Cytotoxicity evaluation, antibacterial effect, and degree of conversion of QAM-containing adhesives.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-01-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0001
Isadora Martini Garcia, Tatiana Féres Assad-Loss, Luis Felipe Jochinms Schneider, Fabrício Mezzomo Collares, Larissa Maria Assad Cavalcante, Mônica Almeida Tostes
{"title":"Cytotoxicity evaluation, antibacterial effect, and degree of conversion of QAM-containing adhesives.","authors":"Isadora Martini Garcia, Tatiana Féres Assad-Loss, Luis Felipe Jochinms Schneider, Fabrício Mezzomo Collares, Larissa Maria Assad Cavalcante, Mônica Almeida Tostes","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of adding quaternary ammonium methacrylates (QAMs) to experimental adhesives by assessing the degree of conversion (DC), cytotoxicity against keratinocytes and fibroblasts, and antibacterial activity against biofilm formation. Two QAMs were added to an experimental adhesive: dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate bromododecane (DMADDM) or dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate bromohexadecane (DMAHDM) at three concentrations each: 1, 2.5, and 5 wt.%. Experimental adhesive without QAMs (control group) and commercially available Transbond XT Primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) were used for comparisons. The adhesives were tested for DC, cytotoxicity against keratinocytes and fibroblasts, and antibacterial activity against biofilm formation. DC, cytotoxicity against fibroblasts, and antibacterial activity were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons. Cytotoxicity against keratinocytes was evaluated using the Kruskal Wallis and Dunn's post-hoc (α = 5%) tests. Transbond showed lower DC as compared to 5% DMAHDM, 1% DMADDM, and 5% DMADDM (p < 0.05). However, all groups presented proper DC when compared to commercial adhesives in the literature. In the evaluation of cytotoxicity against keratinocytes, Transbond induced higher viability than 2.5 wt.% groups (p < 0.05). Against fibroblasts, Transbond induced higher viability as compared to 5 wt.% groups (p < 0.05). DMAHDM at 5 wt.% reduced biofilm formation when compared to all the other groups (p < 0.05). Despite their cytotoxic effect against keratinocytes, gingival fibroblasts showed higher viability. DMAHDM at 5 wt.% decreased Streptococcus mutans viability. The incorporation of DMAHDM at 5 wt.% may be a strategy for reducing the development of white spot lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of adding quaternary ammonium methacrylates (QAMs) to experimental adhesives by assessing the degree of conversion (DC), cytotoxicity against keratinocytes and fibroblasts, and antibacterial activity against biofilm formation. Two QAMs were added to an experimental adhesive: dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate bromododecane (DMADDM) or dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate bromohexadecane (DMAHDM) at three concentrations each: 1, 2.5, and 5 wt.%. Experimental adhesive without QAMs (control group) and commercially available Transbond XT Primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) were used for comparisons. The adhesives were tested for DC, cytotoxicity against keratinocytes and fibroblasts, and antibacterial activity against biofilm formation. DC, cytotoxicity against fibroblasts, and antibacterial activity were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons. Cytotoxicity against keratinocytes was evaluated using the Kruskal Wallis and Dunn's post-hoc (α = 5%) tests. Transbond showed lower DC as compared to 5% DMAHDM, 1% DMADDM, and 5% DMADDM (p < 0.05). However, all groups presented proper DC when compared to commercial adhesives in the literature. In the evaluation of cytotoxicity against keratinocytes, Transbond induced higher viability than 2.5 wt.% groups (p < 0.05). Against fibroblasts, Transbond induced higher viability as compared to 5 wt.% groups (p < 0.05). DMAHDM at 5 wt.% reduced biofilm formation when compared to all the other groups (p < 0.05). Despite their cytotoxic effect against keratinocytes, gingival fibroblasts showed higher viability. DMAHDM at 5 wt.% decreased Streptococcus mutans viability. The incorporation of DMAHDM at 5 wt.% may be a strategy for reducing the development of white spot lesions.

含 QAM 粘合剂的细胞毒性评估、抗菌效果和转化程度。
本研究旨在通过评估粘合剂的转化率(DC)、对角质细胞和成纤维细胞的细胞毒性以及对生物膜形成的抗菌活性,来评估在实验粘合剂中添加甲基丙烯酸季铵(QAM)的影响。实验粘合剂中添加了两种 QAM:甲基丙烯酸二甲胺十二烷基溴十二烷(DMADDM)或甲基丙烯酸二甲胺十二烷基溴十六烷(DMAHDM),浓度分别为 1、2.5 和 5:1、2.5 和 5 wt.%。不含 QAMs 的实验粘合剂(对照组)和市售的 Transbond XT 底漆(3M Unitek,美国加利福尼亚州蒙罗维亚)用于比较。对粘合剂进行了直流电、针对角质细胞和成纤维细胞的细胞毒性以及针对生物膜形成的抗菌活性测试。采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey's 多重比较对直流电、对成纤维细胞的细胞毒性和抗菌活性进行了分析。对角质细胞的细胞毒性采用 Kruskal Wallis 和 Dunn's 事后检验(α = 5%)进行评估。与 5% DMAHDM、1% DMADDM 和 5% DMADDM 相比,Transbond 显示出较低的 DC(p < 0.05)。不过,与文献中的商用粘合剂相比,所有组的 DC 值都适当。在评估对角质细胞的细胞毒性时,Transbond 组比 2.5 wt.% 组具有更高的存活率(p < 0.05)。与 5 wt.% 组相比,Transbond 对成纤维细胞的诱导活力更高(p < 0.05)。与所有其他组相比,5 wt.% 的 DMAHDM 可减少生物膜的形成(p < 0.05)。尽管它们对角质形成细胞有细胞毒性作用,但牙龈成纤维细胞的存活率更高。5 wt.% 的 DMAHDM 可降低变异链球菌的活力。添加 5 wt.% 的 DMAHDM 可能是减少白斑病变的一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信