{"title":"Blood Samples from Midline Catheters: Clinically Equivalent to Venipuncture.","authors":"Craig Minor, Amy Pfeiffer","doi":"10.1097/NAN.0000000000000527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PowerGlide Pro™ Midline Catheters, manufactured by Becton Dickinson, are marketed as capable of obtaining blood specimens. However, there is insufficient research to validate the laboratory results collected from these specialty catheters. The purpose of this research study was to determine whether blood samples obtained via venipuncture and samples obtained directly from a midline catheter are clinically equivalent. A qualitative study was completed per recommendations published in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards EP-05-A3 to determine whether the 2 modalities are clinically equivalent. A 12-point correlation study was performed, comparing blood results from phlebotomy venipuncture and midline catheter blood draws for 20 successful participants. Results were compared with an EP Evaluator. Report interpretation was completed using the 2-instrument comparison module to determine whether the 2 methods were clinically equivalent. All correlated specimens resulted within the medically acceptable total allowable error, proving the 2 methods clinically equivalent. The study concluded that blood draws from midline catheters are clinically equivalent to venipuncture and are an acceptable form of specimen collection for laboratory studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PowerGlide Pro™ Midline Catheters, manufactured by Becton Dickinson, are marketed as capable of obtaining blood specimens. However, there is insufficient research to validate the laboratory results collected from these specialty catheters. The purpose of this research study was to determine whether blood samples obtained via venipuncture and samples obtained directly from a midline catheter are clinically equivalent. A qualitative study was completed per recommendations published in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards EP-05-A3 to determine whether the 2 modalities are clinically equivalent. A 12-point correlation study was performed, comparing blood results from phlebotomy venipuncture and midline catheter blood draws for 20 successful participants. Results were compared with an EP Evaluator. Report interpretation was completed using the 2-instrument comparison module to determine whether the 2 methods were clinically equivalent. All correlated specimens resulted within the medically acceptable total allowable error, proving the 2 methods clinically equivalent. The study concluded that blood draws from midline catheters are clinically equivalent to venipuncture and are an acceptable form of specimen collection for laboratory studies.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Infusion Nursing, the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), seeks to promote excellence in infusion nursing by presenting new research, clinical reviews, case studies, and professional development information relevant to the practice of infusion therapy. Articles selected for publication represent the broad scope of the infusion specialty and draw on the expertise of all healthcare providers who participate in the delivery of infusion therapy.