Disclosure of patenting activities within scientific publications as potential conflicts-of-interest: Evidences from biomedical literature

IF 2.2 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Luca Falciola , Massimo Barbieri
{"title":"Disclosure of patenting activities within scientific publications as potential conflicts-of-interest: Evidences from biomedical literature","authors":"Luca Falciola ,&nbsp;Massimo Barbieri","doi":"10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Most scientific publishers require authors to submit their manuscripts with a text reporting their parallel activities which might be considered as Conflicts-of-Interest (COI), including patent-related ones. The </span>patenting activities that are disclosed by authors or institutions as COI in articles within Conflicts-of-Interest Statements (COIS) are generally analyzed in the literature either within small datasets or using non-systematic methodologies. This study proposes methods for assessing COIS presence and their main features across biomedical topics and journals, particularly with respect to the patent filing details that may be disclosed herein. These methods have been established and tested in the freely available PubMed database by searching the literature indexed herein during the period 2011–2022. However, when comparing the results of such searches within PubMed and a selection of journals’ websites for a specific topic (such as COVID-19), COIS appear unevenly available and searchable in PubMed owing to the varying practices that each journal implements. Thus, COIS appear a possibly underestimated source of patent information but the search and analysis of COI disclosures in biomedical literature requires well-designed and controlled strategies for identifying the relevant evidences for a given scope, such as prior art analysis and legal or strategic evaluation of patenting activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51794,"journal":{"name":"World Patent Information","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Patent Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172219023000819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most scientific publishers require authors to submit their manuscripts with a text reporting their parallel activities which might be considered as Conflicts-of-Interest (COI), including patent-related ones. The patenting activities that are disclosed by authors or institutions as COI in articles within Conflicts-of-Interest Statements (COIS) are generally analyzed in the literature either within small datasets or using non-systematic methodologies. This study proposes methods for assessing COIS presence and their main features across biomedical topics and journals, particularly with respect to the patent filing details that may be disclosed herein. These methods have been established and tested in the freely available PubMed database by searching the literature indexed herein during the period 2011–2022. However, when comparing the results of such searches within PubMed and a selection of journals’ websites for a specific topic (such as COVID-19), COIS appear unevenly available and searchable in PubMed owing to the varying practices that each journal implements. Thus, COIS appear a possibly underestimated source of patent information but the search and analysis of COI disclosures in biomedical literature requires well-designed and controlled strategies for identifying the relevant evidences for a given scope, such as prior art analysis and legal or strategic evaluation of patenting activities.

Abstract Image

在科学出版物中披露专利活动是潜在的利益冲突:来自生物医学文献的证据
大多数科学出版商都要求作者在提交稿件时报告其可能被视为利益冲突(COI)的平行活动,包括与专利相关的活动。对于作者或机构在利益冲突声明(COIS)中作为 COI 披露的专利活动,文献中一般都是通过小型数据集或使用非系统方法进行分析。本研究提出了评估 COIS 存在情况及其在生物医学主题和期刊中的主要特征的方法,特别是其中可能披露的专利申请细节。这些方法是在免费提供的 PubMed 数据库中,通过检索 2011-2022 年期间在此编入索引的文献而建立和测试的。然而,在比较 PubMed 和特定主题(如 COVID-19)的部分期刊网站上的搜索结果时,由于各期刊采用的方法不同,COIS 在 PubMed 上的可用性和可搜索性参差不齐。因此,COIS 似乎是一个可能被低估的专利信息来源,但生物医学文献中 COI 披露的检索和分析需要精心设计和控制的策略,以确定特定范围内的相关证据,如现有技术分析和专利活动的法律或战略评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Patent Information
World Patent Information INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The aim of World Patent Information is to provide a worldwide forum for the exchange of information between people working professionally in the field of Industrial Property information and documentation and to promote the widest possible use of the associated literature. Regular features include: papers concerned with all aspects of Industrial Property information and documentation; new regulations pertinent to Industrial Property information and documentation; short reports on relevant meetings and conferences; bibliographies, together with book and literature reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信