Aceptabilidad de un modelo de formulación diagnóstica de casos clínicos como estrategia educativa en una residencia de psiquiatría del niño y del adolescente

Q2 Social Sciences
Felipe Cifuentes R , Bernardo Pacheco P , Paula Bedregal , Francisca Lubi
{"title":"Aceptabilidad de un modelo de formulación diagnóstica de casos clínicos como estrategia educativa en una residencia de psiquiatría del niño y del adolescente","authors":"Felipe Cifuentes R ,&nbsp;Bernardo Pacheco P ,&nbsp;Paula Bedregal ,&nbsp;Francisca Lubi","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2023.100876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The aim of the study is to analyze the acceptability of an Integrative and Multidimensional Case Formulation Model implemented as an educational strategy in the first year of a child and adolescent psychiatry residency by a clinical supervisor within a one-way mirror room.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A qualitative methodology is used through content analysis of interviews conducted with residents of the program who had participated consecutively in clinical supervision between 2018 and 2021. For the analysis, 5 theoretical constructs derived from the Theory of Planned Behavior and Fazio's MODE Model are used: attitudes, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, motivation and opportunity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six thematic codes that influence acceptability emerged from the analysis: 8 attitudinal codes (e.g. acceptability is favored by the usefulness of the Model to gain theoretical insight of the cases but with a high amount of time required); 4 normative codes (e.g. the approval or disapproval of the model by scholars outside the clinical supervision); 7 perceived behavioral control codes (e.g. the perceived self-efficacy increases over time); 4 motivational codes (e.g. the desire to learn) and 3 opportunity codes (e.g. joint deliberation with peers).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results show valuable information for the development of educational strategies in the specialty residency program by approaching significant cognitive and affective factors which influence learning during the training periods. Aspects of the strategy that stand out as favoring the educational process are identified, along with other aspects that can be improved for better acceptability of the educational strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181323000955/pdfft?md5=9016287a73e7edcd3d36b574a8a2692d&pid=1-s2.0-S1575181323000955-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181323000955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of the study is to analyze the acceptability of an Integrative and Multidimensional Case Formulation Model implemented as an educational strategy in the first year of a child and adolescent psychiatry residency by a clinical supervisor within a one-way mirror room.

Materials and methods

A qualitative methodology is used through content analysis of interviews conducted with residents of the program who had participated consecutively in clinical supervision between 2018 and 2021. For the analysis, 5 theoretical constructs derived from the Theory of Planned Behavior and Fazio's MODE Model are used: attitudes, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, motivation and opportunity.

Results

Twenty-six thematic codes that influence acceptability emerged from the analysis: 8 attitudinal codes (e.g. acceptability is favored by the usefulness of the Model to gain theoretical insight of the cases but with a high amount of time required); 4 normative codes (e.g. the approval or disapproval of the model by scholars outside the clinical supervision); 7 perceived behavioral control codes (e.g. the perceived self-efficacy increases over time); 4 motivational codes (e.g. the desire to learn) and 3 opportunity codes (e.g. joint deliberation with peers).

Conclusion

The results show valuable information for the development of educational strategies in the specialty residency program by approaching significant cognitive and affective factors which influence learning during the training periods. Aspects of the strategy that stand out as favoring the educational process are identified, along with other aspects that can be improved for better acceptability of the educational strategy.

将临床病例诊断模式作为儿童和青少年精神病学住院医师教育策略的可接受性。
引言本研究旨在分析儿童与青少年精神病学住院医师第一年在单向镜室中由临床督导实施的综合多维病例制定模型作为教育策略的可接受性。材料与方法通过对2018年至2021年期间连续参加临床督导的该项目住院医师进行的访谈内容分析,采用了定性方法。结果分析得出了 26 个影响可接受性的主题代码:8 个态度代码(例如,可接受性取决于该模型对获得案例理论洞察力的有用性,但所需时间较长);4 个规范代码(例如,可接受性取决于该模型的可接受性,但所需时间较长);4 个动机代码(例如,可接受性取决于该模型的可接受性,但所需时间较长);4 个动机代码(例如,可接受性取决于该模型的可接受性,但所需时间较长);4 个动机代码(例如,可接受性取决于该模型的可接受性,但所需时间较长);4 个动机代码(例如,可接受性取决于该模型的可接受性,但所需时间较长)。结论 通过研究影响培训期间学习的重要认知和情感因素,研究结果为制定专科住院医师培训项目的教育策略提供了有价值的信息。研究还确定了有利于教育过程的策略方面,以及可以改进的其他方面,以提高教育策略的可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信