Evaluating conservation units using network analysis: a sea duck case study

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Juliet S Lamb, Clara Cooper-Mullin, Scott G Gilliland, Alicia M Berlin, Timothy D Bowman, W Sean Boyd, Susan EW De La Cruz, Daniel Esler, Joseph R Evenson, Paul Flint, Christine Lepage, Dustin E Meattey, Jason E Osenkowski, Peter WC Paton, Matthew C Perry, Dan Rosenberg, Jean-Pierre L Savard, Lucas Savoy, Jason Schamber, David H Ward, John Y Takekawa, Scott R McWilliams
{"title":"Evaluating conservation units using network analysis: a sea duck case study","authors":"Juliet S Lamb,&nbsp;Clara Cooper-Mullin,&nbsp;Scott G Gilliland,&nbsp;Alicia M Berlin,&nbsp;Timothy D Bowman,&nbsp;W Sean Boyd,&nbsp;Susan EW De La Cruz,&nbsp;Daniel Esler,&nbsp;Joseph R Evenson,&nbsp;Paul Flint,&nbsp;Christine Lepage,&nbsp;Dustin E Meattey,&nbsp;Jason E Osenkowski,&nbsp;Peter WC Paton,&nbsp;Matthew C Perry,&nbsp;Dan Rosenberg,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre L Savard,&nbsp;Lucas Savoy,&nbsp;Jason Schamber,&nbsp;David H Ward,&nbsp;John Y Takekawa,&nbsp;Scott R McWilliams","doi":"10.1002/fee.2648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conserving migratory wildlife requires understanding how groups of individuals interact across seasons and landscapes. Telemetry reveals individual movements at large spatiotemporal scales; however, using movement data to define conservation units requires scaling up from individual movements to species- and community-level patterns. We developed a framework to define flyways and identify important sites from telemetry data and applied it to long-term, range-wide tracking data from three species (640 individuals) of sea ducks: namely, North American scoters (<i>Melanitta</i> spp). Our network of 88 nodes included both multispecies hotspots and areas uniquely important to individual species. We found limited spatial overlap between scoters wintering on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of North America, with differing connectivity patterns between coasts. Finally, we identified four multispecies conservation units that did not correspond to traditional management flyways. From this approach, we show how individual movements can be used to quantify range-wide connectivity of migratory species and reveal gaps in conservation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2648","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conserving migratory wildlife requires understanding how groups of individuals interact across seasons and landscapes. Telemetry reveals individual movements at large spatiotemporal scales; however, using movement data to define conservation units requires scaling up from individual movements to species- and community-level patterns. We developed a framework to define flyways and identify important sites from telemetry data and applied it to long-term, range-wide tracking data from three species (640 individuals) of sea ducks: namely, North American scoters (Melanitta spp). Our network of 88 nodes included both multispecies hotspots and areas uniquely important to individual species. We found limited spatial overlap between scoters wintering on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of North America, with differing connectivity patterns between coasts. Finally, we identified four multispecies conservation units that did not correspond to traditional management flyways. From this approach, we show how individual movements can be used to quantify range-wide connectivity of migratory species and reveal gaps in conservation strategies.

利用网络分析法评估保护单位:海鸭案例研究
保护迁徙野生动物需要了解个体群体如何在不同季节和不同地貌之间相互作用。遥测揭示了个体在大时空尺度上的运动;然而,使用运动数据来定义保护单位需要从个体运动扩大到物种和群落级别的模式。我们开发了一个框架来定义飞行路线并从遥测数据中识别重要地点,并将其应用于三个物种(640 只)海鸭(即北美凫(Melanitta spp))的长期范围追踪数据。我们的网络由 88 个节点组成,既包括多物种热点,也包括对单个物种独特重要的区域。我们发现,在北美大西洋和太平洋沿岸越冬的凫类之间存在有限的空间重叠,不同海岸之间的连接模式也不尽相同。最后,我们确定了四个多物种保护单位,它们与传统的管理航道并不一致。通过这种方法,我们展示了如何利用个体运动来量化迁徙物种在整个范围内的连通性,并揭示保护战略中的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信