Pharmacokinetic Profile of Caffeine and Its Two Main Metabolites in Dried Blood Spots After Five Different Oral Caffeine Administration Forms-A Randomized Crossover Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Chiara Tuma, Andreas Thomas, Lasse Trede, Hans Braun, Mario Thevis
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Profile of Caffeine and Its Two Main Metabolites in Dried Blood Spots After Five Different Oral Caffeine Administration Forms-A Randomized Crossover Study.","authors":"Chiara Tuma, Andreas Thomas, Lasse Trede, Hans Braun, Mario Thevis","doi":"10.1123/ijsnem.2023-0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caffeine is an ergogenic substance that is consumed globally in many forms. The use of buccally absorbable formulations instead of gastrointestinal uptake has become increasingly popular over the years, especially when accelerated absorption with minimal gastrointestinal stress is desired. This study investigated the impact of five different formulations and administration routes of caffeine on the whole blood concentrations of caffeine, paraxanthine, and theobromine: caffeinated capsules, tablets, shots, pouches, and chewing gums. A uniform dose of caffeine (200 mg) was administered to 16 healthy recreational athletes (26.0 ± 2.1 years) using a randomized crossover design. Samples were taken in the form of dried blood spots at 16 different time points in a 2-hr timeframe after drug administration. The samples were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The results for caffeine showed no significant differences in the overall bioavailability (area under the concentration-time curve), maximal concentration, and time to maximum concentration. However, when analyzing the bioavailability of caffeine in the first 5, 10, and 15 min, the liquid caffeine formulation was superior to other administered forms (p < .05). This indicates that caffeine solubility has a major influence on its absorption rate. In sports, the rate of caffeine absorption must be considered, not only when ingesting anhydrous caffeine, but also when choosing buccal absorption. These findings imply that general guidelines for ergogenic caffeine use should consider the formulation used and, accordingly, the corresponding route of absorption.</p>","PeriodicalId":14334,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2023-0141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caffeine is an ergogenic substance that is consumed globally in many forms. The use of buccally absorbable formulations instead of gastrointestinal uptake has become increasingly popular over the years, especially when accelerated absorption with minimal gastrointestinal stress is desired. This study investigated the impact of five different formulations and administration routes of caffeine on the whole blood concentrations of caffeine, paraxanthine, and theobromine: caffeinated capsules, tablets, shots, pouches, and chewing gums. A uniform dose of caffeine (200 mg) was administered to 16 healthy recreational athletes (26.0 ± 2.1 years) using a randomized crossover design. Samples were taken in the form of dried blood spots at 16 different time points in a 2-hr timeframe after drug administration. The samples were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The results for caffeine showed no significant differences in the overall bioavailability (area under the concentration-time curve), maximal concentration, and time to maximum concentration. However, when analyzing the bioavailability of caffeine in the first 5, 10, and 15 min, the liquid caffeine formulation was superior to other administered forms (p < .05). This indicates that caffeine solubility has a major influence on its absorption rate. In sports, the rate of caffeine absorption must be considered, not only when ingesting anhydrous caffeine, but also when choosing buccal absorption. These findings imply that general guidelines for ergogenic caffeine use should consider the formulation used and, accordingly, the corresponding route of absorption.

咖啡因及其两种主要代谢物在五种不同咖啡因口服给药形式下干燥血斑中的药代动力学特征--随机交叉研究
咖啡因是一种能增强体质的物质,在全球有多种消费形式。多年来,使用颊吸收制剂代替胃肠道吸收的做法越来越流行,尤其是在希望加速吸收并将胃肠道压力降至最低的情况下。本研究调查了咖啡因的五种不同配方和给药途径对咖啡因、副黄嘌呤和可可碱全血浓度的影响:含咖啡因的胶囊、片剂、针剂、小袋装和口香糖。采用随机交叉设计,给 16 名健康的休闲运动员(26.0 ± 2.1 岁)服用统一剂量的咖啡因(200 毫克)。在服药后 2 小时内的 16 个不同时间点以干血点形式采集样本。样本采用经过验证的液相色谱-串联质谱法进行分析。结果显示,咖啡因的总体生物利用度(浓度-时间曲线下面积)、最大浓度和达到最大浓度的时间均无显著差异。然而,在分析咖啡因最初 5、10 和 15 分钟的生物利用度时,液体咖啡因制剂优于其他给药形式(p < .05)。这表明咖啡因的溶解度对其吸收率有很大影响。在运动中,不仅在摄入无水咖啡因时,而且在选择颊吸收时,都必须考虑咖啡因的吸收率。这些研究结果表明,使用咖啡因的一般指导原则应考虑所使用的配方以及相应的吸收途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (IJSNEM) publishes original scientific investigations and scholarly reviews offering new insights into sport nutrition and exercise metabolism, as well as articles focusing on the application of the principles of biochemistry, physiology, and nutrition to sport and exercise. The journal also offers editorials, digests of related articles from other fields, research notes, and reviews of books, videos, and other media releases. To subscribe to either the print or e-version of IJSNEM, press the Subscribe or Renew button at the top of your screen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信