CHARACTERIZATION AND COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PYROLYSIS OF LOW RANK COAL AND BIOMASS

Q3 Engineering
R. Jelita, I. F. Nata, C. Irawan, J. Jefriadi, Muhammad Hafiz, Indrayati Angreini, Meilana Dharma Putra
{"title":"CHARACTERIZATION AND COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PYROLYSIS OF LOW RANK COAL AND BIOMASS","authors":"R. Jelita, I. F. Nata, C. Irawan, J. Jefriadi, Muhammad Hafiz, Indrayati Angreini, Meilana Dharma Putra","doi":"10.59957/jctm.v59.i1.2024.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low rank coals are not used optimally, another way to increase this value is combustion without oxygen, known as pyrolysis. On the other hand, as a solid waste biomass, palm kernel shell (PKS) is a by-product of the palm oil industry that can cause environmental problems if not handled properly. In fact, the waste is plentiful and not even widely used, therefore it may also be an ideal feedstock for the pyrolysis process. This study compares the distribution of products from coal and PKS pyrolysis, and also characterizes the liquid (tar) and solid (char) products. The results show that the pyrolysis of coal produces more char, while the pyrolysis of PKS produces more gas. Higher tar yields were obtained with the pyrolysis process using PKS. GC-MS identified the main tar compounds for both materials as phenol and acetic acid, 3-methylphenol and methanol were also found in coal and PKS, respectively. The calorific value of char increased by about 5.19 % for coal and 41.12 % for PKS after pyrolysis. The other physical properties of coal and PKS are also improved after pyrolysis. Therefore, the application of pyrolysis in the use of coal and PKS can increase the added value of these two materials and contribute to alternative energy sources. ","PeriodicalId":38363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy","volume":"107 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59957/jctm.v59.i1.2024.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low rank coals are not used optimally, another way to increase this value is combustion without oxygen, known as pyrolysis. On the other hand, as a solid waste biomass, palm kernel shell (PKS) is a by-product of the palm oil industry that can cause environmental problems if not handled properly. In fact, the waste is plentiful and not even widely used, therefore it may also be an ideal feedstock for the pyrolysis process. This study compares the distribution of products from coal and PKS pyrolysis, and also characterizes the liquid (tar) and solid (char) products. The results show that the pyrolysis of coal produces more char, while the pyrolysis of PKS produces more gas. Higher tar yields were obtained with the pyrolysis process using PKS. GC-MS identified the main tar compounds for both materials as phenol and acetic acid, 3-methylphenol and methanol were also found in coal and PKS, respectively. The calorific value of char increased by about 5.19 % for coal and 41.12 % for PKS after pyrolysis. The other physical properties of coal and PKS are also improved after pyrolysis. Therefore, the application of pyrolysis in the use of coal and PKS can increase the added value of these two materials and contribute to alternative energy sources. 
低阶煤和生物质热解的特征和比较研究
低等级煤炭没有得到最佳利用,提高这一价值的另一种方法是无氧燃烧,即所谓的热解。另一方面,棕榈核壳(PKS)作为一种固体废物生物质,是棕榈油工业的副产品,如果处理不当,会造成环境问题。事实上,这种废弃物数量很多,甚至没有得到广泛利用,因此也可能是热解工艺的理想原料。本研究比较了煤和 PKS 高温分解产物的分布情况,并分析了液体(焦油)和固体(焦炭)产物的特征。结果表明,煤的热解产生更多的炭,而 PKS 的热解产生更多的气体。在使用 PKS 的热解过程中,焦油产量更高。气相色谱-质谱鉴定出两种材料的主要焦油化合物都是苯酚和乙酸,在煤和 PKS 中还分别发现了 3-甲基苯酚和甲醇。热解后,煤炭的热值提高了约 5.19%,而 PKS 的热值提高了 41.12%。煤和聚苯乙烯的其他物理性质在热解后也得到了改善。因此,在煤炭和聚苯乙烯的使用中应用热解技术可以提高这两种材料的附加值,为替代能源做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy
Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信