Blended learning in the engineering field: A systematic literature review

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Roberto Sala, Antonio Maffei, Fabiana Pirola, Fredrik Enoksson, Sandi Ljubić, Arian Skoki, Joseph P. Zammit, Amberlynn Bonello, Primož Podržaj, Tena Žužek, Paolo C. Priarone, Dario Antonelli, Giuditta Pezzotta
{"title":"Blended learning in the engineering field: A systematic literature review","authors":"Roberto Sala,&nbsp;Antonio Maffei,&nbsp;Fabiana Pirola,&nbsp;Fredrik Enoksson,&nbsp;Sandi Ljubić,&nbsp;Arian Skoki,&nbsp;Joseph P. Zammit,&nbsp;Amberlynn Bonello,&nbsp;Primož Podržaj,&nbsp;Tena Žužek,&nbsp;Paolo C. Priarone,&nbsp;Dario Antonelli,&nbsp;Giuditta Pezzotta","doi":"10.1002/cae.22712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Blended Learning (BL) is defined as a combination of face-to-face and digital activities that, in recent years, has been adopted more and more frequently by Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs). In the engineering field, the adoption of BL allows creating challenging situations for students with industry-like problems to foster the acquisition of advanced problem-solving skills. Thus, it can be used to enhance traditional learning by enriching it with new aspects, allowing to update the Intended Learning Outcomes traditionally defined by teachers. Although prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) teachers had the time to prepare and programme the transition to BL, during the pandemic they had to abruptly move to the full digital delivery of the content, requiring technological and organizational adaptation, as well as change in the content teaching and assessment methods. Through a systematic literature review, this paper aims to understand how BL has been implemented in the engineering field by HEIs, discussing if and how the learning expectations of teachers (evaluated through Bloom's Taxonomy) change when using different mixes of face-to-face and digital activities and when the target audience changes. More specifically, the investigation addresses how content and learning expectations are split and set in face-to-face and digital settings. Additionally, the interest is towards understanding how COVID-19 impacted the adoption of BL, not only during the pandemic but also after.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cae.22712","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blended Learning (BL) is defined as a combination of face-to-face and digital activities that, in recent years, has been adopted more and more frequently by Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs). In the engineering field, the adoption of BL allows creating challenging situations for students with industry-like problems to foster the acquisition of advanced problem-solving skills. Thus, it can be used to enhance traditional learning by enriching it with new aspects, allowing to update the Intended Learning Outcomes traditionally defined by teachers. Although prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) teachers had the time to prepare and programme the transition to BL, during the pandemic they had to abruptly move to the full digital delivery of the content, requiring technological and organizational adaptation, as well as change in the content teaching and assessment methods. Through a systematic literature review, this paper aims to understand how BL has been implemented in the engineering field by HEIs, discussing if and how the learning expectations of teachers (evaluated through Bloom's Taxonomy) change when using different mixes of face-to-face and digital activities and when the target audience changes. More specifically, the investigation addresses how content and learning expectations are split and set in face-to-face and digital settings. Additionally, the interest is towards understanding how COVID-19 impacted the adoption of BL, not only during the pandemic but also after.

Abstract Image

工程领域的混合式学习:系统文献综述
混合式学习(Blended Learning,BL)被定义为面授与数字活动的结合,近年来越来越多地被高等教育机构(HEIs)所采用。在工程学领域,采用 "BL "可以为学生创造具有挑战性的情境,解决类似行业的问题,从而培养学生掌握先进的解决问题的技能。因此,它可以用来加强传统的学习,用新的内容来丰富传统的学习,从而更新传统上由教师定义的预期学习成果。虽然在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)之前,教师有时间准备和规划向基础教育的过渡,但在大流行期间,他们不得不突然转向完全数字化的内容交付,这需要技术和组织上的适应,以及内容教学和评估方法的改变。通过系统的文献回顾,本文旨在了解高等院校如何在工程学领域实施基础教育,讨论当使用不同的面授和数字活动组合以及目标受众发生变化时,教师的学习期望(通过布卢姆分类学进行评估)是否以及如何发生变化。更具体地说,调查涉及在面对面和数字化环境中如何分割和设定教学内容和学习期望。此外,调查的兴趣还在于了解 COVID-19 如何影响基本法的采用,不仅是在大流行期间,而且在大流行之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信