Insole Pressure Sensors to Assess Post-Stroke Gait.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI:10.5535/arm.23064
Hyung Seok Nam, Caitlin Clancy, Matthew Smuck, Maarten G Lansberg
{"title":"Insole Pressure Sensors to Assess Post-Stroke Gait.","authors":"Hyung Seok Nam, Caitlin Clancy, Matthew Smuck, Maarten G Lansberg","doi":"10.5535/arm.23064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To confirm that the simplified insole does not affect the gait speed and to identify objective sensor-based gait parameters that correlate strongly with existing clinical gait assessment scales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten participants with gait impairment due to hemiplegic stroke were enrolled in this study. Pairs of insoles with four pressure sensors on each side were manufactured and placed in each shoe. Data were extracted during the 10-Meter Walk Test. Several sensor-derived parameters (for example stance time, heel_on-to-toe_peak time, and toe_peak pressure) were calculated and correlated with gait speed and lower extremity Fugl-Meyer (F-M) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The insole pressure sensor did not affect gait, as indicated by a strong correlation (ρ=0.988) and high agreement (ICC=0.924) between the gait speeds with and without the insole. The parameters that correlated most strongly with highest β coefficients against the clinical measures were stance time of the non-hemiplegic leg (β=-0.87 with F-M and β=-0.95 with gait speed) and heel_on-to-toe_peak time of the non-hemiplegic leg (β=-0.86 with F-M and -0.94 with gait speed).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stance time of the non-hemiparetic leg correlates most strongly with clinical measures and can be assessed using a non-obtrusive insole pressure sensor that does not affect gait function. These results suggest that an insole pressure sensor, which is applicable in a home environment, may be useful as a clinical endpoint in post-stroke gait therapy trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":47738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","volume":" ","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.23064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To confirm that the simplified insole does not affect the gait speed and to identify objective sensor-based gait parameters that correlate strongly with existing clinical gait assessment scales.

Methods: Ten participants with gait impairment due to hemiplegic stroke were enrolled in this study. Pairs of insoles with four pressure sensors on each side were manufactured and placed in each shoe. Data were extracted during the 10-Meter Walk Test. Several sensor-derived parameters (for example stance time, heel_on-to-toe_peak time, and toe_peak pressure) were calculated and correlated with gait speed and lower extremity Fugl-Meyer (F-M) score.

Results: The insole pressure sensor did not affect gait, as indicated by a strong correlation (ρ=0.988) and high agreement (ICC=0.924) between the gait speeds with and without the insole. The parameters that correlated most strongly with highest β coefficients against the clinical measures were stance time of the non-hemiplegic leg (β=-0.87 with F-M and β=-0.95 with gait speed) and heel_on-to-toe_peak time of the non-hemiplegic leg (β=-0.86 with F-M and -0.94 with gait speed).

Conclusion: Stance time of the non-hemiparetic leg correlates most strongly with clinical measures and can be assessed using a non-obtrusive insole pressure sensor that does not affect gait function. These results suggest that an insole pressure sensor, which is applicable in a home environment, may be useful as a clinical endpoint in post-stroke gait therapy trials.

评估中风后步态的鞋垫压力传感器
目的确认简易鞋垫不会影响步速,并确定与现有临床步态评估量表密切相关的客观传感器步态参数:方法:本研究招募了十名因中风偏瘫导致步态障碍的参与者。研究人员制作了两双鞋垫,每双鞋垫上各有四个压力传感器。在 10 米步行测试中提取数据。结果显示,鞋垫压力传感器并没有影响中风后遗症患者的行走速度和下肢Fugl-Meyer(F-M)评分:鞋垫压力传感器对步态没有影响,使用鞋垫和不使用鞋垫时的步态速度之间具有很强的相关性(ρ=0.988)和很高的一致性(ICC=0.924)。非偏瘫腿的站立时间(β=-0.87,与F-M相关,β=-0.95,与步速相关)和非偏瘫腿的足跟到趾峰时间(β=-0.86,与F-M相关,-0.94,与步速相关)与临床测量的β系数相关性最强:结论:非偏瘫腿的站立时间与临床测量结果的相关性最强,可使用不影响步态功能的非侵入性鞋垫压力传感器进行评估。这些结果表明,鞋垫压力传感器适用于家庭环境,可作为中风后步态治疗试验的临床终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信