Integrating chemical similarity and bioequivalence: an overall evaluation of the quality consistency of traditional decoction and dispensing granule decoction of Amomum villosum.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1080/03639045.2024.2303381
Yousong Yue, Haiyang Li, Manwen Xu, Lijie Ma, Xiaopeng Wang, Yan Miao, Lu Zhang, Xuelin Li, Ruixin Liu
{"title":"Integrating chemical similarity and bioequivalence: an overall evaluation of the quality consistency of traditional decoction and dispensing granule decoction of <i>Amomum villosum</i>.","authors":"Yousong Yue, Haiyang Li, Manwen Xu, Lijie Ma, Xiaopeng Wang, Yan Miao, Lu Zhang, Xuelin Li, Ruixin Liu","doi":"10.1080/03639045.2024.2303381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the quality consistency between traditional decoction (TD) of <i>Amomum villosum</i> and its dispensing granule decoction (DGD). Fifteen batches of TD and nine batches of dispensing granules (manufactured by A, B, and C) were prepared and evaluated for their consistency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Firstly, The chemical similarity of TD and DGD was examined using GC and HPLC, coupled with hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), criteria importance though intercrieria correlation(CRITIC) weighting method, and principal component analysis (PCA). Secondly, the gastrointestinal motility experiments in mice, along with the CRITIC weighting method, were employed to assess the bioequivalence of TD and DGD of <i>Amomum villosum</i>. Finally, the entropy weight technique-gray relative analysis(GRA) method was used to compare the quality of <i>Amomum villosum</i> decoctions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>①The CRITIC weighting method indicated significantly higher scores for TD than DGD (<i>p</i> < 0.01). HCA and PCA results demonstrated a clear distinction between TD and DGD. ②Gastrointestinal motility test results revealed no significant difference between TD and DGD in other indicators (<i>p</i> > 0.05).③Gray relative analysis results showed that the relative correlation of TD was more significant than that of DGD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The chemical composition of DGD and TD differed. The biological activity of DGD-A/B was consistent with that of TD, while the difference between DGD-C and TD was significant. A comprehensive evaluation showed that TD exhibited better quality than DGD. DGD manufacturers should optimize the preparation process to enhance product quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2024.2303381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the quality consistency between traditional decoction (TD) of Amomum villosum and its dispensing granule decoction (DGD). Fifteen batches of TD and nine batches of dispensing granules (manufactured by A, B, and C) were prepared and evaluated for their consistency.

Methods: Firstly, The chemical similarity of TD and DGD was examined using GC and HPLC, coupled with hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), criteria importance though intercrieria correlation(CRITIC) weighting method, and principal component analysis (PCA). Secondly, the gastrointestinal motility experiments in mice, along with the CRITIC weighting method, were employed to assess the bioequivalence of TD and DGD of Amomum villosum. Finally, the entropy weight technique-gray relative analysis(GRA) method was used to compare the quality of Amomum villosum decoctions.

Results: ①The CRITIC weighting method indicated significantly higher scores for TD than DGD (p < 0.01). HCA and PCA results demonstrated a clear distinction between TD and DGD. ②Gastrointestinal motility test results revealed no significant difference between TD and DGD in other indicators (p > 0.05).③Gray relative analysis results showed that the relative correlation of TD was more significant than that of DGD.

Conclusion: The chemical composition of DGD and TD differed. The biological activity of DGD-A/B was consistent with that of TD, while the difference between DGD-C and TD was significant. A comprehensive evaluation showed that TD exhibited better quality than DGD. DGD manufacturers should optimize the preparation process to enhance product quality.

整合化学相似性和生物等效性:对传统煎剂和点滴颗粒煎剂的质量一致性进行整体评价。
研究目的本研究旨在调查传统煎煮法(TD)和冲剂颗粒煎煮法(DGD)之间的质量一致性。研究人员制备了 15 个批次的传统水煎剂(TD)和 9 个批次的冲剂颗粒(由 A、B 和 C 生产),并对其一致性进行了评估。方法首先,采用气相色谱(GC)和高效液相色谱(HPLC),结合层次聚类分析(HCA)、CRITIC(Criteria importance though intercrieria correlation)加权法和主成分分析(PCA),考察了 TD 和 DGD 的化学相似性。其次,采用小鼠胃肠道蠕动实验和 CRITIC 加权法来评估阿莫西林 TD 和 DGD 的生物等效性。最后,采用熵权技术-灰色相对分析法(GRA)比较了毛果芸香煎剂的质量:结果:①CRITIC加权法显示,TD的得分明显高于DGD(P P > 0.05);③灰色相对分析结果显示,TD的相对相关性比DGD更显著。结论DGD 和 TD 的化学成分不同。DGD-A/B 的生物活性与 TD 一致,而 DGD-C 与 TD 的生物活性差异显著。综合评价显示,TD 的质量优于 DGD。DGD 生产商应优化制备过程,以提高产品质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
上海源叶 bornyl acetate
¥30.00~¥105150.00
上海源叶 vanillic acid
¥9.00~¥29157.76
上海源叶 protocatechuic acid
¥18.00~¥9196.00
上海源叶 quercetin
¥25.00~¥8412.00
上海源叶 camphor
¥20.00~¥6653.00
上海源叶 catechin
¥119.00~¥278.00
上海源叶 Dextran blue-2000
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信