ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG DINYATAKAN TIDAK BERKEKUATAN HUKUM (Study Putusan Hakim No: 28/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Bdw)

Novi Indriawati, Heriyanto Heriyanto, Moh. Ali Hofi
{"title":"ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG DINYATAKAN TIDAK BERKEKUATAN HUKUM (Study Putusan Hakim No: 28/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Bdw)","authors":"Novi Indriawati, Heriyanto Heriyanto, Moh. Ali Hofi","doi":"10.35316/hukmy.2023.v3i2.402-411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesian country as a country of law, in form of certainty of order legal protection notarial deeds made before a notary for all matters relating to agreements and will be stated in a notarial deed and the aim is to declare the deed inauthentic and will not be left to the judge to decide that the authentic deed is relegated to a deed under the hand and can be canceled and declared to be invalid or null and void by the deed. This research aims to understand the legal consequences of notarial deeds based on decisions (study decision number 28/Pdt.G/2017/PN Bdw). The legal position of parties who are declared to have no legal force, this research uses a normative juridical method and the approach used is a statutory, conseptual (doctrine) and case approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertary legal materials. And in this research, we use liblary data collection techniques (liberary research) and analyze the data deductively namely drawing conclusions from a general problem regarding the concrete problem being faced. The results found are contained in the decision of the panel of judges in Case Number 28/Pdt.G/2017/PN Bdw. In the considerations that the judge applied, it was in accordance with article 1865 of the Civil Code which states that every person who has claimed to have rights.","PeriodicalId":299809,"journal":{"name":"HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum","volume":"1 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2023.v3i2.402-411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesian country as a country of law, in form of certainty of order legal protection notarial deeds made before a notary for all matters relating to agreements and will be stated in a notarial deed and the aim is to declare the deed inauthentic and will not be left to the judge to decide that the authentic deed is relegated to a deed under the hand and can be canceled and declared to be invalid or null and void by the deed. This research aims to understand the legal consequences of notarial deeds based on decisions (study decision number 28/Pdt.G/2017/PN Bdw). The legal position of parties who are declared to have no legal force, this research uses a normative juridical method and the approach used is a statutory, conseptual (doctrine) and case approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertary legal materials. And in this research, we use liblary data collection techniques (liberary research) and analyze the data deductively namely drawing conclusions from a general problem regarding the concrete problem being faced. The results found are contained in the decision of the panel of judges in Case Number 28/Pdt.G/2017/PN Bdw. In the considerations that the judge applied, it was in accordance with article 1865 of the Civil Code which states that every person who has claimed to have rights.
对公证人在处理案件过程中存在的问题进行分析(研究报告编号:28/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Bdw)。
印尼作为一个法治国家,在公证人面前为所有与协议有关的事项做出的公证契约都会以确定性命令的形式提供法律保护,并将在公证契约中说明,其目的是宣布契约不真实,不会任由法官决定,真实的契约被降级为手底下的契约,可以被取消并宣布为无效或无效的契约。本研究旨在了解基于决定(研究决定编号 28/Pdt.G/2017/PN Bdw)的公证契约的法律后果。本研究采用的是规范法学方法,所使用的方法是成文法、法理(学说)和案例法。所使用的法律材料来源包括第一手法律材料、第二手法律材料和第三手法律材料。在本研究中,我们使用图书馆数据收集技术(图书馆研究),并对数据进行演绎分析,即从一般问题中得出与所面临的具体问题有关的结论。所发现的结果载于第 28/Pdt.G/2017/PN Bdw 号案件合议庭的裁决中。在法官适用的考虑因素中,它符合《民法典》第 1865 条的规定,该条规定,每个声称拥有权利的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信