Efficacy of EDTA-NS irrigation in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-associated infection.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Junqing Lin, Jinlong Suo, Bingbo Bao, Haifeng Wei, Tao Gao, Hongyi Zhu, Xianyou Zheng
{"title":"Efficacy of EDTA-NS irrigation in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-associated infection.","authors":"Junqing Lin, Jinlong Suo, Bingbo Bao, Haifeng Wei, Tao Gao, Hongyi Zhu, Xianyou Zheng","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.131.BJR-2023-0141.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-normal saline (EDTA-NS) in dispersing biofilms and reducing bacterial infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EDTA-NS solutions were irrigated at different durations (1, 5, 10, and 30 minutes) and concentrations (1, 2, 5, 10, and 50 mM) to disrupt <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> biofilms on Matrigel-coated glass and two materials widely used in orthopaedic implants (Ti-6Al-4V and highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE)). To assess the efficacy of biofilm dispersion, crystal violet staining biofilm assay and colony counting after sonification and culturing were performed. The results were further confirmed and visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). We then investigated the efficacies of EDTA-NS irrigation in vivo in rat and pig models of biofilm-associated infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When 10 mM or higher EDTA-NS concentrations were used for ten minutes, over 99% of <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm formed on all three types of materials was eradicated in terms of absorbance measured at 595 nm and colony-forming units (CFUs) after culturing. Consistently, SEM and CSLM scanning demonstrated that less adherence of <i>S. aureus</i> could be observed on all three types of materials after 10 mM EDTA-NS irrigation for ten minutes. In the rat model, compared with NS irrigation combined with rifampin (Ti-6Al-4V wire-implanted rats: 60% bacteria survived; HXLPE particle-implanted rats: 63.3% bacteria survived), EDTA-NS irrigation combined with rifampin produced the highest removal rate (Ti-6Al-4V wire-implanted rats: 3.33% bacteria survived; HXLPE particle-implanted rats: 6.67% bacteria survived). In the pig model, compared with NS irrigation combined with rifampin (Ti-6Al-4V plates: 75% bacteria survived; HXLPE bearings: 87.5% bacteria survived), we observed a similar level of biofilm disruption on Ti-6Al-4V plates (25% bacteria survived) and HXLPE bearings (37.5% bacteria survived) after EDTA-NS irrigation combined with rifampin. The in vivo study revealed that the biomass of <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm was significantly reduced when treated with rifampin following irrigation and debridement, as indicated by both the biofilm bacterial burden and crystal violet staining. EDTA-NS irrigation (10 mM/10 min) combined with rifampin effectively removes <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm-associated infections both in vitro and in vivo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EDTA-NS irrigation with or without antibiotics is effective in eradicating <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm-associated infection both ex and in vivo.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"40-51"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10781521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.131.BJR-2023-0141.R1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the efficacy of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-normal saline (EDTA-NS) in dispersing biofilms and reducing bacterial infections.

Methods: EDTA-NS solutions were irrigated at different durations (1, 5, 10, and 30 minutes) and concentrations (1, 2, 5, 10, and 50 mM) to disrupt Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on Matrigel-coated glass and two materials widely used in orthopaedic implants (Ti-6Al-4V and highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE)). To assess the efficacy of biofilm dispersion, crystal violet staining biofilm assay and colony counting after sonification and culturing were performed. The results were further confirmed and visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). We then investigated the efficacies of EDTA-NS irrigation in vivo in rat and pig models of biofilm-associated infection.

