Grazing preferences of three species of amoebae on cyanobacteria and green algae

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Harold G. Weger, April K. Polasek, Derek M. Wright, Arun Damodaran, John Stavrinides
{"title":"Grazing preferences of three species of amoebae on cyanobacteria and green algae","authors":"Harold G. Weger,&nbsp;April K. Polasek,&nbsp;Derek M. Wright,&nbsp;Arun Damodaran,&nbsp;John Stavrinides","doi":"10.1111/jeu.13018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Twenty species/isolates of cyanobacteria and green algae were isolated from cyanobacterial bloom samples in lakes associated with the upper Qu'Appelle River drainage system in southern Saskatchewan, Canada. Three amoebae species (<i>Cochliopodium</i> sp., <i>Vannella</i> sp. and <i>Vermamoeba vermiformis</i>) were also isolated from one of these samples, and were subjected to grazing assays to determine which species of cyanobacteria or algae could potentially serve as a food source. Amoeba grazing rates were quantified based on the diameter of the plaque after 12 days on agar plate assays, and by estimation of the amoeba population growth rate from the rate of increase of plaque area. The common cyanobacterial bloom-formers <i>Dolichospermum</i> sp. and <i>Aphanizomenon flos-aquae</i> supported high growth rates for all three amoebae, while green algae, with the exception of one green alga/amoeba combination, did not support growth of the tested amoebae. Many of the cyanobacterial and algal isolates that did not support amoebae growth were ingested, suggesting that ingestion did not determine grazing success. Overall, while the cyanobacteria <i>Dolichospermum</i> sp. and <i>Aphanizomenon flos-aquae</i> were suitable food sources for the amoebae, the other cyanobacteria were grazed in an unpredictable manner, with some species/strains grazed by some amoebae and some species not grazed at all.</p>","PeriodicalId":15672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology","volume":"71 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jeu.13018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jeu.13018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty species/isolates of cyanobacteria and green algae were isolated from cyanobacterial bloom samples in lakes associated with the upper Qu'Appelle River drainage system in southern Saskatchewan, Canada. Three amoebae species (Cochliopodium sp., Vannella sp. and Vermamoeba vermiformis) were also isolated from one of these samples, and were subjected to grazing assays to determine which species of cyanobacteria or algae could potentially serve as a food source. Amoeba grazing rates were quantified based on the diameter of the plaque after 12 days on agar plate assays, and by estimation of the amoeba population growth rate from the rate of increase of plaque area. The common cyanobacterial bloom-formers Dolichospermum sp. and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae supported high growth rates for all three amoebae, while green algae, with the exception of one green alga/amoeba combination, did not support growth of the tested amoebae. Many of the cyanobacterial and algal isolates that did not support amoebae growth were ingested, suggesting that ingestion did not determine grazing success. Overall, while the cyanobacteria Dolichospermum sp. and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae were suitable food sources for the amoebae, the other cyanobacteria were grazed in an unpredictable manner, with some species/strains grazed by some amoebae and some species not grazed at all.

Abstract Image

三种变形虫对蓝藻和绿藻的偏好。
从加拿大萨斯喀彻温省南部 Qu'Appelle 河上游排水系统相关湖泊的蓝藻藻华样本中分离出了 20 种蓝藻和绿藻。此外,还从其中一个样本中分离出三种阿米巴(Cochliopodium sp.、Vannella sp.和 Vermamoeba vermiformis),并对其进行了捕食试验,以确定哪些蓝藻或藻类可能成为食物来源。根据琼脂平板试验 12 天后的斑块直径,以及根据斑块面积的增加率估算的变形虫种群增长率,对变形虫的食草率进行了量化。常见的蓝藻藻华形成菌 Dolichospermum sp.和 Aphanizomenon flos-aquae 支持所有三种变形虫的高生长率,而绿藻(一种绿藻/变形虫组合除外)则不支持受测变形虫的生长。许多不支持变形虫生长的蓝藻和藻类分离物都被食入,这表明食入并不决定食草的成功与否。总体而言,虽然蓝藻 Dolichospermum sp.和 Aphanizomenon flos-aquae 适合阿米巴原虫作为食物来源,但其他蓝藻的摄食情况难以预测,有些种类/株系被某些阿米巴原虫摄食,而有些种类则完全不被摄食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology publishes original research on protists, including lower algae and fungi. Articles are published covering all aspects of these organisms, including their behavior, biochemistry, cell biology, chemotherapy, development, ecology, evolution, genetics, molecular biology, morphogenetics, parasitology, systematics, and ultrastructure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信