The Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 and Lipocalin 2 Expressions in Primary Breast Cancer and Their Associations with Molecular Subtypes and Prognostic Factors

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Suheyla Ekemen, Ebru Bilir, Hagar Elsayed Akram Soultan, Sadia Zafar, Figen Demir, Babek Tabandeh, Sadik Toprak, Ozlem Yapicier, Cevayir Coban
{"title":"The Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 and Lipocalin 2 Expressions in Primary Breast Cancer and Their Associations with Molecular Subtypes and Prognostic Factors","authors":"Suheyla Ekemen, Ebru Bilir, Hagar Elsayed Akram Soultan, Sadia Zafar, Figen Demir, Babek Tabandeh, Sadik Toprak, Ozlem Yapicier, Cevayir Coban","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S444077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Breast cancers exhibit molecular heterogeneity, leading to diverse clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-L1 have shown promise in various malignancies, including breast cancer. Lipocalin 2 (LCN2) has also been associated with tumor aggressiveness and prognostic potential in breast cancers. However, the expression of PD-L1 and LCN2 in breast cancer subtypes and their prognostic implications remains poorly investigated. Methods A retrospective analysis of 89 primary breast cancer cases was conducted to assess PD-L1 and LCN2 expressions using immunohistochemistry. Cases were classified into four different molecular subtypes based on ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 status. Associations between PD-L1 and LCN2 expressions and various prognostic factors were examined. Results Although low expression of LCN2 (Allred score of <3) was observed even in normal breast tissue, LCN2 expression with increasing Allred score (≥3) positively correlated with the histological grade, high Ki-67 proliferation index, and ER/PR negativity. Significant elevations of LCN2 and PD-L1 expressions were observed in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers. Conclusion The results of the study highlight the association of LCN2 with known prognostic factors and molecular subtypes. To identify potential immunotherapy recipients, it would be useful to evaluate LCN2 as well as PD-L1 immune targets in different subgroups of breast cancer patients. Further studies with larger patient numbers are warranted to validate these observations and establish standardized scoring criteria for LCN2 expression assessment.","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S444077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Breast cancers exhibit molecular heterogeneity, leading to diverse clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-L1 have shown promise in various malignancies, including breast cancer. Lipocalin 2 (LCN2) has also been associated with tumor aggressiveness and prognostic potential in breast cancers. However, the expression of PD-L1 and LCN2 in breast cancer subtypes and their prognostic implications remains poorly investigated. Methods A retrospective analysis of 89 primary breast cancer cases was conducted to assess PD-L1 and LCN2 expressions using immunohistochemistry. Cases were classified into four different molecular subtypes based on ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 status. Associations between PD-L1 and LCN2 expressions and various prognostic factors were examined. Results Although low expression of LCN2 (Allred score of <3) was observed even in normal breast tissue, LCN2 expression with increasing Allred score (≥3) positively correlated with the histological grade, high Ki-67 proliferation index, and ER/PR negativity. Significant elevations of LCN2 and PD-L1 expressions were observed in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers. Conclusion The results of the study highlight the association of LCN2 with known prognostic factors and molecular subtypes. To identify potential immunotherapy recipients, it would be useful to evaluate LCN2 as well as PD-L1 immune targets in different subgroups of breast cancer patients. Further studies with larger patient numbers are warranted to validate these observations and establish standardized scoring criteria for LCN2 expression assessment.
原发性乳腺癌中程序性细胞死亡配体 1 和脂联素 2 的表达及其与分子亚型和预后因素的关系
目的 乳腺癌具有分子异质性,导致不同的临床结果和治疗反应。以 PD-L1 为靶点的免疫检查点抑制剂已在包括乳腺癌在内的多种恶性肿瘤中显示出前景。脂联素 2(LCN2)也与乳腺癌的肿瘤侵袭性和预后潜力有关。然而,PD-L1 和 LCN2 在乳腺癌亚型中的表达及其对预后的影响仍未得到充分研究。方法 对 89 例原发性乳腺癌病例进行回顾性分析,采用免疫组化方法评估 PD-L1 和 LCN2 的表达。根据ER、PR、HER2和Ki-67状态将病例分为四种不同的分子亚型。研究了 PD-L1 和 LCN2 表达与各种预后因素之间的关系。结果 尽管在正常乳腺组织中也能观察到 LCN2 的低表达(Allred 评分 <3),但 LCN2 的表达随着 Allred 评分的增加(≥3)与组织学分级、高 Ki-67 增殖指数和 ER/PR 阴性呈正相关。在三阴性和 HER2 阳性乳腺癌中观察到 LCN2 和 PD-L1 表达的显著升高。结论 该研究结果强调了 LCN2 与已知预后因素和分子亚型的关联。为了确定潜在的免疫疗法受体,对不同亚组乳腺癌患者的 LCN2 和 PD-L1 免疫靶点进行评估将非常有用。为了验证这些观察结果,并建立 LCN2 表达评估的标准化评分标准,有必要对更多患者进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信