Work–life balance: Does leadership matter?

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Kareem Folohunso Sani, Toyin Ajibade Adisa
{"title":"Work–life balance: Does leadership matter?","authors":"Kareem Folohunso Sani, Toyin Ajibade Adisa","doi":"10.1108/er-03-2023-0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The extant literature on work–life balance (WLB) has generally overlooked the interrelationship between leadership and WLB. Does leadership have any impact on employees' use of WLB policies and practices? To answer this question, this article considers the social exchange theory as well as transformational and transactional leadership in an investigation of the impact of leadership on WLB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study employs qualitative data from 32 semi-structured interviews to achieve the study’s objectives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The research reveals that leadership does matter in WLB. The study findings reveal that both the transactional and transformational leadership styles result in the establishment of strong reciprocal relationships between leaders and employees in terms of using WLB policies and practices. Managers only sanction the use of WLB policies and practices only as a reward for excellent performance or when they are completely sure the outcome will favour the organisation. The study concludes that the desire to achieve WLB has often led many employees to go the extra mile in carrying out their work duties, which is rewarded with an approval to use WLB policies and practices. These non-contractual exchanges emphasise reciprocity and are based on trust.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The extent to which the findings of this research can be generalised is constrained by the size and nature of the research sample.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Many managers are transactional leaders, and they purposefully allow their employees to use WLB policies and practices only as a reward for meeting targets and for excellent performance. This means that employees who fall short of the required targets and expected performance are not permitted to use WLB policies and practices. This finding implies that such employees experience incessant work–family conflict, which may have negative implications for their work engagement, overall well-being and work performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study demonstrates that leadership is relevant to WLB. It shows that transformational leadership is supportive of WLB, as it considers employees' work performance and non-work outcomes. The results and practical implications of this study aids the understanding of the non-contractual exchanges involved in manager–employee relationships, which is crucial for ensuring employees' achievement of WLB and for organisations to achieve their goals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47857,"journal":{"name":"Employee Relations","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/er-03-2023-0145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The extant literature on work–life balance (WLB) has generally overlooked the interrelationship between leadership and WLB. Does leadership have any impact on employees' use of WLB policies and practices? To answer this question, this article considers the social exchange theory as well as transformational and transactional leadership in an investigation of the impact of leadership on WLB.

Design/methodology/approach

The study employs qualitative data from 32 semi-structured interviews to achieve the study’s objectives.

Findings

The research reveals that leadership does matter in WLB. The study findings reveal that both the transactional and transformational leadership styles result in the establishment of strong reciprocal relationships between leaders and employees in terms of using WLB policies and practices. Managers only sanction the use of WLB policies and practices only as a reward for excellent performance or when they are completely sure the outcome will favour the organisation. The study concludes that the desire to achieve WLB has often led many employees to go the extra mile in carrying out their work duties, which is rewarded with an approval to use WLB policies and practices. These non-contractual exchanges emphasise reciprocity and are based on trust.

Research limitations/implications

The extent to which the findings of this research can be generalised is constrained by the size and nature of the research sample.

Practical implications

Many managers are transactional leaders, and they purposefully allow their employees to use WLB policies and practices only as a reward for meeting targets and for excellent performance. This means that employees who fall short of the required targets and expected performance are not permitted to use WLB policies and practices. This finding implies that such employees experience incessant work–family conflict, which may have negative implications for their work engagement, overall well-being and work performance.

Originality/value

This study demonstrates that leadership is relevant to WLB. It shows that transformational leadership is supportive of WLB, as it considers employees' work performance and non-work outcomes. The results and practical implications of this study aids the understanding of the non-contractual exchanges involved in manager–employee relationships, which is crucial for ensuring employees' achievement of WLB and for organisations to achieve their goals.

工作与生活的平衡:领导力重要吗?
目的 有关工作与生活平衡(WLB)的现有文献普遍忽视了领导力与工作与生活平衡之间的相互关系。领导力对员工使用工作与生活平衡政策和实践是否有影响?为了回答这个问题,本文在研究领导力对工作与生活平衡的影响时,考虑了社会交换理论以及变革型领导力和交易型领导力。研究结果表明,无论是交易型领导还是变革型领导,都会在领导者和员工之间建立起牢固的互惠关系,从而促进员工使用 WLB 政策和实践。管理者只有在奖励员工的出色表现或完全确定其结果将有利于组织时,才会批准员工使用工LB政策和实践。研究得出的结论是,实现 WLB 的愿望往往会促使许多员工在履行工作职责时付出额外的努力,而这种努力的回报就是批准使用 WLB 政策和实践。这些非契约性的交流强调互惠,并建立在信任的基础上。研究局限/影响由于研究样本的规模和性质,本研究结果的推广程度受到限制。这就意味着,那些没有达到所要求的目标和预期绩效的员工是不被允许使用WLB政策和实践的。这一发现意味着,这些员工会不断经历工作与家庭的冲突,这可能会对他们的工作投入度、整体幸福感和工作绩效产生负面影响。本研究表明,变革型领导对 WLB 有支持作用,因为变革型领导会考虑员工的工作表现和非工作成果。本研究的结果和实际意义有助于人们理解管理者与员工关系中涉及的非契约性交流,这对于确保员工实现 WLB 和组织实现其目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Employee Relations
Employee Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.80%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: ■Communication, participation and involvement ■Developments in collective bargaining ■Equal opportunities ■Health and safety ■HRM ■Industrial relations and employment protection law ■Industrial relations management and reform ■Organizational change and people ■Personnel and recruitment ■Quality of working life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信