Effects of urbanization and forest type on species composition and diversity, forest characteristics, biomass carbon sink, and their associations in Changchun, Northeast China: implications for urban carbon stock improvement

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Yuanyuan Wang, Xinzhu Dai, Xingling Chen, Dan Zhang, Guiqing Lin, Yuanhang Zhou, Tianyi Wang, Yulong Cui
{"title":"Effects of urbanization and forest type on species composition and diversity, forest characteristics, biomass carbon sink, and their associations in Changchun, Northeast China: implications for urban carbon stock improvement","authors":"Yuanyuan Wang, Xinzhu Dai, Xingling Chen, Dan Zhang, Guiqing Lin, Yuanhang Zhou, Tianyi Wang, Yulong Cui","doi":"10.1007/s11676-023-01688-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Differences in forest attributes and carbon sequestration of each organ and layer between broadleaved and conifer forests of central and outer urban areas are not well-defined, hindering the precise management of urban forests and improvement of function. To clarify the effect of two forest types with different urbanization intensities, we determined differences in vegetation composition and diversity, structural traits, and carbon stocks of 152 plots (20 m × 20 m) in urban park forests in Changchun, which had the largest green quantity and carbon density effectiveness. We found that 1.1-fold thicker and healthier trees, and 1.6- to 2.0-fold higher, healthier, denser, and more various shrubs but with sparser trees and herbs occurred in the central urban forests (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) than in the outer forests. The conifer forests exhibited 30–70% obviously higher tree aboveground carbon sequestration (including stem and leaf) and 20% bigger trees, especially in the outer forests (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). In contrast, 1.1- to 1.5-fold higher branch stocks, healthier and more diverse trees were found in broadleaved forests of both the inner and outer forests (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Plant size and dominant species had similarly important roles in carbon stock improvement, especially big-sized woody plants and <i>Pinus tabuliformis.</i> In addition, a higher number of deciduous or needle species positively affected the broadleaved forest of the central urban area and conifer forest of the outer urban area, respectively. These findings can be used to guide precise management and accelerate the improvement of urban carbon function in Northeast China in the future. </p>","PeriodicalId":15830,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forestry Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forestry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01688-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differences in forest attributes and carbon sequestration of each organ and layer between broadleaved and conifer forests of central and outer urban areas are not well-defined, hindering the precise management of urban forests and improvement of function. To clarify the effect of two forest types with different urbanization intensities, we determined differences in vegetation composition and diversity, structural traits, and carbon stocks of 152 plots (20 m × 20 m) in urban park forests in Changchun, which had the largest green quantity and carbon density effectiveness. We found that 1.1-fold thicker and healthier trees, and 1.6- to 2.0-fold higher, healthier, denser, and more various shrubs but with sparser trees and herbs occurred in the central urban forests (p < 0.05) than in the outer forests. The conifer forests exhibited 30–70% obviously higher tree aboveground carbon sequestration (including stem and leaf) and 20% bigger trees, especially in the outer forests (p < 0.05). In contrast, 1.1- to 1.5-fold higher branch stocks, healthier and more diverse trees were found in broadleaved forests of both the inner and outer forests (p < 0.05). Plant size and dominant species had similarly important roles in carbon stock improvement, especially big-sized woody plants and Pinus tabuliformis. In addition, a higher number of deciduous or needle species positively affected the broadleaved forest of the central urban area and conifer forest of the outer urban area, respectively. These findings can be used to guide precise management and accelerate the improvement of urban carbon function in Northeast China in the future.

Abstract Image

城市化与森林类型对东北长春物种组成与多样性、森林特征、生物质碳汇及其关联的影响:对改善城市碳储量的启示
城市中心区和外围区阔叶林和针叶林的森林属性和各器官、各层固碳量的差异尚不十分明确,阻碍了城市森林的精确管理和功能提升。为了明确不同城市化强度的两种森林类型的影响,我们测定了长春市绿量和碳密度效益最大的城市公园森林中 152 个地块(20 m × 20 m)的植被组成和多样性、结构特征和碳储量的差异。我们发现,与外围森林相比,城市中心森林的乔木更茂密、更健康,是外围森林的 1.1 倍;灌木更高、更健康、更密集、更多样,是外围森林的 1.6 至 2.0 倍,但乔木和草本植物更稀疏(p < 0.05)。针叶林的树木地上碳吸收量(包括茎叶)明显增加了 30-70%,树木的体积增大了 20%,尤其是在外围森林(p < 0.05)。相比之下,内层和外层阔叶林的枝条储量高出 1.1-1.5 倍,树木更健康、更多样化(p < 0.05)。植物的大小和优势树种对碳储量的提高也有同样重要的作用,尤其是大规格木本植物和红松。此外,较多的落叶树种或针叶树种分别对城市中心区的阔叶林和城市外围区的针叶林产生了积极影响。这些研究结果可用于指导未来的精确管理,并加速改善中国东北地区的城市碳功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
2538
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forestry Research (JFR), founded in 1990, is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal in English. JFR has rapidly emerged as an international journal published by Northeast Forestry University and Ecological Society of China in collaboration with Springer Verlag. The journal publishes scientific articles related to forestry for a broad range of international scientists, forest managers and practitioners.The scope of the journal covers the following five thematic categories and 20 subjects: Basic Science of Forestry, Forest biometrics, Forest soils, Forest hydrology, Tree physiology, Forest biomass, carbon, and bioenergy, Forest biotechnology and molecular biology, Forest Ecology, Forest ecology, Forest ecological services, Restoration ecology, Forest adaptation to climate change, Wildlife ecology and management, Silviculture and Forest Management, Forest genetics and tree breeding, Silviculture, Forest RS, GIS, and modeling, Forest management, Forest Protection, Forest entomology and pathology, Forest fire, Forest resources conservation, Forest health monitoring and assessment, Wood Science and Technology, Wood Science and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信