Seher Şener, Özge Başaran, Ezgi Deniz Batu, Müşerref Kasap Cüceoğlu, Zeynep Balık, Emil Aliyev, Yağmur Bayındır, Yelda Bilginer, Seza Özen
{"title":"Choice and switch of biologic drugs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.","authors":"Seher Şener, Özge Başaran, Ezgi Deniz Batu, Müşerref Kasap Cüceoğlu, Zeynep Balık, Emil Aliyev, Yağmur Bayındır, Yelda Bilginer, Seza Özen","doi":"10.24953/turkjped.2023.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to evaluate choices and changes of biologic drugs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients according to disease subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed JIA patients who received biologic treatment between January 2004 and July 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 294 JIA patients, 80 (27.2%) had systemic JIA, 68 (23.1%) had oligoarticular JIA, 61 (20.7%) had polyarticular JIA, 79 (26.9%) had enthesitis-associated arthritis (ERA), and six (2.1%) had psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Anakinra (n=66, 82.5%) was the most commonly preferred first line biologic in systemic JIA. Etanercept was the most frequently used biologic drug in patients with ERA (n=69, 87.3%), oligoarticular (n=37, 54.4%) and polyarticular JIA (n=43, 70.5%). Adalimumab was used as a first-line biologic drug in all PsA patients (n=6, 100%). One hundred-fourteen patients (38.8%) were switched to second-line and 29 (9.9%) to third-line biologic drugs. While the most common reason for switching to a second-line biologic was difficulty in usage of daily injections (n=37, 60.6%) in systemic JIA patients, it was an inadequate response to first biologics in non-systemic JIA patients (n=42, 79.2%). Side effects were detected in only seven patients (2.4%) during the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we revealed the biologic drug usage and switch strategies in our JIA patients. Good responses were obtained in most of our patients with a reliable profile. However, studies on larger patient groups are needed to clarify these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":101314,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish journal of pediatrics","volume":"65 6","pages":"980-989"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish journal of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2023.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In this study, we aimed to evaluate choices and changes of biologic drugs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients according to disease subtypes.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed JIA patients who received biologic treatment between January 2004 and July 2022.
Results: Of 294 JIA patients, 80 (27.2%) had systemic JIA, 68 (23.1%) had oligoarticular JIA, 61 (20.7%) had polyarticular JIA, 79 (26.9%) had enthesitis-associated arthritis (ERA), and six (2.1%) had psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Anakinra (n=66, 82.5%) was the most commonly preferred first line biologic in systemic JIA. Etanercept was the most frequently used biologic drug in patients with ERA (n=69, 87.3%), oligoarticular (n=37, 54.4%) and polyarticular JIA (n=43, 70.5%). Adalimumab was used as a first-line biologic drug in all PsA patients (n=6, 100%). One hundred-fourteen patients (38.8%) were switched to second-line and 29 (9.9%) to third-line biologic drugs. While the most common reason for switching to a second-line biologic was difficulty in usage of daily injections (n=37, 60.6%) in systemic JIA patients, it was an inadequate response to first biologics in non-systemic JIA patients (n=42, 79.2%). Side effects were detected in only seven patients (2.4%) during the follow-up.
Conclusion: In this study, we revealed the biologic drug usage and switch strategies in our JIA patients. Good responses were obtained in most of our patients with a reliable profile. However, studies on larger patient groups are needed to clarify these results.