Practitioner safety and the application of learning theory related to injury risk in equine physiotherapy: A worldwide survey

Kirsten J. Ruffoni , Bryony E. Lancaster , Gillian Tabor
{"title":"Practitioner safety and the application of learning theory related to injury risk in equine physiotherapy: A worldwide survey","authors":"Kirsten J. Ruffoni ,&nbsp;Bryony E. Lancaster ,&nbsp;Gillian Tabor","doi":"10.1016/j.eqre.2023.100005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the equine physiotherapy profession, similarly to the equine veterinary profession, there may be a high risk of occupational injury and preventive strategies, such as the application of learning theory (LT), may mitigate workplace injury frequency. The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency of occupational injury among equine physiotherapists and investigate the relationship between injury rate and knowledge of LT. An online survey was distributed, receiving 64 valid responses: of these, 51 were qualified veterinary physiotherapists working with equines and their data were taken forward for analysis. The mean injury frequency was 0.59 ± 1 per year, with 36 respondents reporting at least one injury during their career. There was a moderate negative correlation (r = –0.34, 95 %CI[–0.56,–0.07], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) between career length (in years) and injury frequency. The most common site of injury for practitioners was the lower limb (n = 22) and the most common type of injury was bruising (n = 32). Of the respondents who claimed the work activity they were performing significantly contributed to their most severe injury, six were carrying out equine hindlimb treatment at the time of injury. Knowledge of LT was poor: only 21 of respondents scored 3/9 or higher when tested on scenario-based application of LT and 24 achieved a grade of 6/10 or higher on theoretical knowledge, with one respondent achieving 0/10. There was a moderate positive correlation (<em>r</em> = 0.37, 95 %CI[0.10,0.58], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) between veterinary physiotherapists’ theoretical knowledge scores and their self-evaluation of LT terminology scores. There was no significant correlation between scenario-based and theoretical LT scores and injury frequency. However, there was a weak negative correlation (<em>r</em> = –0.31, 95 %CI[–0.54,–0.04], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) between self-evaluation of LT terminology scores and injury frequency. Due to the small number of responses, results from the present study are not representative of the target population. However, results nonetheless highlight a trend of high injury rates and low levels of understanding of equine learning. This is comparable to other equine-related professions, indicating the urgent need of research into better prevention and safety-enhancing strategies, which could reduce the rates of occupational injury and safeguard the welfare of both practitioners and equines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949905423000051/pdfft?md5=2b3feded27b503b0283ac92916dd3c27&pid=1-s2.0-S2949905423000051-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949905423000051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the equine physiotherapy profession, similarly to the equine veterinary profession, there may be a high risk of occupational injury and preventive strategies, such as the application of learning theory (LT), may mitigate workplace injury frequency. The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency of occupational injury among equine physiotherapists and investigate the relationship between injury rate and knowledge of LT. An online survey was distributed, receiving 64 valid responses: of these, 51 were qualified veterinary physiotherapists working with equines and their data were taken forward for analysis. The mean injury frequency was 0.59 ± 1 per year, with 36 respondents reporting at least one injury during their career. There was a moderate negative correlation (r = –0.34, 95 %CI[–0.56,–0.07], p < 0.05) between career length (in years) and injury frequency. The most common site of injury for practitioners was the lower limb (n = 22) and the most common type of injury was bruising (n = 32). Of the respondents who claimed the work activity they were performing significantly contributed to their most severe injury, six were carrying out equine hindlimb treatment at the time of injury. Knowledge of LT was poor: only 21 of respondents scored 3/9 or higher when tested on scenario-based application of LT and 24 achieved a grade of 6/10 or higher on theoretical knowledge, with one respondent achieving 0/10. There was a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.37, 95 %CI[0.10,0.58], p < 0.01) between veterinary physiotherapists’ theoretical knowledge scores and their self-evaluation of LT terminology scores. There was no significant correlation between scenario-based and theoretical LT scores and injury frequency. However, there was a weak negative correlation (r = –0.31, 95 %CI[–0.54,–0.04], p < 0.05) between self-evaluation of LT terminology scores and injury frequency. Due to the small number of responses, results from the present study are not representative of the target population. However, results nonetheless highlight a trend of high injury rates and low levels of understanding of equine learning. This is comparable to other equine-related professions, indicating the urgent need of research into better prevention and safety-enhancing strategies, which could reduce the rates of occupational injury and safeguard the welfare of both practitioners and equines.

从业人员的安全以及与马匹物理治疗中受伤风险相关的学习理论的应用:全球调查
在马匹物理治疗行业,与马匹兽医行业类似,可能存在很高的工伤风险,而应用学习理论(LT)等预防策略可以降低工伤频率。本研究旨在确定马匹物理治疗师的工伤频率,并调查工伤率与学习理论知识之间的关系。研究人员发放了一份在线调查问卷,共收到 64 份有效回复:其中 51 人是从事马科动物工作的合格兽医物理治疗师,他们的数据将被用于分析。平均受伤频率为每年 0.59 ± 1 次,36 名受访者表示在其职业生涯中至少受过一次伤。从业时间(年)与受伤频率之间存在中度负相关(r = -0.34,95 %CI[-0.56,-0.07],p <0.05)。从业人员最常见的受伤部位是下肢(22 人),最常见的受伤类型是瘀伤(32 人)。在声称所从事的工作是导致其最严重受伤的重要原因的受访者中,有 6 人在受伤时正在进行马后肢治疗。受访者对LT的了解程度较低:在对LT的情景应用进行测试时,只有21名受访者获得了3/9或更高的分数,24名受访者的理论知识达到了6/10或更高的分数,1名受访者的理论知识为0/10。兽医物理治疗师的理论知识得分与他们对LT术语的自我评价得分之间存在中度正相关(r = 0.37, 95 %CI[0.10,0.58], p <0.01)。LT情景评分和理论评分与受伤频率之间没有明显的相关性。然而,LT术语自我评价得分与受伤频率之间存在微弱的负相关(r = -0.31,95 %CI[-0.54,-0.04],p <0.05)。由于回答的人数较少,本研究的结果并不能代表目标人群。不过,研究结果还是凸显了高受伤率和低马术学习理解水平的趋势。这与其他与马相关的职业不相上下,表明迫切需要研究更好的预防和安全强化策略,从而降低职业伤害率,保障从业人员和马匹的福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信