior treatment of osteoporosis including bone mineral density and bone turnover marker and other related factors. Patient Concerns. 15 osteoporotic patients were assigned to the naïve group, 15 were assigned to the teriparatide group, and 10 were assigned to the bisphosphonate group. Interventions. Patients who were treated as outpatients for osteoporosis with romosozumab for 1 year and switched to denosumab between 2020 and 2022 at our hospital were examined. Our hospital registry included 40 osteoporotic patients who were over 65 years of age with bone mineral density (bone mineral density): T score <−2.5 standard deviations (SDs) and fracture assessment tool (FRAX) score >20%. Outcomes. The naïve group had the highest increase in LS BMD among these three groups during switch therapy from romosozumab to denosumab, while there were no significant differences about adverse drug events and serum Ca concentration among them. There was no incidence of fracture. Conclusion. These findings indicate that the effects of osteoporotic treatment of switch therapy from romosozumab to denosumab were likely to affect prior treatment of osteoporosis.
罗莫单抗治疗骨质疏松症后的转换疗法与之前治疗的效果比较
理由尽管罗莫司单抗是治疗骨质疏松症最有效的药物之一,能增加腰椎和股骨的骨矿密度,并被推荐作为地诺单抗的转换疗法,但其对之前治疗的影响尚未得到明确评估。本研究重点关注从罗莫司单抗到地诺单抗的转换疗法对之前治疗骨质疏松症的影响,包括骨矿密度和骨转换标志物及其他相关因素。关注患者。15 名骨质疏松症患者被分配到新药组,15 名被分配到特立帕肽组,10 名被分配到双膦酸盐组。干预。研究对象为在本医院门诊接受罗莫索单抗治疗1年的骨质疏松症患者,在2020年至2022年期间改用地诺单抗治疗。我们医院的登记册纳入了 40 名骨质疏松症患者,他们的年龄都在 65 岁以上,骨矿密度(bone mineral density:)T 评分 20%。结果。从罗莫单抗到地诺单抗的转换治疗过程中,三组患者中天真组的LS BMD增加率最高,而三组患者在药物不良反应和血清Ca浓度方面无显著差异。无骨折发生。结论这些研究结果表明,从罗莫单抗到地诺单抗的转换疗法对骨质疏松症治疗的影响很可能会影响到之前的骨质疏松症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信