Karim Ataya, Ayman Bsat, Abdul Hafiz Al Tannir, Al Moutuz Al Jaafareh, Amir Rabih Al, George Abi Saad
{"title":"Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass (SADI) as a Second Step After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Karim Ataya, Ayman Bsat, Abdul Hafiz Al Tannir, Al Moutuz Al Jaafareh, Amir Rabih Al, George Abi Saad","doi":"10.17476/jmbs.2023.12.2.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our aim in this study is to assess single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) as a salvage procedure following sleeve gastrectomy (SG), examining its technical feasibility, outcomes, and potential complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, drawing data from PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane library. The analysis encompassed 14 studies, involving 1,066 patients. We evaluated operative time, comorbidity resolution (hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes), post-operative diarrhea incidence, excess weight loss (EWL) at six, twelve, and twenty-four months, and post-operative leak rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SADI as a salvage procedure following SG yielded positive outcomes. Mean operative time was 125.98 minutes (95% CI 102.50-149.46, I<sup>2</sup>=99%). Importantly, SADI led to comorbidity resolution in a notable proportion of cases: hypertension in 48% (95% CI 38-57%, I<sup>2</sup>=44%), dyslipidemia in 55% (95% CI 40-69%, I<sup>2</sup>=30%), and diabetes in 63% (95% CI 53-72%, I<sup>2</sup>=30%) of patients. Post-operative diarrhea incidence was relatively low at 2% (95% CI 1-9%, I<sup>2</sup>=75%). In terms of weight loss, SADI patients exhibited substantial EWL: 47.73% (95% CI 37.86-57.61, I<sup>2</sup>=95%) at six months, 59.39% (95% CI 51.18-67.61, I<sup>2</sup>=95%) at twelve months, and 23.84% (95% CI 5.76-41.92, I<sup>2</sup>=100%). At twenty-four months. Furthermore, post-operative leak rate was relatively low, reported in only 1% (95% CI 0-5%, I<sup>2</sup>=80%) of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SADI as a salvage procedure post-SG demonstrates technical feasibility and marked effectiveness. It offers substantial comorbidity resolution, significant weight loss, and low post-operative complication rates, notably post-operative leaks. Further research should investigate the long-term impact of SADI on patient nutritional status to facilitate its broader adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":"12 2","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10771976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2023.12.2.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Our aim in this study is to assess single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) as a salvage procedure following sleeve gastrectomy (SG), examining its technical feasibility, outcomes, and potential complications.
Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, drawing data from PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane library. The analysis encompassed 14 studies, involving 1,066 patients. We evaluated operative time, comorbidity resolution (hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes), post-operative diarrhea incidence, excess weight loss (EWL) at six, twelve, and twenty-four months, and post-operative leak rates.
Results: SADI as a salvage procedure following SG yielded positive outcomes. Mean operative time was 125.98 minutes (95% CI 102.50-149.46, I2=99%). Importantly, SADI led to comorbidity resolution in a notable proportion of cases: hypertension in 48% (95% CI 38-57%, I2=44%), dyslipidemia in 55% (95% CI 40-69%, I2=30%), and diabetes in 63% (95% CI 53-72%, I2=30%) of patients. Post-operative diarrhea incidence was relatively low at 2% (95% CI 1-9%, I2=75%). In terms of weight loss, SADI patients exhibited substantial EWL: 47.73% (95% CI 37.86-57.61, I2=95%) at six months, 59.39% (95% CI 51.18-67.61, I2=95%) at twelve months, and 23.84% (95% CI 5.76-41.92, I2=100%). At twenty-four months. Furthermore, post-operative leak rate was relatively low, reported in only 1% (95% CI 0-5%, I2=80%) of cases.
Conclusion: SADI as a salvage procedure post-SG demonstrates technical feasibility and marked effectiveness. It offers substantial comorbidity resolution, significant weight loss, and low post-operative complication rates, notably post-operative leaks. Further research should investigate the long-term impact of SADI on patient nutritional status to facilitate its broader adoption.