Results: When 10 mM or higher EDTA-NS concentrations were used for ten minutes, over 99% of S. aureus biofilm formed on all three types of materials was eradicated in terms of absorbance measured at 595 nm and colony-forming units (CFUs) after culturing. Consistently, SEM and CSLM scanning demonstrated that less adherence of S. aureus could be observed on all three types of materials after 10 mM EDTA-NS irrigation for ten minutes. In the rat model, compared with NS irrigation combined with rifampin (Ti-6Al-4V wire-implanted rats: 60% bacteria survived; HXLPE particle-implanted rats: 63.3% bacteria survived), EDTA-NS irrigation combined with rifampin produced the highest removal rate (Ti-6Al-4V wire-implanted rats: 3.33% bacteria survived; HXLPE particle-implanted rats: 6.67% bacteria survived). In the pig model, compared with NS irrigation combined with rifampin (Ti-6Al-4V plates: 75% bacteria survived; HXLPE bearings: 87.5% bacteria survived), we observed a similar level of biofilm disruption on Ti-6Al-4V plates (25% bacteria survived) and HXLPE bearings (37.5% bacteria survived) after EDTA-NS irrigation combined with rifampin. The in vivo study revealed that the biomass of S. aureus biofilm was significantly reduced when treated with rifampin following irrigation and debridement, as indicated by both the biofilm bacterial burden and crystal violet staining. EDTA-NS irrigation (10 mM/10 min) combined with rifampin effectively removes S. aureus biofilm-associated infections both in vitro and in vivo.

Conclusion: EDTA-NS irrigation with or without antibiotics is effective in eradicating S. aureus biofilm-associated infection both ex and in vivo.

EDTA-NS 冲洗在消除金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜相关感染方面的功效。
目的:研究乙二胺四乙酸-生理盐水(EDTA-NS)在驱散生物膜和减少细菌感染方面的功效:用不同持续时间(1、5、10 和 30 分钟)和浓度(1、2、5、10 和 50 毫摩尔)的 EDTA-NS 溶液冲洗 Matrigel 涂层玻璃和骨科植入物中广泛使用的两种材料(Ti-6Al-4V 和高交联聚乙烯 (HXLPE))上的金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜。为了评估生物膜分散的效果,在超声和培养后进行了水晶紫染色生物膜检测和菌落计数。共焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对结果进行了进一步的确认和观察。然后,我们在大鼠和猪的生物膜相关感染模型中研究了 EDTA-NS 灌溉的体内疗效:结果:当使用 10 mM 或更高浓度的 EDTA-NS 十分钟后,从 595 纳米吸光度和培养后的菌落形成单位(CFU)来看,在所有三种材料上形成的金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜 99% 以上都被清除了。同样,扫描电子显微镜和 CSLM 扫描显示,在 10 mM EDTA-NS 冲洗十分钟后,金黄色葡萄球菌在三种材料上的附着均有所减少。在大鼠模型中,与结合利福平的 NS 冲洗(Ti-6Al-4V 金属丝植入大鼠:60%的细菌存活;植入 HXLPE 粒子的大鼠:63.3%的细菌存活):63.3%的细菌存活),EDTA-NS冲洗联合利福平的去除率最高(Ti-6Al-4V金属丝植入大鼠:3.33%的细菌存活;HXLPE颗粒植入大鼠:3.33%的细菌存活):植入 Ti-6Al-4V 金属丝的大鼠:3.33% 的细菌存活;植入 HXLPE 粒子的大鼠:6.67% 的细菌存活):细菌存活率为 6.67%)。在猪模型中,与结合利福平的 NS 冲洗相比(Ti-6Al-4V 板:75% 的细菌存活;HXLPE 颗粒:6.67% 的细菌存活),NS 冲洗的细菌存活率更高:细菌存活率为 75%;HXLPE 轴承:细菌存活率为 87.5%)相比,NS 冲洗和利福平联合疗法的效果更好:87.5%的细菌存活)相比,我们观察到在 EDTA-NS 冲洗联合利福平后,Ti-6Al-4V 板(25% 的细菌存活)和 HXLPE 轴承(37.5% 的细菌存活)上的生物膜破坏程度相似。体内研究显示,在灌洗和清创后使用利福平治疗,金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的生物量明显减少,生物膜细菌负荷和水晶紫染色均表明了这一点。EDTA-NS 冲洗(10 毫摩尔/10 分钟)与利福平联合使用可有效清除金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜相关的体外和体内感染:结论:无论是否使用抗生素,EDTA-NS 冲洗都能有效清除金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜相关感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信