Gender relations and decision-making on climate change adaptation in rural East African households: A qualitative systematic review

Johanne Niemann, Miriam El-Mahdi, H. Samuelsen, B. Tersbøl
{"title":"Gender relations and decision-making on climate change adaptation in rural East African households: A qualitative systematic review","authors":"Johanne Niemann, Miriam El-Mahdi, H. Samuelsen, B. Tersbøl","doi":"10.1371/journal.pclm.0000279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Climatic changes are threatening rural livelihoods in East Africa. Evidence suggests that climate change adaptation in this context might reproduce inequitable intra-household gender relations and that adaptation may be more effective when women are involved in meaningful ways. Hence, a nuanced understanding of the gendered nature of intra-household adaptation decision-making is essential for gender-responsive research, policy-making and practice. This qualitative systematic review aimed to investigate how gender relations influence decision-making concerning climate change adaptation in rural East African households and how decisions about climate change adaptation influence intra-household gender dynamics, in turn. Applying qualitative meta-synthesis principles, systematic searches were conducted in 8 databases and supplemented with comprehensive hand searches. 3,662 unique hits were screened using predetermined inclusion criteria, leading to a final sample of 21 papers. Relevant findings of these studies were synthesised using inductive thematic coding, memoing and thematic analysis. While men tended to be the primary decision-makers, women exercised some decision-making power in traditionally female domains and in female-headed households. Women’s and men’s roles in intra-household adaptation decision-making appeared to be influenced by a plethora of interconnected factors, including gender norms, gendered divisions of labour and access, ownership and control over resources. Intra-household adaptation seemed to impact the dynamics between male and female household members. The pathways of this influence were complex, and the ultimate outcomes for men and women remained unclear. We discuss our findings with reference to theoretical literature on gender-transformative approaches in development and adaptation and previous research concerning the gendered nature of climate change adaptation in East Africa. We then discuss implications for gender-responsive adaptation interventions.","PeriodicalId":74463,"journal":{"name":"PLOS climate","volume":"18 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Climatic changes are threatening rural livelihoods in East Africa. Evidence suggests that climate change adaptation in this context might reproduce inequitable intra-household gender relations and that adaptation may be more effective when women are involved in meaningful ways. Hence, a nuanced understanding of the gendered nature of intra-household adaptation decision-making is essential for gender-responsive research, policy-making and practice. This qualitative systematic review aimed to investigate how gender relations influence decision-making concerning climate change adaptation in rural East African households and how decisions about climate change adaptation influence intra-household gender dynamics, in turn. Applying qualitative meta-synthesis principles, systematic searches were conducted in 8 databases and supplemented with comprehensive hand searches. 3,662 unique hits were screened using predetermined inclusion criteria, leading to a final sample of 21 papers. Relevant findings of these studies were synthesised using inductive thematic coding, memoing and thematic analysis. While men tended to be the primary decision-makers, women exercised some decision-making power in traditionally female domains and in female-headed households. Women’s and men’s roles in intra-household adaptation decision-making appeared to be influenced by a plethora of interconnected factors, including gender norms, gendered divisions of labour and access, ownership and control over resources. Intra-household adaptation seemed to impact the dynamics between male and female household members. The pathways of this influence were complex, and the ultimate outcomes for men and women remained unclear. We discuss our findings with reference to theoretical literature on gender-transformative approaches in development and adaptation and previous research concerning the gendered nature of climate change adaptation in East Africa. We then discuss implications for gender-responsive adaptation interventions.
东非农村家庭中的性别关系和适应气候变化的决策:定性系统审查
背景:气候变化正在威胁东非农村的生计。有证据表明,在这种情况下,适应气候变化可能会再现不公平的家庭内部性别关系,而当妇女以有意义的方式参与其中时,适应可能会更加有效。因此,细致入微地了解家庭内部适应决策的性别性质对于促进性别平等的研究、决策和实践至关重要。本定性系统综述旨在研究性别关系如何影响东非农村家庭适应气候变化的决策,以及适应气候变化的决策如何反过来影响家庭内部的性别动态。采用定性元综合原则,在 8 个数据库中进行了系统检索,并辅以全面的手工检索。采用预先确定的纳入标准筛选了 3,662 个独特的检索结果,最终确定了 21 篇论文样本。利用归纳式主题编码、备忘录和主题分析对这些研究的相关结果进行了综合。虽然男性往往是主要的决策者,但在传统的女性领域和女户主家庭中,女性也行使着一定的决策权。女性和男性在家庭内部适应决策中的角色似乎受到众多相互关联因素的影响,包括性别规范、性别分工以及资源的获取、所有权和控制权。家庭内部的适应似乎影响着男女家庭成员之间的动态关系。这种影响的途径很复杂,对男性和女性的最终结果仍不清楚。我们在讨论我们的研究结果时,参考了有关发展和适应中性别转变方法的理论文献,以及有关东非气候变化适应的性别性质的以往研究。然后,我们讨论了促进性别平等的适应干预措施的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信