The Anatomy of the Mandibular Incisive Canal and Its Influence in Implant Therapy: A Scoping Review.

Juan Francisco Peña-Cardelles, Jovana Markovic, Ahmad Alanezi, Adam Hamilton, German O Gallucci, Alejandro Lanis
{"title":"The Anatomy of the Mandibular Incisive Canal and Its Influence in Implant Therapy: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Juan Francisco Peña-Cardelles, Jovana Markovic, Ahmad Alanezi, Adam Hamilton, German O Gallucci, Alejandro Lanis","doi":"10.11607/prd.6826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interforaminal region is considered more favorable for implant placement than the posterior mandible in edentulous patients, mainly because the inferior alveolar nerve can interfere with implant placement in the severely resorbed posterior mandible. However, complications in the interforaminal region may occur due to the presence of the mandibular incisive nerve. This scoping review aims to describe the mandibular incisive nerve anatomy related to the potential interference in implant therapy. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Scopus. This scoping review was structured according to the Joanna Briggs Institute method. Thirteen studies were included in the review. All of the studies were observational cohort anatomical studies, carried out mainly by CBCT and on cadavers. A total of 1,471 patients/cadavers were studied. The mandibular incisive nerve was present in 87% to 100% of cases, with an average length of 9.97 mm and an average diameter of 1.97 mm. The mandibular incisive nerve may be damaged during drilling and implant placement, especially when using implant lengths > 12 mm. Damage to the mandibular incisive nerve due to implant placement could be present, but it is necessary to conduct more studies focusing on assessing mandibular incisive nerve damage to understand the clinical relevance of this nerve and its associated morbidities, such as neurosensorial alterations. Due to the different anatomical characteristics of this nerve, CBCT analysis is recommended for implant therapy in the anterior mandible to prevent the described complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"709-719"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interforaminal region is considered more favorable for implant placement than the posterior mandible in edentulous patients, mainly because the inferior alveolar nerve can interfere with implant placement in the severely resorbed posterior mandible. However, complications in the interforaminal region may occur due to the presence of the mandibular incisive nerve. This scoping review aims to describe the mandibular incisive nerve anatomy related to the potential interference in implant therapy. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Scopus. This scoping review was structured according to the Joanna Briggs Institute method. Thirteen studies were included in the review. All of the studies were observational cohort anatomical studies, carried out mainly by CBCT and on cadavers. A total of 1,471 patients/cadavers were studied. The mandibular incisive nerve was present in 87% to 100% of cases, with an average length of 9.97 mm and an average diameter of 1.97 mm. The mandibular incisive nerve may be damaged during drilling and implant placement, especially when using implant lengths > 12 mm. Damage to the mandibular incisive nerve due to implant placement could be present, but it is necessary to conduct more studies focusing on assessing mandibular incisive nerve damage to understand the clinical relevance of this nerve and its associated morbidities, such as neurosensorial alterations. Due to the different anatomical characteristics of this nerve, CBCT analysis is recommended for implant therapy in the anterior mandible to prevent the described complications.

下颌切迹管的解剖及其对种植治疗的影响。范围综述。
导言:在无牙颌患者中,齿间区被认为比下颌后部更适合植入种植体,这主要是因为在严重吸收的下颌后部植入种植体会受到下牙槽神经的干扰。然而,由于下颌切迹神经的存在,在齿间区域可能会出现并发症:本综述旨在描述下颌切迹神经解剖与种植治疗的潜在干扰有关:在以下数据库中进行了全面的文献检索:材料: 在以下数据库中进行了全面的文献检索:MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、Web of Science 和 Scopus。根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的方法构建了该范围综述:结果:13 项研究被纳入综述。所有研究均为观察性队列解剖研究,主要通过 CBCT 和尸体进行。共研究了 1471 名患者/尸体。87%-100%的病例存在下颌切迹神经,平均长度为 9.97 毫米,平均直径为 1.97 毫米。下颌切迹神经可能会在钻孔和种植体植入过程中受损,尤其是种植体长度大于 12 毫米时:下颌切迹神经可能会因种植体植入而受到损伤,但有必要进行更多的研究,重点评估下颌切迹神经损伤,以了解该神经的临床意义及其相关病症,如神经感觉改变。由于该神经的解剖特点不同,建议在下颌前部进行种植治疗时进行 CBCT 分析,以防止出现上述并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信