The Agreement between Consumer-Driven Self-Assessment of Psoriasis Severity and Physician-Assessed Severity Based on Patient-Taken Photographs Is Weak: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1159/000536175
Zarqa Ali, Ali Al-Mousawi, Benóný Þór Björnsson, Alexander Egeberg, Christian Riemer, Simon Francis Thomsen
{"title":"The Agreement between Consumer-Driven Self-Assessment of Psoriasis Severity and Physician-Assessed Severity Based on Patient-Taken Photographs Is Weak: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Zarqa Ali, Ali Al-Mousawi, Benóný Þór Björnsson, Alexander Egeberg, Christian Riemer, Simon Francis Thomsen","doi":"10.1159/000536175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital advancements have given access to huge amounts of real-world data (RWD) widely used for dermatological research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate the agreement between consumer-driven self-assessed psoriasis severity and physician-assessed severity based on photographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Customer IDs in the NØIE database (Danish skincare company) from 2009 to 2022 with a smartphone photograph of psoriasis vulgaris on the body and a corresponding completed questionnaire were included. Smartphone photographs were evaluated by a physician-assessing erythema, induration, and scaling on a scale from 0 to 4 based on Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). Self-assessment was done on a scale from 0 to 10 and converted to 0-4 scale (0 converted to 0; 1-3 to 1; 4-6 to 2; 7-8 to 3; and 9-10 to 4). Intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 187 patients (63% women) with mean age of 38 years were included. Self-assessment scores were higher than physicians' assessment scores for all groups, and scaling was closest to the physicians' assessment, while erythema and induration had a greater distance between the physicians' and patients' assessment. The correlation between self-assessed and physician-assessed psoriasis severity for all patients was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.0-0.92); 0.34 (95% CI: 0.0-0.95) for chronic patients; and 0.09 (-0.01 to 0.82) for non-chronic patients. The agreement was better for men (0.53 [-0.02 to 0.98]) than for women (0.12 [-0.01 to 0.84]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was weak agreement between self-assessed psoriasis severity and photographically assessed severity by the physician. Consumer-driven RWD should be interpreted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"362-368"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Digital advancements have given access to huge amounts of real-world data (RWD) widely used for dermatological research.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the agreement between consumer-driven self-assessed psoriasis severity and physician-assessed severity based on photographs.

Methods: Customer IDs in the NØIE database (Danish skincare company) from 2009 to 2022 with a smartphone photograph of psoriasis vulgaris on the body and a corresponding completed questionnaire were included. Smartphone photographs were evaluated by a physician-assessing erythema, induration, and scaling on a scale from 0 to 4 based on Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). Self-assessment was done on a scale from 0 to 10 and converted to 0-4 scale (0 converted to 0; 1-3 to 1; 4-6 to 2; 7-8 to 3; and 9-10 to 4). Intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: In total, 187 patients (63% women) with mean age of 38 years were included. Self-assessment scores were higher than physicians' assessment scores for all groups, and scaling was closest to the physicians' assessment, while erythema and induration had a greater distance between the physicians' and patients' assessment. The correlation between self-assessed and physician-assessed psoriasis severity for all patients was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.0-0.92); 0.34 (95% CI: 0.0-0.95) for chronic patients; and 0.09 (-0.01 to 0.82) for non-chronic patients. The agreement was better for men (0.53 [-0.02 to 0.98]) than for women (0.12 [-0.01 to 0.84]).

Conclusion: There was weak agreement between self-assessed psoriasis severity and photographically assessed severity by the physician. Consumer-driven RWD should be interpreted with caution.

消费者对银屑病严重程度的自我评估与医生根据患者拍摄的照片对严重程度的评估之间的一致性较弱:横断面研究。
简介:数字技术的进步使人们能够获得大量真实世界数据(RWD),这些数据被广泛用于皮肤病研究:数字技术的进步使人们可以获得大量真实世界数据(RWD),这些数据被广泛用于皮肤病研究:调查消费者自我评估的银屑病严重程度与医生根据照片评估的严重程度之间的一致性:方法:纳入 Nøie 数据库(丹麦护肤品公司)中 2009 年至 2022 年使用智能手机拍摄的身体寻常型银屑病照片和相应填写的调查问卷的客户 ID。智能手机照片由一名医生进行评估,根据银屑病面积严重程度指数(PASI),以 0-4 分来评估红斑、压痕和鳞屑。自我评估采用 0-10 分制,并转换为 0-4 分制(0 分制转换为 0;1-3 分制转换为 1;4-6 分制转换为 2;7-8 分制转换为 3;9-10 分制转换为 4)。计算了带 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的类内相关系数 (ICC):共纳入 187 名患者(63% 为女性),平均年龄为 38 岁。在所有组别中,自我评估得分均高于医生评估得分,鳞屑与医生评估最接近,而红斑和压痕则与医生和患者的评估相差较大。所有患者的自我评估与医生评估的银屑病严重程度之间的相关性为 0.23(95% CI 0.0-0.92);慢性患者的相关性为 0.34(95% CI 0.0-0.95),非慢性患者的相关性为 0.09(-0.01-0.82)。男性的一致性为 0.53(-0.02-0.98),高于女性的 0.12(-0.01-0.84):结论:自我评估的银屑病严重程度与医生通过照片评估的严重程度之间的一致性较弱。消费者驱动的 RWD 应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatology
Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信