Volatility spillover and hedging strategies among Chinese carbon, energy, and electricity markets

IF 5.4 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yong Wang , Shimiao Liu , Mohammad Zoynul Abedin , Brian Lucey
{"title":"Volatility spillover and hedging strategies among Chinese carbon, energy, and electricity markets","authors":"Yong Wang ,&nbsp;Shimiao Liu ,&nbsp;Mohammad Zoynul Abedin ,&nbsp;Brian Lucey","doi":"10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is an intricate relationship between the carbon, energy, and electricity markets, and it is essential to clarify the relationship between them to promote the sustainable development of the three markets. This paper focuses on Chinese carbon, energy, and electricity markets and uses the TVP-VAR model to explore the risk spillover effects among these markets. It also combines the QVAR model with the TVP-VAR model to assess the impact of COVID-19 on their connectedness. Additionally, an effective diversified portfolio is constructed to cope with inter-market risk spillover. The empirical testing is conducted using a sample of eight bellwether stocks from Chinese carbon, energy, and electricity markets, spanning from August 1, 2013, to December 30, 2022. Results show that: 1. Risk spillover among the three markets is particularly evident in the downside or upside market. 2. The carbon market and electricity market are the largest recipients and transmitters of net risk spillovers, respectively. 3. During COVID-19, the carbon market enhanced the spillovers on other markets under market downside periods. Our findings provide theoretical references for market participants and regulators to address inter-market volatility spillovers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124000040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an intricate relationship between the carbon, energy, and electricity markets, and it is essential to clarify the relationship between them to promote the sustainable development of the three markets. This paper focuses on Chinese carbon, energy, and electricity markets and uses the TVP-VAR model to explore the risk spillover effects among these markets. It also combines the QVAR model with the TVP-VAR model to assess the impact of COVID-19 on their connectedness. Additionally, an effective diversified portfolio is constructed to cope with inter-market risk spillover. The empirical testing is conducted using a sample of eight bellwether stocks from Chinese carbon, energy, and electricity markets, spanning from August 1, 2013, to December 30, 2022. Results show that: 1. Risk spillover among the three markets is particularly evident in the downside or upside market. 2. The carbon market and electricity market are the largest recipients and transmitters of net risk spillovers, respectively. 3. During COVID-19, the carbon market enhanced the spillovers on other markets under market downside periods. Our findings provide theoretical references for market participants and regulators to address inter-market volatility spillovers.

中国碳市场、能源市场和电力市场的波动溢出和对冲策略
碳市场、能源市场和电力市场之间的关系错综复杂,厘清三者之间的关系对于促进三大市场的可持续发展至关重要。本文以中国的碳市场、能源市场和电力市场为研究对象,运用 TVP-VAR 模型探讨这些市场之间的风险溢出效应。本文还将 QVAR 模型与 TVP-VAR 模型相结合,评估 COVID-19 对其关联性的影响。此外,还构建了有效的多元化投资组合,以应对市场间的风险溢出。实证检验以中国碳市场、能源市场和电力市场的八只风向标股票为样本,时间跨度为 2013 年 8 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 30 日。结果表明1.三个市场之间的风险溢出在下行或上行市场中尤为明显。2.2. 碳市场和电力市场分别是净风险溢出的最大接受者和传递者。3.在 COVID-19 期间,碳市场在市场下行时期增强了对其他市场的溢出效应。我们的研究结果为市场参与者和监管者应对市场间波动溢出效应提供了理论参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: International trade, financing and investments, and the related cash and credit transactions, have grown at an extremely rapid pace in recent years. The international monetary system has continued to evolve to accommodate the need for foreign-currency denominated transactions and in the process has provided opportunities for its ongoing observation and study. The purpose of the Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money is to publish rigorous, original articles dealing with the international aspects of financial markets, institutions and money. Theoretical/conceptual and empirical papers providing meaningful insights into the subject areas will be considered. The following topic areas, although not exhaustive, are representative of the coverage in this Journal. • International financial markets • International securities markets • Foreign exchange markets • Eurocurrency markets • International syndications • Term structures of Eurocurrency rates • Determination of exchange rates • Information, speculation and parity • Forward rates and swaps • International payment mechanisms • International commercial banking; • International investment banking • Central bank intervention • International monetary systems • Balance of payments.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信