Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Recep Yükçü, Sinem Kars, Meral Huri
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire.","authors":"Recep Yükçü, Sinem Kars, Meral Huri","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2024.050378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sensory processing difficulties are commonly seen in people with mental disorders. However, no questionnaires specific to Turkish culture are available for people with mental disorders.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire (SRQ).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Causal comparative groups design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Homes, clinics, hospitals, and therapy practices in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 913 participants, of whom 529 were participants ages 18-60 yr with mental disorders.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>The cross-cultural adaptation and translation procedures were conducted following Beaton's guidelines. Internal consistency was examined with Cronbach's α. Criterion-related validity of the SRQ was determined with the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile using construct validity and was examined by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 23) and AMOS (Version 24.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In CFA, model fit indices showed an acceptable fit. Test-retest reliability was excellent for the hedonic and avoidance subfactor scores and for the total score (intraclass correlation coefficients = .973, .988, and .974, respectively). Internal consistency was high for the hedonic subfactor (.812) and the avoidance subfactor (.815). Participants with bipolar disorder had the highest scores on the hedonic subfactor, whereas those with schizophrenia had the highest scores on the avoidance subfactor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The 36-item SRQ is reliable and valid for analyzing the sensory processing abilities of adults in the Turkish population. Plain-Language Summary: People with mental disorders commonly have difficulties with sensory processing. No sensory responsiveness questionnaire specific to the Turkish population or culture is available for people with mental disorders. This study shows that the current form of the Turkish Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire can contribute to understanding the sensory processing abilities of Turkish people with and without mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Sensory processing difficulties are commonly seen in people with mental disorders. However, no questionnaires specific to Turkish culture are available for people with mental disorders.

Objective: To examine the cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire (SRQ).

Design: Causal comparative groups design.

Setting: Homes, clinics, hospitals, and therapy practices in Turkey.

Participants: A total of 913 participants, of whom 529 were participants ages 18-60 yr with mental disorders.

Outcomes and measures: The cross-cultural adaptation and translation procedures were conducted following Beaton's guidelines. Internal consistency was examined with Cronbach's α. Criterion-related validity of the SRQ was determined with the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile using construct validity and was examined by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 23) and AMOS (Version 24.0).

Results: In CFA, model fit indices showed an acceptable fit. Test-retest reliability was excellent for the hedonic and avoidance subfactor scores and for the total score (intraclass correlation coefficients = .973, .988, and .974, respectively). Internal consistency was high for the hedonic subfactor (.812) and the avoidance subfactor (.815). Participants with bipolar disorder had the highest scores on the hedonic subfactor, whereas those with schizophrenia had the highest scores on the avoidance subfactor.

Conclusions and relevance: The 36-item SRQ is reliable and valid for analyzing the sensory processing abilities of adults in the Turkish population. Plain-Language Summary: People with mental disorders commonly have difficulties with sensory processing. No sensory responsiveness questionnaire specific to the Turkish population or culture is available for people with mental disorders. This study shows that the current form of the Turkish Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire can contribute to understanding the sensory processing abilities of Turkish people with and without mental disorders.

土耳其感官反应性问卷的跨文化适应性、可靠性和有效性。
重要性:感官处理障碍常见于精神障碍患者。然而,目前还没有专门针对土耳其文化的精神障碍患者问卷:研究土耳其感官反应性问卷(SRQ)的文化适应性、可靠性和有效性:设计:因果比较组设计:环境:土耳其的家庭、诊所、医院和治疗机构:共有 913 名参与者,其中 529 人为 18-60 岁的精神障碍患者:跨文化改编和翻译程序按照比顿指南进行。内部一致性采用 Cronbach's α 进行检验。使用 IBM SPSS Statistics(23 版)和 AMOS(24.0 版)通过确认性因子分析(CFA)确定了 SRQ 与青少年/成人感官档案的标准相关有效性:在 CFA 中,模型拟合指数显示拟合度可以接受。享乐子因子得分和回避子因子得分以及总分的重测可靠性极佳(类内相关系数分别为 0.973、0.988 和 0.974)。享乐子因子(.812)和逃避子因子(.815)的内部一致性较高。双相情感障碍患者在享乐子因子上得分最高,而精神分裂症患者在逃避子因子上得分最高:36项SRQ对于分析土耳其成年人的感觉处理能力是可靠有效的。通俗摘要:精神障碍患者通常在感觉处理方面存在困难。目前还没有专门针对土耳其人口或文化的精神障碍患者感官反应能力问卷。本研究表明,当前形式的土耳其感官反应能力问卷有助于了解土耳其精神障碍患者和非精神障碍患者的感官处理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信