Evidence Map of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations on Stroke Rehabilitation.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Lili Wei, Wenru Shang, Yaxing Nan, Yuming Liu, Jingyu Yang, Kehu Yang
{"title":"Evidence Map of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations on Stroke Rehabilitation.","authors":"Lili Wei, Wenru Shang, Yaxing Nan, Yuming Liu, Jingyu Yang, Kehu Yang","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The purpose of this study was to provide an evidence map for explaining research trends and gaps. Four databases and clinical practice guidelines-related Websites were searched up to March 2022. Basic information, methodological quality, reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines, and similar stroke recommendations were extracted. The methodological and reporting quality of stroke clinical practice guidelines were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (second version) instrument and the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare checklist. The bubble plot format of the evidence map helped visualize the overall quality. Data management and analysis were performed using Excel 2013 and SPSS 22.0 software. A total of 12 clinical practice guidelines, published between 1997 and 2020, were included for in-depth analysis. The identified clinical practice guidelines had a mixed quality and scored poorly in the developmental rigor and applicability domains by Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (second version). According to the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare checklist, field four (clarity of expression) showed the highest (79.2%), and field three (rigor of formulation) secured the lowest (28%) reporting rates. The stroke rehabilitation recommendations primarily focused on organizational management, timing and intensity, rehabilitation and nutritional management of dysphagia, return to work, communication, speech, and language function. This would promote improvement in developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"193-201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to provide an evidence map for explaining research trends and gaps. Four databases and clinical practice guidelines-related Websites were searched up to March 2022. Basic information, methodological quality, reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines, and similar stroke recommendations were extracted. The methodological and reporting quality of stroke clinical practice guidelines were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (second version) instrument and the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare checklist. The bubble plot format of the evidence map helped visualize the overall quality. Data management and analysis were performed using Excel 2013 and SPSS 22.0 software. A total of 12 clinical practice guidelines, published between 1997 and 2020, were included for in-depth analysis. The identified clinical practice guidelines had a mixed quality and scored poorly in the developmental rigor and applicability domains by Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (second version). According to the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare checklist, field four (clarity of expression) showed the highest (79.2%), and field three (rigor of formulation) secured the lowest (28%) reporting rates. The stroke rehabilitation recommendations primarily focused on organizational management, timing and intensity, rehabilitation and nutritional management of dysphagia, return to work, communication, speech, and language function. This would promote improvement in developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation.

卒中康复临床实践指南建议证据图。
摘要:本研究的目的是提供一份证据地图,用于解释研究趋势和差距。研究人员检索了截至 2022 年 3 月的四个数据库和 CPGs 相关网站。提取了CPG的基本信息、方法学质量、报告质量以及类似的卒中建议。使用 AGREE II 工具和 RIGHT 检查表对卒中 CPGs 的方法学和报告质量进行了评估。证据图的气泡图格式有助于直观地显示整体质量。数据管理和分析使用 Excel 2013 和 SPSS 22.0 软件进行。共纳入了 1997 年至 2020 年间发表的 12 篇 CPG 进行深入分析。所确定的 CPG 质量参差不齐,在 AGREE II 的开发严谨性和适用性领域得分较低。根据 RIGHT 检查表,第四领域(表达清晰度)的报告率最高(79.2%),第三领域(表述严谨性)的报告率最低(28%)。脑卒中康复建议主要集中在组织管理、时间和强度、吞咽困难的康复和营养管理、重返工作岗位、交流、言语和语言功能等方面。这将促进为脑卒中康复制定值得信赖的 CPGs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信