Beyond GAAP: A Case Study Analyzing Non-GAAP Financial Measures and SEC Comment Letters through the Lens of the FASB Conceptual Framework

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Kevin Hale, Rebecca J Wetmiller
{"title":"Beyond GAAP: A Case Study Analyzing Non-GAAP Financial Measures and SEC Comment Letters through the Lens of the FASB Conceptual Framework","authors":"Kevin Hale, Rebecca J Wetmiller","doi":"10.2308/issues-2023-039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Non-GAAP financial measures are disclosed by companies to provide information to investors and other stakeholders beyond what is required by traditional GAAP-based financial statements. Although these voluntary non-GAAP measures may provide useful information for decision-making, their limited regulation and standardization may mislead investors. This case exposes students to several aspects of non-GAAP measures. First, students will be able to locate, compare, and analyze differences in GAAP and non-GAAP measures in various disclosure mediums and subsequently describe the benefits and disadvantages in different contexts. Next, using EDGAR, students will be able to locate and discuss specific issues regulators have taken with these disclosures by analyzing SEC comment letters. Finally, students will be able to compare the usefulness of GAAP and non-GAAP measures using the FASB conceptual framework. Overall, this case provides students with an increased understanding of how companies use differential financial disclosures in the broader financial reporting environment.","PeriodicalId":46324,"journal":{"name":"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2023-039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-GAAP financial measures are disclosed by companies to provide information to investors and other stakeholders beyond what is required by traditional GAAP-based financial statements. Although these voluntary non-GAAP measures may provide useful information for decision-making, their limited regulation and standardization may mislead investors. This case exposes students to several aspects of non-GAAP measures. First, students will be able to locate, compare, and analyze differences in GAAP and non-GAAP measures in various disclosure mediums and subsequently describe the benefits and disadvantages in different contexts. Next, using EDGAR, students will be able to locate and discuss specific issues regulators have taken with these disclosures by analyzing SEC comment letters. Finally, students will be able to compare the usefulness of GAAP and non-GAAP measures using the FASB conceptual framework. Overall, this case provides students with an increased understanding of how companies use differential financial disclosures in the broader financial reporting environment.
超越公认会计准则:通过财务会计准则委员会概念框架分析非公认会计原则财务指标和美国证券交易委员会意见书的案例研究
公司披露非美国通用会计准则财务指标,是为了向投资者和其他利益相关者提供超出基于美国通用会计准则的传统财务报表要求的信息。尽管这些自愿性的非美国通用会计准则衡量标准可以为决策提供有用的信息,但其有限的监管和标准化可能会误导投资者。本案例让学生了解非公认会计原则计量的几个方面。首先,学生将能够在各种披露媒介中查找、比较和分析公认会计原则和非公认会计原则的差异,并随后描述在不同情况下的利弊。接下来,学生将能够使用 EDGAR,通过分析美国证券交易委员会的评论信,找到并讨论监管机构对这些披露所采取的具体问题。最后,学生将能够使用美国财务会计准则委员会的概念框架,比较公认会计原则和非公认会计原则的有用性。总之,通过本案例,学生可以进一步了解公司如何在更广泛的财务报告环境中使用差异化财务披露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The mission of Issues in Accounting Education is to publish research, commentaries, instructional resources, and book reviews that assist accounting faculty in teaching and that address important issues in accounting education. The journal will consist of two major sections, “Research and Commentary” and “Instructional Resources”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信