Explaining neural networks without access to training data

IF 4.3 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sascha Marton, Stefan Lüdtke, Christian Bartelt, Andrej Tschalzev, Heiner Stuckenschmidt
{"title":"Explaining neural networks without access to training data","authors":"Sascha Marton, Stefan Lüdtke, Christian Bartelt, Andrej Tschalzev, Heiner Stuckenschmidt","doi":"10.1007/s10994-023-06428-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We consider generating explanations for neural networks in cases where the network’s training data is not accessible, for instance due to privacy or safety issues. Recently, Interpretation Nets (<span>\\(\\mathcal {I}\\)</span>-Nets) have been proposed as a sample-free approach to post-hoc, global model interpretability that does not require access to training data. They formulate interpretation as a machine learning task that maps network representations (parameters) to a representation of an interpretable function. In this paper, we extend the <span>\\(\\mathcal {I}\\)</span>-Net framework to the cases of standard and soft decision trees as surrogate models. We propose a suitable decision tree representation and design of the corresponding <span>\\(\\mathcal {I}\\)</span>-Net output layers. Furthermore, we make <span>\\(\\mathcal {I}\\)</span>-Nets applicable to real-world tasks by considering more realistic distributions when generating the <span>\\(\\mathcal {I}\\)</span>-Net’s training data. We empirically evaluate our approach against traditional global, post-hoc interpretability approaches and show that it achieves superior results when the training data is not accessible.</p>","PeriodicalId":49900,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-023-06428-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We consider generating explanations for neural networks in cases where the network’s training data is not accessible, for instance due to privacy or safety issues. Recently, Interpretation Nets (\(\mathcal {I}\)-Nets) have been proposed as a sample-free approach to post-hoc, global model interpretability that does not require access to training data. They formulate interpretation as a machine learning task that maps network representations (parameters) to a representation of an interpretable function. In this paper, we extend the \(\mathcal {I}\)-Net framework to the cases of standard and soft decision trees as surrogate models. We propose a suitable decision tree representation and design of the corresponding \(\mathcal {I}\)-Net output layers. Furthermore, we make \(\mathcal {I}\)-Nets applicable to real-world tasks by considering more realistic distributions when generating the \(\mathcal {I}\)-Net’s training data. We empirically evaluate our approach against traditional global, post-hoc interpretability approaches and show that it achieves superior results when the training data is not accessible.

Abstract Image

在无法获取训练数据的情况下解释神经网络
我们考虑在由于隐私或安全等问题而无法获取网络训练数据的情况下为神经网络生成解释。最近,有人提出了解释网(Interpretation Nets),作为一种无需样本的事后全局模型可解释性方法,它不需要访问训练数据。它们将解释表述为一项机器学习任务,将网络表述(参数)映射到可解释函数的表述中。在本文中,我们将 \(\mathcal {I}\)-Net 框架扩展到标准决策树和软决策树作为替代模型的情况。我们提出了一种合适的决策树表示法,并设计了相应的 \(\mathcal {I}\)-Net 输出层。此外,我们在生成网络的训练数据时考虑了更现实的分布,从而使网络适用于现实世界的任务。我们根据经验对我们的方法与传统的全局、事后可解释性方法进行了评估,结果表明,在无法获取训练数据的情况下,我们的方法取得了更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Machine Learning
Machine Learning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
2.70%
发文量
162
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Machine Learning serves as a global platform dedicated to computational approaches in learning. The journal reports substantial findings on diverse learning methods applied to various problems, offering support through empirical studies, theoretical analysis, or connections to psychological phenomena. It demonstrates the application of learning methods to solve significant problems and aims to enhance the conduct of machine learning research with a focus on verifiable and replicable evidence in published papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信