Emanuele Giovannardi, A. Brusa, Boris Petrone, N. Cavina, Roberto Tonelli, Ioannis Kitsopanidis
{"title":"AI-Based Virtual Sensing of Gaseous Pollutant Emissions at the\n Tailpipe of a High-Performance Vehicle","authors":"Emanuele Giovannardi, A. Brusa, Boris Petrone, N. Cavina, Roberto Tonelli, Ioannis Kitsopanidis","doi":"10.4271/03-17-04-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This scientific publication presents the application of artificial intelligence\n (AI) techniques as a virtual sensor for tailpipe emissions of CO, NOx, and HC in\n a high-performance vehicle. The study aims to address critical challenges faced\n in real industrial applications, including signal alignment and signal dynamics\n management. A comprehensive pre-processing pipeline is proposed to tackle these\n issues, and a light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM) model is employed to\n estimate emissions during real driving cycles. The research compares two\n modeling approaches: one involving a unique “direct model” and another using a\n “two-stage model” which leverages distinct models for the engine and the\n aftertreatment. The findings suggest that the direct model strikes the best\n balance between simplicity and accuracy. Furthermore, the study investigates two\n sensor setups: a standard configuration and an optimized one, which incorporates\n an additional lambda probe in the exhaust line after the main catalyst. The\n results indicate a significant enhancement in performance for NOx and CO\n estimations with the introduction of the third lambda probe, while HC results\n remain relatively unchanged. Additionally, the AI model is tested on two\n different electronic control unit (ECU) software calibrations, yielding\n excellent results in both cases. This suggests that machine learning models are\n robust to control software variation and can be used to optimize software\n calibrations in a virtual environment, reducing the reliance on extensive\n experimental testing. Moreover, the AI model’s performance demonstrates\n compatibility with real-time implementation. In conclusion, this work\n establishes the viability and efficiency of AI techniques in accurately\n estimating tailpipe emissions from an engine in an industrial context. The study\n showcases the potential for AI to contribute to emission estimation and\n optimization processes, offering a promising pathway for an innovative\n industrial practice.","PeriodicalId":47948,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Engines","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Engines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-04-0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This scientific publication presents the application of artificial intelligence
(AI) techniques as a virtual sensor for tailpipe emissions of CO, NOx, and HC in
a high-performance vehicle. The study aims to address critical challenges faced
in real industrial applications, including signal alignment and signal dynamics
management. A comprehensive pre-processing pipeline is proposed to tackle these
issues, and a light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM) model is employed to
estimate emissions during real driving cycles. The research compares two
modeling approaches: one involving a unique “direct model” and another using a
“two-stage model” which leverages distinct models for the engine and the
aftertreatment. The findings suggest that the direct model strikes the best
balance between simplicity and accuracy. Furthermore, the study investigates two
sensor setups: a standard configuration and an optimized one, which incorporates
an additional lambda probe in the exhaust line after the main catalyst. The
results indicate a significant enhancement in performance for NOx and CO
estimations with the introduction of the third lambda probe, while HC results
remain relatively unchanged. Additionally, the AI model is tested on two
different electronic control unit (ECU) software calibrations, yielding
excellent results in both cases. This suggests that machine learning models are
robust to control software variation and can be used to optimize software
calibrations in a virtual environment, reducing the reliance on extensive
experimental testing. Moreover, the AI model’s performance demonstrates
compatibility with real-time implementation. In conclusion, this work
establishes the viability and efficiency of AI techniques in accurately
estimating tailpipe emissions from an engine in an industrial context. The study
showcases the potential for AI to contribute to emission estimation and
optimization processes, offering a promising pathway for an innovative
industrial practice.