Problem solving team interventions: Web-based and consultant-based experimental evaluations

IF 3.8 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101279

Thomas R. Kratochwill , Jennifer M. Asmus , Clarissa Schienebeck , Elizabeth Dohrn , Joel R. Levin , Alexandra Puk Ament , Elizabeth Hagermoser-Bayley , Brittany Bice-Urbach , Megan Willes , Dana Sorensen , Leroy Williams , Lionel Alvarez , Jackie Roessler

{"title":"Problem solving team interventions: Web-based and consultant-based experimental evaluations","authors":"Thomas R. Kratochwill , Jennifer M. Asmus , Clarissa Schienebeck , Elizabeth Dohrn , Joel R. Levin , Alexandra Puk Ament , Elizabeth Hagermoser-Bayley , Brittany Bice-Urbach , Megan Willes , Dana Sorensen , Leroy Williams , Lionel Alvarez , Jackie Roessler","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research was designed to develop, implement, and evaluate an assessment and intervention protocol to increase problem-solving teams' (PSTs) adoption and implementation of evidence-based practices aimed at students with disruptive behavior problems. Participants included 15 PSTs. Adopting single-case design methodology, we examined whether a customized set of assessment and intervention consultant-led intervention procedures could be used to improve the activities, process, and recommendations of PSTs compared to a web-based intervention. We were interested in evaluating two variations of the problem-solving model based on the team initiated problem-solving (TIPS) approach. TIPS includes steps to successful problem solving and solution implementation for student academic and behavioral concerns. Based on visual analysis and statistical randomization tests, we found that a teleconsultation web-based model of PST intervention was not effective in improving the functioning of the PST. In contrast, a customized, consultation-led intervention model with PST facilitators that followed this approach was found to be effective in improving both the foundation and thoroughness of the PST's problem solving. Implications of future PST improvement models for practice and research are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 101279"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440523001073","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was designed to develop, implement, and evaluate an assessment and intervention protocol to increase problem-solving teams' (PSTs) adoption and implementation of evidence-based practices aimed at students with disruptive behavior problems. Participants included 15 PSTs. Adopting single-case design methodology, we examined whether a customized set of assessment and intervention consultant-led intervention procedures could be used to improve the activities, process, and recommendations of PSTs compared to a web-based intervention. We were interested in evaluating two variations of the problem-solving model based on the team initiated problem-solving (TIPS) approach. TIPS includes steps to successful problem solving and solution implementation for student academic and behavioral concerns. Based on visual analysis and statistical randomization tests, we found that a teleconsultation web-based model of PST intervention was not effective in improving the functioning of the PST. In contrast, a customized, consultation-led intervention model with PST facilitators that followed this approach was found to be effective in improving both the foundation and thoroughness of the PST's problem solving. Implications of future PST improvement models for practice and research are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

解决问题团队干预：基于网络和顾问的实验评估

本研究旨在开发、实施和评估一项评估和干预方案，以提高问题解决小组（PSTs）对针对有破坏性行为问题的学生的循证实践的采用和实施。参与者包括 15 个问题解决小组。采用单一案例设计方法，我们研究了与基于网络的干预相比，一套定制的评估和干预顾问主导的干预程序是否可以用来改进问题解决小组的活动、过程和建议。我们有兴趣评估基于团队发起的问题解决（TIPS）方法的问题解决模式的两种变体。TIPS 包括针对学生的学业和行为问题成功解决问题和实施解决方案的步骤。根据直观分析和统计随机测试，我们发现基于远程咨询网络的 PST 干预模式对改善 PST 的运作效果不佳。与此相反，一种由 PST 促进者参与、以咨询为主导的定制干预模式却能有效改善 PST 解决问题的基础和彻底性。本文讨论了未来 PST 改进模式对实践和研究的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

8.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.