Racial disparities across multiple stages of the deceased organ donation process

IF 8.9 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
{"title":"Racial disparities across multiple stages of the deceased organ donation process","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2023.12.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pervasive structural violence causes higher organ failure rates among Black Americans and excess Black potential deceased organ donors. Underuse of Black donors would exacerbate organ shortages that disproportionately harm Black transplant candidates. This study investigates racial differences in transit between distinct donation steps among 132 968 potential donors across 557 hospitals and 6 Organ Procurement<span> Organizations (OPOs) from 2015 through 2021. Multilevel multistate modeling with patient covariates and OPO random effects shows adjusted likelihoods (95% confidence interval [CI]) of non-Black versus Black patients transitioning from OPO referral to approach: odds ratio (OR) 1.23 (95% CI 1.18, 1.27), approach to authorization: OR 1.64 (95% CI 1.56, 1.72), authorization to procurement: OR 1.08 (95% CI 1.02, 1.14), and procurement to transplant: OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.93, 1.04). Overall organ utilization rates for Black, Latino, White, and other OPO referrals were 5.88%, 8.17%, 6.78%, and 5.24%, respectively. Adjusting for patient covariates and hospital and OPO random effects, multilevel logistic models estimated that compared with Black patients, Latino, White, and other patients had ORs of organ utilization of 1.82 (95% CI 1.61, 2.04), 3.19 (95% CI 2.91, 3.50), and 1.25 (95% CI 1.06, 1.47), respectively. Nationwide in 2022, donor conversion disparities likely lost more than 1800 donors—70% of whom would have been Black. Achieving racial equity for transplant candidates will require reducing racial disparities in organ donation.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"24 11","pages":"Pages 2034-2044"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613524000686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pervasive structural violence causes higher organ failure rates among Black Americans and excess Black potential deceased organ donors. Underuse of Black donors would exacerbate organ shortages that disproportionately harm Black transplant candidates. This study investigates racial differences in transit between distinct donation steps among 132 968 potential donors across 557 hospitals and 6 Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) from 2015 through 2021. Multilevel multistate modeling with patient covariates and OPO random effects shows adjusted likelihoods (95% confidence interval [CI]) of non-Black versus Black patients transitioning from OPO referral to approach: odds ratio (OR) 1.23 (95% CI 1.18, 1.27), approach to authorization: OR 1.64 (95% CI 1.56, 1.72), authorization to procurement: OR 1.08 (95% CI 1.02, 1.14), and procurement to transplant: OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.93, 1.04). Overall organ utilization rates for Black, Latino, White, and other OPO referrals were 5.88%, 8.17%, 6.78%, and 5.24%, respectively. Adjusting for patient covariates and hospital and OPO random effects, multilevel logistic models estimated that compared with Black patients, Latino, White, and other patients had ORs of organ utilization of 1.82 (95% CI 1.61, 2.04), 3.19 (95% CI 2.91, 3.50), and 1.25 (95% CI 1.06, 1.47), respectively. Nationwide in 2022, donor conversion disparities likely lost more than 1800 donors—70% of whom would have been Black. Achieving racial equity for transplant candidates will require reducing racial disparities in organ donation.
已故器官捐献过程多个阶段的种族差异。
普遍存在的结构性暴力导致美国黑人的器官衰竭率较高,以及潜在的黑人器官捐献者过多。对黑人器官捐献者的利用不足会加剧器官短缺,对黑人器官移植候选人造成不成比例的伤害。本研究调查了从 2015 年到 2021 年期间,557 家医院和 6 家器官获取组织(OPO)的 132968 名潜在捐献者在不同捐献步骤之间的种族差异。利用患者协变量和 OPO 随机效应建立的多层次多州模型显示,非黑人患者与黑人患者从 OPO 转介到接近的调整可能性[95% 置信区间]为 1.39 [1.35,1.44],接近到授权的调整可能性[95% 置信区间]为 1.64 [1.56,1.44]:1.64 [1.56,1.72],授权到采购:1.10 [1.04,1.16],采购到移植:1.00 [0.95,1.06].黑人、拉丁裔、白人和其他 OPO 转诊患者的总体器官利用率分别为 5.89%、8.18%、6.79% 和 5.24%。在调整了患者协变量以及医院和 OPO 随机效应后,多层次逻辑模型估计,与黑人患者相比,拉丁裔、白人和其他患者的器官利用率分别为 1.81 [1.61,2.03]、3.19 [2.91,3.50]和 1.24 [1.05,1.47]。2022 年,全国可能会因供体转换差异而失去 1700 多名供体--其中三分之二本应是黑人。要实现移植候选者的种族公平,就必须减少器官捐献中的种族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信