Meaningfulness and mortality: exploring the sense of coherence in Eastern Finnish men.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1177/14034948231220091
Ilkka Piiroinen, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen, Tommi Tolmunen, Ari Voutilainen
{"title":"Meaningfulness and mortality: exploring the sense of coherence in Eastern Finnish men.","authors":"Ilkka Piiroinen, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen, Tommi Tolmunen, Ari Voutilainen","doi":"10.1177/14034948231220091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The sense of coherence scale has been shown to have an epidemiological relationship with mortality. This study aimed to investigate how the three components of sense of coherence (meaningfulness, comprehensibility and manageability) and the individual items of these components relate to mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eastern Finnish men (<i>n</i>=2315) aged 42-60 years at baseline in the 1980s completed a 12-item sense of coherence scale and were followed for 25 years, on average, until death or until the end of 2019. Hazard ratios for mortality were calculated using two models: one adjusted for age and the second for an additional 12 mortality risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the three sense of coherence components, only meaningfulness was associated with all-cause mortality, and in the fully adjusted model, those in the weakest tertile had a 1.14 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.29, <i>P</i>=0.042) times higher hazard ratio for mortality than those in the strongest tertile. Of the individual sense of coherence items, only the first question, 'How often do you have the feeling that you really don't care about what is going on around you?', was associated with all-cause mortality, and in the fully adjusted Cox model, the hazard ratio of weak versus strong was 1.18 (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.36, <i>P</i>=0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>The sense of coherence component related to meaningfulness, including its first item, 'Caring about what goes on around you', plays a significant role in the association with mortality among middle-aged men in Eastern Finland. This item should be considered a noteworthy patient-reported variable when predicting mortality in public health settings.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948231220091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The sense of coherence scale has been shown to have an epidemiological relationship with mortality. This study aimed to investigate how the three components of sense of coherence (meaningfulness, comprehensibility and manageability) and the individual items of these components relate to mortality.

Methods: Eastern Finnish men (n=2315) aged 42-60 years at baseline in the 1980s completed a 12-item sense of coherence scale and were followed for 25 years, on average, until death or until the end of 2019. Hazard ratios for mortality were calculated using two models: one adjusted for age and the second for an additional 12 mortality risk factors.

Results: Of the three sense of coherence components, only meaningfulness was associated with all-cause mortality, and in the fully adjusted model, those in the weakest tertile had a 1.14 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.29, P=0.042) times higher hazard ratio for mortality than those in the strongest tertile. Of the individual sense of coherence items, only the first question, 'How often do you have the feeling that you really don't care about what is going on around you?', was associated with all-cause mortality, and in the fully adjusted Cox model, the hazard ratio of weak versus strong was 1.18 (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.36, P=0.020).

Conclusions: The sense of coherence component related to meaningfulness, including its first item, 'Caring about what goes on around you', plays a significant role in the association with mortality among middle-aged men in Eastern Finland. This item should be considered a noteworthy patient-reported variable when predicting mortality in public health settings.

意义与死亡:探索东芬兰男性的连贯感。
目的:一致性感量表已被证明与死亡率有流行病学关系。本研究旨在调查连贯感的三个组成部分(有意义性、可理解性和可管理性)以及这些组成部分的各个项目与死亡率之间的关系:方法:20世纪80年代基线年龄为42-60岁的芬兰东部男性(n=2315)填写了一份由12个项目组成的连贯感量表,并接受了平均长达25年的跟踪调查,直至死亡或2019年底。采用两个模型计算死亡率的危险比:一个模型根据年龄进行调整,另一个模型根据另外 12 个死亡风险因素进行调整:在一致性的三个组成部分中,只有 "有意义 "与全因死亡率相关,在完全调整模型中,最弱三等分组的死亡率危险比是最强三等分组的1.14倍(95%置信区间为1.01-1.29,P=0.042)。在一致性感觉的各个项目中,只有第一个问题 "您多长时间会有一种感觉,您真的不在乎周围发生的事情?"与全因死亡率相关,在完全调整后的 Cox 模型中,弱与强的危险比为 1.18(95% 置信区间 1.03-1.36,P=0.020): 与 "有意义 "相关的 "连贯性 "部分,包括其第一项 "关心周围发生的事情",在与芬兰东部中年男性死亡率的关联中起着重要作用。在预测公共卫生环境中的死亡率时,该项目应被视为一个值得注意的患者报告变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信