The Effectiveness of Cognitive-Focused Interventions for Adults With Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Western Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1177/01939459231221939
Bohyun Kim, Jie Hu
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Cognitive-Focused Interventions for Adults With Diabetes: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Bohyun Kim, Jie Hu","doi":"10.1177/01939459231221939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with diabetes and impaired memory and executive functions are more likely to experience difficulties in diabetes self-management and achieving glycemic targets. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence of the effects of cognitive-focused interventions on cognitive ability, diabetes self-management, and management of glycemic levels for middle-aged adults and older adults with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of randomized controlled/clinical trials published in English between 2012 and 2022 was conducted. A search was performed using 5 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) in addition to hand-searching. The search terms included diabetes, adults, cognitive-focused intervention, cognition, self-management, and hemoglobin A<sub>1C</sub> (HbA<sub>1C</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Cognitive ability and diabetes self-management were assessed using different measurements, and glycemic levels were measured with HbA<sub>1C</sub>. Nine studies applied cognitive training, one provided working memory training, and one used occupational therapy. Eight studies combined cognitive training with a co-intervention, including self-efficacy, lifestyle management, physical training, chronic disease self-management program, square-stepping exercise, psychoeducational intervention, and empowerment. Eight studies showed statistically significant improvements in at least one cognitive domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive-focused interventions have a positive effect on improving memory and executive function. However, the evidence of cognitive-focused interventions on diabetes self-management and glycemic levels has not been established. Future studies to improve cognition using effective strategies to improve cognitive function enhancing diabetes self-management behaviors and managing glycemic levels are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459231221939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adults with diabetes and impaired memory and executive functions are more likely to experience difficulties in diabetes self-management and achieving glycemic targets. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence of the effects of cognitive-focused interventions on cognitive ability, diabetes self-management, and management of glycemic levels for middle-aged adults and older adults with diabetes.

Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled/clinical trials published in English between 2012 and 2022 was conducted. A search was performed using 5 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) in addition to hand-searching. The search terms included diabetes, adults, cognitive-focused intervention, cognition, self-management, and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C).

Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Cognitive ability and diabetes self-management were assessed using different measurements, and glycemic levels were measured with HbA1C. Nine studies applied cognitive training, one provided working memory training, and one used occupational therapy. Eight studies combined cognitive training with a co-intervention, including self-efficacy, lifestyle management, physical training, chronic disease self-management program, square-stepping exercise, psychoeducational intervention, and empowerment. Eight studies showed statistically significant improvements in at least one cognitive domain.

Conclusions: Cognitive-focused interventions have a positive effect on improving memory and executive function. However, the evidence of cognitive-focused interventions on diabetes self-management and glycemic levels has not been established. Future studies to improve cognition using effective strategies to improve cognitive function enhancing diabetes self-management behaviors and managing glycemic levels are warranted.

针对成人糖尿病患者的认知干预的有效性:系统回顾
背景:患有糖尿病且记忆和执行功能受损的成年人更有可能在糖尿病自我管理和实现血糖目标方面遇到困难。本系统性综述旨在评估以认知为重点的干预措施对中老年糖尿病患者的认知能力、糖尿病自我管理和血糖管理的影响:方法: 对 2012 年至 2022 年间用英语发表的随机对照/临床试验进行了系统回顾。除手工检索外,还使用了 5 个数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus)进行检索。检索词包括糖尿病、成人、认知干预、认知、自我管理和血红蛋白A1C(HbA1C):结果:11 项研究符合纳入标准。认知能力和糖尿病自我管理采用不同的测量方法进行评估,血糖水平采用 HbA1C 进行测量。九项研究采用了认知训练,一项提供了工作记忆训练,一项采用了职业疗法。八项研究将认知训练与一项共同干预措施相结合,包括自我效能、生活方式管理、体能训练、慢性病自我管理计划、广场舞锻炼、心理教育干预和赋权。八项研究显示,至少在一个认知领域有统计学意义的改善:结论:以认知为重点的干预对改善记忆和执行功能有积极作用。然而,以认知为重点的干预对糖尿病自我管理和血糖水平的影响尚未得到证实。今后有必要开展研究,利用有效策略改善认知功能,加强糖尿病自我管理行为和控制血糖水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信