Health equity in heart failure

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Aishwarya Vijay, Clyde W. Yancy
{"title":"Health equity in heart failure","authors":"Aishwarya Vijay,&nbsp;Clyde W. Yancy","doi":"10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>The treatment of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has substantially developed over the past decades. More than ever before, the application of appropriate evidence-based medical therapy for </span>HFrEF is associated with remarkable improvements in survival, noteworthy increases in </span>quality of life<span>, and a marked reduction in symptomatic HF sufficient to warrant hospitalization. These enhanced clinical outcomes are driven by the “four pillars” of HF therapy: 1) evidence-based beta blockers, 2) Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors /angiotensin II receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, 3) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists<span>, and most recently, 4) sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Despite robust evidence from well-conducted randomized clinical trials, guideline-directed medical therapies with established cardiovascular benefits remain significantly underutilized in clinical practice, particularly among under-represented minority populations. This phenomenon has led to class 1 level recommendations from the 2022 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America Guidelines to address HF disparities among vulnerable populations as follows. In this article, we highlight the difference between health equality and health equity and discuss the need to address </span></span></span><em>equity</em> in the treatment of heart failure, ensuring that the impressive progress made in the treatment of HFrEF is equally beneficial to <em>all</em><span><span> individuals. We discuss strategies to reduce and ultimately eliminate disparities in the determinants of health that particularly affect marginalized groups, including the socioeconomic determinants and racism as a threat to </span>public health. Finally, we discuss and propose a combination of the four pillars of ethics with the four pillars of GDMT to optimize and </span><em>personalize</em> treatment of all patients with HFrEF, to achieve true equity in the treatment of HF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21156,"journal":{"name":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033062024000057","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has substantially developed over the past decades. More than ever before, the application of appropriate evidence-based medical therapy for HFrEF is associated with remarkable improvements in survival, noteworthy increases in quality of life, and a marked reduction in symptomatic HF sufficient to warrant hospitalization. These enhanced clinical outcomes are driven by the “four pillars” of HF therapy: 1) evidence-based beta blockers, 2) Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors /angiotensin II receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, 3) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and most recently, 4) sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Despite robust evidence from well-conducted randomized clinical trials, guideline-directed medical therapies with established cardiovascular benefits remain significantly underutilized in clinical practice, particularly among under-represented minority populations. This phenomenon has led to class 1 level recommendations from the 2022 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America Guidelines to address HF disparities among vulnerable populations as follows. In this article, we highlight the difference between health equality and health equity and discuss the need to address equity in the treatment of heart failure, ensuring that the impressive progress made in the treatment of HFrEF is equally beneficial to all individuals. We discuss strategies to reduce and ultimately eliminate disparities in the determinants of health that particularly affect marginalized groups, including the socioeconomic determinants and racism as a threat to public health. Finally, we discuss and propose a combination of the four pillars of ethics with the four pillars of GDMT to optimize and personalize treatment of all patients with HFrEF, to achieve true equity in the treatment of HF.

心力衰竭的健康公平。
过去几十年来,射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HF)的治疗有了长足的发展。与以往任何时候相比,对射血分数减低性心力衰竭(HFrEF)采用适当的循证医学疗法都能显著改善患者的生存状况,提高生活质量,并明显减少足以导致住院治疗的症状性心力衰竭。这些临床疗效的提高得益于高血压治疗的 "四大支柱":1)循证β受体阻滞剂;2)肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素受体-肾素抑制剂;3)矿质皮质激素受体拮抗剂;以及最近的 4)钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2 抑制剂。尽管经过精心开展的随机临床试验提供了有力的证据,但在临床实践中,特别是在代表性不足的少数群体中,具有公认的心血管益处的指导性医疗疗法仍明显未得到充分利用。这一现象导致 2022 年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭协会指南提出了 1 级建议,以解决弱势人群中的高血压差异问题,具体如下。在本文中,我们强调了健康平等与健康公平之间的区别,并讨论了解决心衰治疗中的公平问题的必要性,以确保在治疗 HFrEF 方面取得的令人瞩目的进展同样惠及所有人。我们讨论了减少并最终消除特别影响边缘化群体的健康决定因素差距的策略,包括威胁公共健康的社会经济决定因素和种族主义。最后,我们讨论并建议将伦理的四大支柱与 GDMT 的四大支柱相结合,以优化和个性化治疗所有心房颤动 EF 患者,实现心房颤动 EF 治疗的真正公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in cardiovascular diseases
Progress in cardiovascular diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
7 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases provides comprehensive coverage of a single topic related to heart and circulatory disorders in each issue. Some issues include special articles, definitive reviews that capture the state of the art in the management of particular clinical problems in cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信