Gestational diabetes mellitus in Cameroon: prevalence, risk factors and screening strategies

E. Sobngwi, Joelle Sobngwi-Tambekou, J. Katte, J. B. Echouffo-Tcheugui, E. Balti, A. Kengne, L. Fezeu, C. Ditah, A. Tchatchoua, M. Dehayem, Nigel C. Unwin, Judith Rankin, J. Mbanya, R. Bell
{"title":"Gestational diabetes mellitus in Cameroon: prevalence, risk factors and screening strategies","authors":"E. Sobngwi, Joelle Sobngwi-Tambekou, J. Katte, J. B. Echouffo-Tcheugui, E. Balti, A. Kengne, L. Fezeu, C. Ditah, A. Tchatchoua, M. Dehayem, Nigel C. Unwin, Judith Rankin, J. Mbanya, R. Bell","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1272333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The burden of gestational diabetes (GDM) and the optimal screening strategies in African populations are yet to be determined. We assessed the prevalence of GDM and the performance of various screening tests in a Cameroonian population.We carried out a cross-sectional study involving the screening of 983 women at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy for GDM using serial tests, including fasting plasma (FPG), random blood glucose (RBG), a 1-hour 50g glucose challenge test (GCT), and standard 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). GDM was defined using the World Health Organization (WHO 1999), International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Special Group (IADPSG 2010), and National Institute for Health Care Excellence (NICE 2015) criteria. GDM correlates were assessed using logistic regressions, and c-statistics were used to assess the performance of screening strategies.GDM prevalence was 5·9%, 17·7%, and 11·0% using WHO, IADPSG, and NICE criteria, respectively. Previous stillbirth [odds ratio: 3·14, 95%CI: 1·27-7·76)] was the main correlate of GDM. The optimal cut-points to diagnose WHO-defined GDM were 5·9 mmol/L for RPG (c-statistic 0·62) and 7·1 mmol/L for 1-hour 50g GCT (c-statistic 0·76). The same cut-off value for RPG was applicable for IADPSG-diagnosed GDM while the threshold was 6·5 mmol/L (c-statistic 0·61) for NICE-diagnosed GDM. The optimal cut-off of 1-hour 50g GCT was similar for IADPSG and NICE-diagnosed GDM. WHO-defined GDM was always confirmed by another diagnosis strategy while IADPSG and GCT independently identified at least 66·9 and 41·0% of the cases.GDM is common among Cameroonian women. Effective detection of GDM in under-resourced settings may require simpler algorithms including the initial use of FPG, which could substantially increase screening yield.","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1272333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The burden of gestational diabetes (GDM) and the optimal screening strategies in African populations are yet to be determined. We assessed the prevalence of GDM and the performance of various screening tests in a Cameroonian population.We carried out a cross-sectional study involving the screening of 983 women at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy for GDM using serial tests, including fasting plasma (FPG), random blood glucose (RBG), a 1-hour 50g glucose challenge test (GCT), and standard 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). GDM was defined using the World Health Organization (WHO 1999), International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Special Group (IADPSG 2010), and National Institute for Health Care Excellence (NICE 2015) criteria. GDM correlates were assessed using logistic regressions, and c-statistics were used to assess the performance of screening strategies.GDM prevalence was 5·9%, 17·7%, and 11·0% using WHO, IADPSG, and NICE criteria, respectively. Previous stillbirth [odds ratio: 3·14, 95%CI: 1·27-7·76)] was the main correlate of GDM. The optimal cut-points to diagnose WHO-defined GDM were 5·9 mmol/L for RPG (c-statistic 0·62) and 7·1 mmol/L for 1-hour 50g GCT (c-statistic 0·76). The same cut-off value for RPG was applicable for IADPSG-diagnosed GDM while the threshold was 6·5 mmol/L (c-statistic 0·61) for NICE-diagnosed GDM. The optimal cut-off of 1-hour 50g GCT was similar for IADPSG and NICE-diagnosed GDM. WHO-defined GDM was always confirmed by another diagnosis strategy while IADPSG and GCT independently identified at least 66·9 and 41·0% of the cases.GDM is common among Cameroonian women. Effective detection of GDM in under-resourced settings may require simpler algorithms including the initial use of FPG, which could substantially increase screening yield.
喀麦隆的妊娠糖尿病:发病率、风险因素和筛查策略
妊娠糖尿病(GDM)在非洲人口中的负担和最佳筛查策略尚待确定。我们开展了一项横断面研究,对 983 名怀孕 24-28 周的妇女进行了妊娠糖尿病筛查,筛查方法包括空腹血浆 (FPG)、随机血糖 (RBG)、1 小时 50 克葡萄糖挑战试验 (GCT) 和标准 2 小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验 (OGTT)。GDM的定义采用世界卫生组织(WHO,1999年)、国际糖尿病与妊娠特别小组协会(IADPSG,2010年)和美国国家卫生保健卓越研究所(NICE,2015年)的标准。使用逻辑回归评估了 GDM 相关性,并使用 c 统计量评估了筛查策略的效果。根据 WHO、IADPSG 和 NICE 标准,GDM 患病率分别为 5-9%、17-7% 和 11-0%。既往死产[几率比:3-14,95%CI:1-27-7-76]是 GDM 的主要相关因素。诊断 WHO 定义的 GDM 的最佳临界值为 RPG 5-9 mmol/L(c-统计量 0-62)和 1 小时 50g GCT 7-1 mmol/L(c-统计量 0-76)。RPG的临界值同样适用于IADPSG诊断的GDM,而NICE诊断的GDM的临界值为6-5 mmol/L(c-统计量0-61)。对于 IADPSG 和 NICE 诊断的 GDM,1 小时 50g GCT 的最佳临界值相似。WHO定义的GDM总能通过另一种诊断策略得到证实,而IADPSG和GCT至少能独立发现66-9%和41-0%的病例。在资源匮乏的环境中有效检测 GDM 可能需要更简单的算法,包括最初使用 FPG,这可以大大提高筛查率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信