Satisfaction with telemedicine use during COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a systematic review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Libyan Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1080/19932820.2024.2301829
W A Alashek, S A Ali
{"title":"Satisfaction with telemedicine use during COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a systematic review.","authors":"W A Alashek, S A Ali","doi":"10.1080/19932820.2024.2301829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Telemedicine became a fundamental part of healthcare provision during COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of telemedicine-associated satisfaction helps the service develop more viable applications. This review evaluated the satisfaction of healthcare users and providers and their willingness to use this modality in future.<b>Methods:</b> The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A search on empirical articles published between March 2020 and December 2022 was performed on 'PubMed' and 'Scopus' databases. Findings that reported on satisfaction of patients, families and caregivers as well as clinicians were extracted and analysed. Quality of included studies was assessed. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the review included 27 eligible studies.<b>Results:</b> Data was found from a variety of emergency and non-emergency departments of primary, secondary, and specialised healthcare. Almost all studies were undertaken within the NHS. There were many tools that measured satisfaction. Satisfaction was high among recipients of healthcare, scoring 9-10 on a scale of 0-10 or ranging from 73.3% to 100%. Convenience was rated high in every specialty examined. Satisfaction of clinicians was high throughout the specialities despite connection failure and concerns about confidentiality of information. Nonetheless, studies reported perception of increased barriers to accessing care and inequalities for vulnerable patients especially in older people. In general, willingness to use telemedicine in future was high in the recipients as well as the providers of healthcare.<b>Conclusion:</b> COVID-19 pandemic has transformed healthcare in the UK and promoted a revolution in telemedicine applications. Satisfaction was high among both recipient and provider of healthcare. Telemedicine managed to provide a continued care throughout the pandemic while maintaining social distance. The current review presented commendable evidence to encourage different specialities to engage in telemedicine application.</p>","PeriodicalId":49910,"journal":{"name":"Libyan Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10783830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libyan Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2024.2301829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine became a fundamental part of healthcare provision during COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of telemedicine-associated satisfaction helps the service develop more viable applications. This review evaluated the satisfaction of healthcare users and providers and their willingness to use this modality in future.Methods: The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A search on empirical articles published between March 2020 and December 2022 was performed on 'PubMed' and 'Scopus' databases. Findings that reported on satisfaction of patients, families and caregivers as well as clinicians were extracted and analysed. Quality of included studies was assessed. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the review included 27 eligible studies.Results: Data was found from a variety of emergency and non-emergency departments of primary, secondary, and specialised healthcare. Almost all studies were undertaken within the NHS. There were many tools that measured satisfaction. Satisfaction was high among recipients of healthcare, scoring 9-10 on a scale of 0-10 or ranging from 73.3% to 100%. Convenience was rated high in every specialty examined. Satisfaction of clinicians was high throughout the specialities despite connection failure and concerns about confidentiality of information. Nonetheless, studies reported perception of increased barriers to accessing care and inequalities for vulnerable patients especially in older people. In general, willingness to use telemedicine in future was high in the recipients as well as the providers of healthcare.Conclusion: COVID-19 pandemic has transformed healthcare in the UK and promoted a revolution in telemedicine applications. Satisfaction was high among both recipient and provider of healthcare. Telemedicine managed to provide a continued care throughout the pandemic while maintaining social distance. The current review presented commendable evidence to encourage different specialities to engage in telemedicine application.

英国 COVID-19 大流行期间对远程医疗使用的满意度:系统回顾。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗已成为医疗保健服务的基本组成部分。对远程医疗相关满意度的评估有助于该服务开发更多可行的应用。本综述评估了医疗用户和医疗服务提供者的满意度以及他们今后使用这种模式的意愿:本研究根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》进行。在 "PubMed "和 "Scopus "数据库中搜索了 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 12 月间发表的经验性文章。提取并分析了报告患者、家属和护理人员以及临床医生满意度的研究结果。对纳入研究的质量进行了评估。在采用纳入和排除标准后,该综述共纳入了 27 项符合条件的研究:研究数据来自初级、二级和专业医疗保健机构的各种急诊和非急诊部门。几乎所有的研究都是在国家医疗服务体系内进行的。测量满意度的工具很多。医疗服务接受者的满意度很高,在 0-10 分的评分中,满意度为 9-10 分,满意度从 73.3% 到 100% 不等。在检查的每个专科中,便利性都得到了很高的评价。尽管存在连接故障和信息保密问题,但临床医生对所有专科的满意度都很高。不过,也有研究报告称,弱势病人,尤其是老年人,在获得医疗服务方面遇到的障碍和不平等现象有所增加。总体而言,医疗服务的接受者和提供者都非常愿意在未来使用远程医疗:结论:COVID-19 大流行改变了英国的医疗保健,推动了远程医疗应用的革命。医疗服务接受者和提供者的满意度都很高。在整个大流行期间,远程医疗在保持社会距离的同时成功地提供了持续的医疗服务。本次审查提供了值得称赞的证据,鼓励不同专业参与远程医疗应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Libyan Journal of Medicine
Libyan Journal of Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Libyan Journal of Medicine (LJM) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access, international medical journal aiming to promote heath and health education by publishing high-quality medical research in the different disciplines of medicine. LJM was founded in 2006 by a group of enthusiastic Libyan medical scientists who looked at the contribution of Libyan publications to the international medical literature and saw that a publication outlet was missing. To fill this gap they launched LJM as a tool for transferring current medical knowledge to and from colleagues in developing countries, particularly African countries, as well as internationally.The journal is still led by a group of Libyan physicians inside and outside Libya, but it also enjoys support and recognition from the international medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信