Distinctive features of experiential time: Duration, speed and event density

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Marianna Lamprou-Kokolaki , Yvan Nédélec , Simon Lhuillier , Virginie van Wassenhove
{"title":"Distinctive features of experiential time: Duration, speed and event density","authors":"Marianna Lamprou-Kokolaki ,&nbsp;Yvan Nédélec ,&nbsp;Simon Lhuillier ,&nbsp;Virginie van Wassenhove","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>William James’s use of “time in passing” and “stream of thoughts” may be two sides of the same coin that emerge from the brain segmenting the continuous flow of information into discrete events. Herein, we investigated how the density of events affects two temporal experiences: the felt duration and speed of time. Using a temporal bisection task, participants classified seconds-long videos of naturalistic scenes as short or long (duration), or slow or fast (passage of time). Videos contained a varying number and type of events. We found that a large number of events lengthened subjective duration and accelerated the felt passage of time. Surprisingly, participants were also faster at estimating their felt passage of time compared to duration. The perception of duration scaled with duration and event density, whereas the felt passage of time scaled with the rate of change. Altogether, our results suggest that distinct mechanisms underlie these two experiential times.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000023/pdfft?md5=6697bf6f634dbca76c7526d14184ec66&pid=1-s2.0-S1053810024000023-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

William James’s use of “time in passing” and “stream of thoughts” may be two sides of the same coin that emerge from the brain segmenting the continuous flow of information into discrete events. Herein, we investigated how the density of events affects two temporal experiences: the felt duration and speed of time. Using a temporal bisection task, participants classified seconds-long videos of naturalistic scenes as short or long (duration), or slow or fast (passage of time). Videos contained a varying number and type of events. We found that a large number of events lengthened subjective duration and accelerated the felt passage of time. Surprisingly, participants were also faster at estimating their felt passage of time compared to duration. The perception of duration scaled with duration and event density, whereas the felt passage of time scaled with the rate of change. Altogether, our results suggest that distinct mechanisms underlie these two experiential times.

体验时间的显著特征:持续时间、速度和事件密度
威廉-詹姆斯(William James)使用的 "流逝的时间 "和 "思想流 "可能是一枚硬币的两面,是大脑将连续的信息流分割成离散事件的结果。在此,我们研究了事件的密度如何影响两种时间体验:感觉到的时间长度和时间速度。通过时间分割任务,参与者将几秒钟长的自然场景视频分为短或长(持续时间)、慢或快(时间流逝)。视频包含不同数量和类型的事件。我们发现,大量的事件会延长主观持续时间,加快时间流逝的感觉。令人惊讶的是,与持续时间相比,受试者在估计自己感觉的时间流逝时也更快。对持续时间的感知与持续时间和事件密度成比例,而对时间流逝的感受则与变化率成比例。总之,我们的研究结果表明,这两种体验时间的机制是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信