Julian A Anhaus, Maximilian Heider, Philipp Killermann, Christian Hofmann, Andreas H Mahnken
{"title":"A New Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm for Both Energy-Integrating and Photon-Counting CT Systems.","authors":"Julian A Anhaus, Maximilian Heider, Philipp Killermann, Christian Hofmann, Andreas H Mahnken","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to introduce and evaluate a new metal artifact reduction framework (iMARv2) that addresses the drawbacks (residual artifacts after correction and user preferences for image quality) associated with the current clinically applied iMAR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A new iMARv2 has been introduced, combining the current iMAR with new modular components to remove residual metal artifacts after image correction. The postcorrection image impression is adjustable with user-selectable strength settings. Phantom scans from an energy-integrating and a photon-counting detector CT were used to assess image quality, including a Gammex phantom and anthropomorphic phantoms. In addition, 36 clinical cases (with metallic implants such as dental fillings, hip replacements, and spinal screws) were reconstructed and evaluated in a blinded and randomized reader study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Gammex phantom showed lower HU errors compared with the uncorrected image at almost all iMAR and iMARv2 settings evaluated, with only minor differences between iMAR and the different iMARv2 settings. In addition, the anthropomorphic phantoms showed a trend toward lower errors with higher iMARv2 strength settings. On average, the iMARv2 strength 3 performed best of all the clinical reconstructions evaluated, with a significant increase in diagnostic confidence and decrease in artifacts. All hip and dental cases showed a significant increase in diagnostic confidence and decrease in artifact strength, and the improvements from iMARv2 in the dental cases were significant compared with iMAR. There were no significant improvements in the spine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work has introduced and evaluated a new method for metal artifact reduction and demonstrated its utility in routine clinical datasets. The greatest improvements were seen in dental fillings, where iMARv2 significantly improved image quality compared with conventional iMAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to introduce and evaluate a new metal artifact reduction framework (iMARv2) that addresses the drawbacks (residual artifacts after correction and user preferences for image quality) associated with the current clinically applied iMAR.
Materials and methods: A new iMARv2 has been introduced, combining the current iMAR with new modular components to remove residual metal artifacts after image correction. The postcorrection image impression is adjustable with user-selectable strength settings. Phantom scans from an energy-integrating and a photon-counting detector CT were used to assess image quality, including a Gammex phantom and anthropomorphic phantoms. In addition, 36 clinical cases (with metallic implants such as dental fillings, hip replacements, and spinal screws) were reconstructed and evaluated in a blinded and randomized reader study.
Results: The Gammex phantom showed lower HU errors compared with the uncorrected image at almost all iMAR and iMARv2 settings evaluated, with only minor differences between iMAR and the different iMARv2 settings. In addition, the anthropomorphic phantoms showed a trend toward lower errors with higher iMARv2 strength settings. On average, the iMARv2 strength 3 performed best of all the clinical reconstructions evaluated, with a significant increase in diagnostic confidence and decrease in artifacts. All hip and dental cases showed a significant increase in diagnostic confidence and decrease in artifact strength, and the improvements from iMARv2 in the dental cases were significant compared with iMAR. There were no significant improvements in the spine.
Conclusions: This work has introduced and evaluated a new method for metal artifact reduction and demonstrated its utility in routine clinical datasets. The greatest improvements were seen in dental fillings, where iMARv2 significantly improved image quality compared with conventional iMAR.
期刊介绍：
Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
