Performance of the NOSE Questionnaire in Mask Selection for Home CPAP Titration.

IF 1 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sleep Science Pub Date : 2023-11-22 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1776769
Magalí Blanco, Glenda Ernst, Alberto Rabino, Alejandro Salvado, Eduardo Enrique Borsini
{"title":"Performance of the NOSE Questionnaire in Mask Selection for Home CPAP Titration.","authors":"Magalí Blanco, Glenda Ernst, Alberto Rabino, Alejandro Salvado, Eduardo Enrique Borsini","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1776769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Many patients abandon CPAP treatment because they find the mask uncomfortable. Therefore, specialists may benefit from the predictive value of airway assessment tools. <b>Objective</b>  To identify nasal ventilation failure through the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who undergo home-based auto-adjusting CPAP titration and to determine whether there is a correlation between NOSE score and the type of mask selected. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  In this prospective correlational study, the NOSE scale was used in terms of mask selection and titration indicators. Patients were classified based on their NOSE score: > or < 50. <b>Results</b>  We included 303 patients; 226 men (74.5%), BMI: 33.2 ± 6.1 kg/m <sup>2</sup> , neck circumference (cm): 42.8 ± 3.6 and Epworth (ESS) score: 9.2 ± 5.6, mild OSA: 12 (3.9%), moderate OSA: 127 (41.9%), and severe OSA: 164 (54.1%). The mean NOSE score was 24.3 ± 22.8 and 42 patients (13.8%) had NOSE scores > 50. Indicators for both groups were: compliance (5.9 ± 1.3 vs. 5.8 ± 1.4 hours) p: 0.41, therapeutic pressure (9.1 ± 2.0 vs. 8.8 ± 1.6 cm of H <sub>2</sub> O) p: 0.23, residual AHI (2.3 ± 1.8 vs. 2.8 ± 2.6 events/hour) p: 0.25, and leaks (20.5 ± 10.6 vs. 21.3 ± 10.7 liters/minute) p: 0.64. According to adjusted multiple regression, a NOSE of > 50 was not a predictor of mask selection. <b>Conclusions</b>  A > 50 NOSE score was not a predictor of mask selection, and it was not correlated to titration performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"16 4","pages":"e425-e429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Many patients abandon CPAP treatment because they find the mask uncomfortable. Therefore, specialists may benefit from the predictive value of airway assessment tools. Objective  To identify nasal ventilation failure through the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who undergo home-based auto-adjusting CPAP titration and to determine whether there is a correlation between NOSE score and the type of mask selected. Materials and Methods  In this prospective correlational study, the NOSE scale was used in terms of mask selection and titration indicators. Patients were classified based on their NOSE score: > or < 50. Results  We included 303 patients; 226 men (74.5%), BMI: 33.2 ± 6.1 kg/m 2 , neck circumference (cm): 42.8 ± 3.6 and Epworth (ESS) score: 9.2 ± 5.6, mild OSA: 12 (3.9%), moderate OSA: 127 (41.9%), and severe OSA: 164 (54.1%). The mean NOSE score was 24.3 ± 22.8 and 42 patients (13.8%) had NOSE scores > 50. Indicators for both groups were: compliance (5.9 ± 1.3 vs. 5.8 ± 1.4 hours) p: 0.41, therapeutic pressure (9.1 ± 2.0 vs. 8.8 ± 1.6 cm of H 2 O) p: 0.23, residual AHI (2.3 ± 1.8 vs. 2.8 ± 2.6 events/hour) p: 0.25, and leaks (20.5 ± 10.6 vs. 21.3 ± 10.7 liters/minute) p: 0.64. According to adjusted multiple regression, a NOSE of > 50 was not a predictor of mask selection. Conclusions  A > 50 NOSE score was not a predictor of mask selection, and it was not correlated to titration performance.

NOSE 问卷在家用 CPAP 滴定法面罩选择中的表现。
导言:许多患者因为觉得面罩不舒服而放弃 CPAP 治疗。因此,专家可能会从气道评估工具的预测价值中获益。目的 通过鼻阻塞症状评估量表(NOSE)确定接受家庭自动调节 CPAP 滴定的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的鼻通气失败情况,并确定 NOSE 评分与所选面罩类型之间是否存在相关性。材料和方法 在这项前瞻性相关研究中,NOSE 量表被用于面罩选择和滴定指标。根据 NOSE 评分对患者进行分类:> 结果 我们纳入了 303 名患者;其中 226 名男性(74.5%),体重指数(BMI):33.2 ± 6.1 kg/m 2,颈围(厘米):42.8 ± 3.6,瞳孔:1.5 ± 1.5 厘米:轻度 OSA:12 人(3.9%),中度 OSA:127 人(41.9%),重度 OSA:164 人(54.1%)。平均 NOSE 分数为 24.3 ± 22.8,42 名患者(13.8%)的 NOSE 分数大于 50。两组患者的指标分别为:依从性(5.9 ± 1.3 对 5.8 ± 1.4 小时)P:0.41;治疗压力(9.1 ± 2.0 对 8.8 ± 1.6 厘米 H 2 O)P:0.23;残余 AHI(2.3 ± 1.8 对 2.8 ± 2.6 次/小时)P:0.25;渗漏(20.5 ± 10.6 对 21.3 ± 10.7 升/分钟)P:0.64。根据调整后的多元回归,NOSE > 50 不能预测喉罩的选择。结论 NOSE > 50 分并不能预测面罩选择,而且与滴定性能无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep Science
Sleep Science CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信