Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Small-Volume-Plasma Artificial Liver Model in the Treatment of Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Physiological research Pub Date : 2023-12-31
D Li, X Wang, J Zhou, Z Duan, R Yang, Y Liu, Y Chen, L Zhang, H Liu, W Li, J You
{"title":"Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Small-Volume-Plasma Artificial Liver Model in the Treatment of Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure.","authors":"D Li, X Wang, J Zhou, Z Duan, R Yang, Y Liu, Y Chen, L Zhang, H Liu, W Li, J You","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the efficacy and safety of a small-volume-plasma artificial liver support system (ALSS) in the treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). A retrospective analysis was performed. All ACLF patients received ALSS of plasma exchange & double plasma molecular absorb system (PE+DPMAS) treatment, and successfully completed this treatment. Patients were divided into small-volume and half-volume plasma groups. We compared the changes of the indicators on liver function, kidney function, blood coagulation function, and blood ammonia level before and after PE+DPMAS treatment; we compared the short-term and long-term curative effects between small-volume and half-volume plasma groups; and the factors influencing Week 4 and Week 12 mortality of ACLF patients were analyzed. The Week 4 improvement rates were 63.96 % and 66.86 % in the small-volume and half-volume plasma groups, respectively. The Week 12 survival rates in the small-volume-plasma and half-volume plasma groups were 66.72 % and 64.61 %, respectively. We found several risk factors affecting Week 4 and Week 12 mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves suggested no significant difference in Week 4 and Week 12 survival rates between the small-volume and half-volume plasma groups (P=0.34). The small-volume-plasma PE+DPMAS treatment could effectively reduce bilirubin and bile acids, and this was an approach with high safety and few complications, similar to the half-volume-plasma PE+DPMAS treatment. The small-volume-plasma PE+DPMAS has the advantage of greatly reducing the need for intraoperative plasma, which is especially of importance in times of shortage of plasma.</p>","PeriodicalId":20235,"journal":{"name":"Physiological research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10805255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the efficacy and safety of a small-volume-plasma artificial liver support system (ALSS) in the treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). A retrospective analysis was performed. All ACLF patients received ALSS of plasma exchange & double plasma molecular absorb system (PE+DPMAS) treatment, and successfully completed this treatment. Patients were divided into small-volume and half-volume plasma groups. We compared the changes of the indicators on liver function, kidney function, blood coagulation function, and blood ammonia level before and after PE+DPMAS treatment; we compared the short-term and long-term curative effects between small-volume and half-volume plasma groups; and the factors influencing Week 4 and Week 12 mortality of ACLF patients were analyzed. The Week 4 improvement rates were 63.96 % and 66.86 % in the small-volume and half-volume plasma groups, respectively. The Week 12 survival rates in the small-volume-plasma and half-volume plasma groups were 66.72 % and 64.61 %, respectively. We found several risk factors affecting Week 4 and Week 12 mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves suggested no significant difference in Week 4 and Week 12 survival rates between the small-volume and half-volume plasma groups (P=0.34). The small-volume-plasma PE+DPMAS treatment could effectively reduce bilirubin and bile acids, and this was an approach with high safety and few complications, similar to the half-volume-plasma PE+DPMAS treatment. The small-volume-plasma PE+DPMAS has the advantage of greatly reducing the need for intraoperative plasma, which is especially of importance in times of shortage of plasma.

小体积-血浆人工肝模型治疗急性-慢性肝衰竭的疗效和安全性分析
探讨小容量血浆人工肝支持系统(ALSS)治疗急性-慢性肝衰竭(ACLF)的有效性和安全性。我们进行了一项回顾性分析。所有急性-慢性肝衰竭患者都接受了血浆置换和双血浆分子吸收系统(PE+DPMAS)的ALSS治疗,并成功完成了治疗。患者被分为小容量血浆组和半容量血浆组。比较了PE+DPMAS治疗前后肝功能、肾功能、凝血功能、血氨水平等指标的变化;比较了小容量血浆组和半容量血浆组的短期疗效和长期疗效;分析了影响ACLF患者第4周和第12周死亡率的因素。结果显示,小容量血浆组和半容量血浆组第4周的好转率分别为63.96%和66.86%。小容量血浆组和半容量血浆组的第12周存活率分别为66.72%和64.61%。我们发现了影响第 4 周和第 12 周死亡率的几个风险因素。卡普兰-梅耶生存曲线显示,小容量血浆组和半容量血浆组的第4周和第12周生存率无明显差异(P=0.34)。小体积血浆 PE+DPMAS 治疗能有效降低胆红素和胆汁酸,而且这种方法安全性高、并发症少,与半体积血浆 PE+DPMAS 治疗相似。小体积血浆 PE+DPMAS 的优点是大大减少了术中对血浆的需求,这在血浆短缺时尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological research
Physiological research 医学-生理学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Research is a peer reviewed Open Access journal that publishes articles on normal and pathological physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, and pharmacology. Authors can submit original, previously unpublished research articles, review articles, rapid or short communications. Instructions for Authors - Respect the instructions carefully when submitting your manuscript. Submitted manuscripts or revised manuscripts that do not follow these Instructions will not be included into the peer-review process. The articles are available in full versions as pdf files beginning with volume 40, 1991. The journal publishes the online Ahead of Print /Pre-Press version of the articles that are searchable in Medline and can be cited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信