Morgan Leske, Christina Galanis, Bogda Koczwara, Lisa Beatty
{"title":"A meta-analysis of healthy lifestyle interventions addressing quality of life of cancer survivors in the post treatment phase.","authors":"Morgan Leske, Christina Galanis, Bogda Koczwara, Lisa Beatty","doi":"10.1007/s11764-023-01514-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study's primary aim was to investigate whether including a mental health component to healthy lifestyle interventions are associated with greater effects on quality of life (QoL) for post-treatment cancer survivors than addressing physical activity and/or nutrition alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PsycINFO, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched to identify randomised control trials of healthy lifestyle interventions for post-treatment cancer survivors, with a usual care or waitlist control, and measured QoL. Meta-analyses quantified the effects of interventions vs controls at post-treatment on total QoL, physical, emotional, and social well-being. Subgroup analyses compared interventions with vs without a mental health component, modes of delivery, and duration. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-eight papers evaluating 110 interventions were included: 66 effect sizes were extracted for meta-analysis, and 22 papers were narratively synthesised. The pooled effect size demonstrated a small, significant effect of healthy lifestyle interventions in comparison to control for all QoL outcomes (total g = 0.32, p >.001; physical g = 0.19, p = 0.05; emotional g = 0.20, p >.001; social g = 0.18, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between interventions with vs without a mental health component. Face-to-face delivered interventions were associated with greater total QoL and physical well-being compared to other modalities. Interventions delivered ≤12 weeks were associated with greater physical well-being than those delivered ≥13 weeks. Overall, studies had substantial levels of heterogeneity and 55.9% demonstrated high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participating in a healthy lifestyle intervention following cancer treatment improves QoL. Few trials addressed mental health or evaluated online or telephone modalities; future research should develop and evaluate interventions that utilise these features.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Brief healthy lifestyle interventions can be recommended for cancer survivors, particularly those interested in improving physical well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":"940-956"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01514-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study's primary aim was to investigate whether including a mental health component to healthy lifestyle interventions are associated with greater effects on quality of life (QoL) for post-treatment cancer survivors than addressing physical activity and/or nutrition alone.
Methods: PsycINFO, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched to identify randomised control trials of healthy lifestyle interventions for post-treatment cancer survivors, with a usual care or waitlist control, and measured QoL. Meta-analyses quantified the effects of interventions vs controls at post-treatment on total QoL, physical, emotional, and social well-being. Subgroup analyses compared interventions with vs without a mental health component, modes of delivery, and duration. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.
Results: Eighty-eight papers evaluating 110 interventions were included: 66 effect sizes were extracted for meta-analysis, and 22 papers were narratively synthesised. The pooled effect size demonstrated a small, significant effect of healthy lifestyle interventions in comparison to control for all QoL outcomes (total g = 0.32, p >.001; physical g = 0.19, p = 0.05; emotional g = 0.20, p >.001; social g = 0.18, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between interventions with vs without a mental health component. Face-to-face delivered interventions were associated with greater total QoL and physical well-being compared to other modalities. Interventions delivered ≤12 weeks were associated with greater physical well-being than those delivered ≥13 weeks. Overall, studies had substantial levels of heterogeneity and 55.9% demonstrated high risk of bias.
Conclusions: Participating in a healthy lifestyle intervention following cancer treatment improves QoL. Few trials addressed mental health or evaluated online or telephone modalities; future research should develop and evaluate interventions that utilise these features.
Implications for cancer survivors: Brief healthy lifestyle interventions can be recommended for cancer survivors, particularly those interested in improving physical well-being.
目的:本研究的主要目的是调查在健康生活方式干预措施中加入心理健康内容是否会比单纯的体育锻炼和/或营养干预措施对癌症治疗后幸存者的生活质量(QoL)产生更大的影响:对 PsycINFO、Scopus、Medline、CINAHL 和 Google Scholar 进行了检索,以确定针对癌症治疗后幸存者的健康生活方式干预的随机对照试验,试验采用常规护理或候补对照,并对 QoL 进行了测量。元分析量化了治疗后干预与对照对总 QoL、身体、情感和社会福祉的影响。分组分析比较了有无心理健康内容的干预措施、实施方式和持续时间。纳入研究的质量采用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 进行评估:结果:共纳入了 88 篇论文,对 110 项干预措施进行了评估:提取了 66 个效应大小进行荟萃分析,并对 22 篇论文进行了叙述性综合。汇总的效应大小显示,与对照组相比,健康生活方式干预对所有 QoL 结果都有微小而显著的影响(总效应 g = 0.32,p >.001;生理效应 g = 0.19,p = 0.05;情感效应 g = 0.20,p >.001;社交效应 g = 0.18,p = 0.01)。有心理健康内容的干预与没有心理健康内容的干预之间没有明显差异。与其他方式相比,面对面的干预与更高的总体 QoL 和身体健康相关。与≥13周的干预相比,≤12周的干预与更高的身体健康相关。总体而言,这些研究存在很大的异质性,55.9%的研究显示存在高偏倚风险:结论:癌症治疗后参与健康生活方式干预可提高生活质量。很少有试验涉及心理健康或评估在线或电话模式;未来的研究应开发和评估利用这些特点的干预措施:对癌症幸存者的启示:可以向癌症幸存者推荐简短的健康生活方式干预,尤其是那些对改善身体健康感兴趣的人。
期刊介绍:
Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.