National frequency, trends, and healthcare burden of care fragmentation in readmissions for end-stage liver disease in the USA.

IF 1.9 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Olufunso Agbalajobi, Ebehiwele Ebhohon, Chineye B Amuchi, Edwige C Nzugang, Elizabeth O Soladoye, Oyedotun Babajide, Adeyinka C Adejumo
{"title":"National frequency, trends, and healthcare burden of care fragmentation in readmissions for end-stage liver disease in the USA.","authors":"Olufunso Agbalajobi, Ebehiwele Ebhohon, Chineye B Amuchi, Edwige C Nzugang, Elizabeth O Soladoye, Oyedotun Babajide, Adeyinka C Adejumo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03232-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>End-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients have frequent readmissions to the same facility or a different hospital (care fragmentation). Care fragmentation results in care delivery from an unfamiliar clinical team or setting, a potential source of suboptimal clinical outcomes. We examined the occurrence, trends, and association between care fragmentation and outcomes during readmissions for ESLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the Nationwide Readmissions Database (January to September 2010-2014), we followed adult (age ≥18 years) hospitalizations for ESLD who were discharged alive for 90 days. During 30- and 90-day readmissions, we calculated the frequency, determinants, and clinical outcomes of care fragmentation (SAS 9.4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 67,480 ESLD hospitalizations surviving at discharge from 2010-2014, 35% (23,872) and 52% (35,549) were readmitted in 30- and 90-days respectively. During readmissions, the frequencies of care fragmentation were similar (30-day: 25.4% and 90-day: 25.8%) and remained stable from 2010 to 2014 (P trends>0.5). Similarly, factors associated with care fragmentation were consistent across 30- and 90-day readmissions. These included ages: 18-44 years, liver cancer, receipt of liver transplantation, hepatorenal syndrome, prolonged length of stay, and hospitalization in non-teaching facilities. During 30- and 90-day readmissions, care fragmentation was associated with higher risk of mortality (adjusted mean ratio: 1.13[1.03-1.24] and 1.14 [1.06-1.23]; P values<0.0001), prolonged length of stay (4.6-days vs. 4.1-days and 5.2-days vs. 4.6-days; P values<0.0001), and higher hospital charges ($36,884 vs. $28,932 and $37,354 vs. $30,851; P values<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Care fragmentation is high among readmissions for ESLD and is associated with poorer outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94142,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterology","volume":"69 4","pages":"470-478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03232-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: End-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients have frequent readmissions to the same facility or a different hospital (care fragmentation). Care fragmentation results in care delivery from an unfamiliar clinical team or setting, a potential source of suboptimal clinical outcomes. We examined the occurrence, trends, and association between care fragmentation and outcomes during readmissions for ESLD.

Methods: From the Nationwide Readmissions Database (January to September 2010-2014), we followed adult (age ≥18 years) hospitalizations for ESLD who were discharged alive for 90 days. During 30- and 90-day readmissions, we calculated the frequency, determinants, and clinical outcomes of care fragmentation (SAS 9.4).

Results: Of the 67,480 ESLD hospitalizations surviving at discharge from 2010-2014, 35% (23,872) and 52% (35,549) were readmitted in 30- and 90-days respectively. During readmissions, the frequencies of care fragmentation were similar (30-day: 25.4% and 90-day: 25.8%) and remained stable from 2010 to 2014 (P trends>0.5). Similarly, factors associated with care fragmentation were consistent across 30- and 90-day readmissions. These included ages: 18-44 years, liver cancer, receipt of liver transplantation, hepatorenal syndrome, prolonged length of stay, and hospitalization in non-teaching facilities. During 30- and 90-day readmissions, care fragmentation was associated with higher risk of mortality (adjusted mean ratio: 1.13[1.03-1.24] and 1.14 [1.06-1.23]; P values<0.0001), prolonged length of stay (4.6-days vs. 4.1-days and 5.2-days vs. 4.6-days; P values<0.0001), and higher hospital charges ($36,884 vs. $28,932 and $37,354 vs. $30,851; P values<0.0001).

Conclusions: Care fragmentation is high among readmissions for ESLD and is associated with poorer outcomes.

美国终末期肝病患者再入院治疗的全国频率、趋势和医疗保健负担。
背景:终末期肝病(ESLD)患者经常在同一机构或不同医院再次入院(护理分散)。护理分散会导致由不熟悉的临床团队或环境提供护理,这可能会导致不理想的临床结果。我们研究了ESLD再入院期间护理碎片化的发生、趋势以及与预后之间的关联:我们从全国再入院数据库(2010 年 1 月至 2014 年 9 月)中跟踪了因 ESLD 住院且出院 90 天内仍存活的成人(年龄≥18 岁)。在 30 天和 90 天再入院期间,我们计算了护理分散的频率、决定因素和临床结果(SAS 9.4):2010-2014年期间,在出院时存活的67,480名ESLD住院患者中,分别有35%(23,872人)和52%(35,549人)在30天和90天内再次入院。在再入院期间,护理分散的频率相似(30 天:25.4%,90 天:25.8%),并且从 2010 年到 2014 年保持稳定(P 趋势>0.5)。同样,在30天和90天再入院期间,与护理分散相关的因素也是一致的。这些因素包括年龄这些因素包括年龄:18-44 岁、肝癌、接受过肝移植、肝肾综合征、住院时间过长以及在非教学机构住院。在30天和90天的再入院治疗中,护理分散与较高的死亡风险相关(调整后的平均比率:1.13[1.03-1.24]和1.14[1.06-1.23];P值结论:在ESLD再入院患者中,护理分散化程度较高,且与较差的预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信