Blood Samples from Midline Catheters: Clinically Equivalent to Venipuncture.

IF 2.9 Q1 NURSING
Craig Minor, Amy Pfeiffer
{"title":"Blood Samples from Midline Catheters: Clinically Equivalent to Venipuncture.","authors":"Craig Minor, Amy Pfeiffer","doi":"10.1097/NAN.0000000000000527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PowerGlide Pro™ Midline Catheters, manufactured by Becton Dickinson, are marketed as capable of obtaining blood specimens. However, there is insufficient research to validate the laboratory results collected from these specialty catheters. The purpose of this research study was to determine whether blood samples obtained via venipuncture and samples obtained directly from a midline catheter are clinically equivalent. A qualitative study was completed per recommendations published in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards EP-05-A3 to determine whether the 2 modalities are clinically equivalent. A 12-point correlation study was performed, comparing blood results from phlebotomy venipuncture and midline catheter blood draws for 20 successful participants. Results were compared with an EP Evaluator. Report interpretation was completed using the 2-instrument comparison module to determine whether the 2 methods were clinically equivalent. All correlated specimens resulted within the medically acceptable total allowable error, proving the 2 methods clinically equivalent. The study concluded that blood draws from midline catheters are clinically equivalent to venipuncture and are an acceptable form of specimen collection for laboratory studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PowerGlide Pro™ Midline Catheters, manufactured by Becton Dickinson, are marketed as capable of obtaining blood specimens. However, there is insufficient research to validate the laboratory results collected from these specialty catheters. The purpose of this research study was to determine whether blood samples obtained via venipuncture and samples obtained directly from a midline catheter are clinically equivalent. A qualitative study was completed per recommendations published in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards EP-05-A3 to determine whether the 2 modalities are clinically equivalent. A 12-point correlation study was performed, comparing blood results from phlebotomy venipuncture and midline catheter blood draws for 20 successful participants. Results were compared with an EP Evaluator. Report interpretation was completed using the 2-instrument comparison module to determine whether the 2 methods were clinically equivalent. All correlated specimens resulted within the medically acceptable total allowable error, proving the 2 methods clinically equivalent. The study concluded that blood draws from midline catheters are clinically equivalent to venipuncture and are an acceptable form of specimen collection for laboratory studies.

从中线导管采集血液样本:中线导管血液样本:临床效果等同于静脉穿刺
由 Becton Dickinson 生产的 PowerGlide Pro™ 中线导管在市场上可以采集血液标本。然而,目前还没有足够的研究来验证从这些专用导管收集到的实验室结果。本研究的目的是确定通过静脉穿刺获得的血液样本与直接从中线导管获得的样本在临床上是否相同。根据临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)标准 EP-05-A3 中公布的建议完成了一项定性研究,以确定这两种方式是否具有临床等效性。我们对 20 名成功的参与者进行了 12 点相关性研究,比较了抽血疗法静脉穿刺和中线导管抽血的血液结果。结果与 EP 评估仪进行了比较。使用双仪器比较模块完成报告解读,以确定两种方法是否具有临床等效性。所有相关标本的结果都在医学上可接受的总允许误差范围内,证明这两种方法在临床上是等效的。研究得出结论,从中线导管抽血在临床上等同于静脉穿刺,是一种可接受的实验室研究标本采集方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Journal of Infusion Nursing, the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), seeks to promote excellence in infusion nursing by presenting new research, clinical reviews, case studies, and professional development information relevant to the practice of infusion therapy. Articles selected for publication represent the broad scope of the infusion specialty and draw on the expertise of all healthcare providers who participate in the delivery of infusion therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信