Evaluating Child Behavior and Preference Toward NumBee and Traditional Syringe (a Randomized Clinical Trial)

Q4 Dentistry
Duaa Kamal, Z. J. Jafar
{"title":"Evaluating Child Behavior and Preference Toward NumBee and Traditional Syringe (a Randomized Clinical Trial)","authors":"Duaa Kamal, Z. J. Jafar","doi":"10.5195/d3000.2024.589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nBACKGROUND: Local anesthetics are the gold standard for pain control in dentistry. Most patients still view the “needle” as a source of anxiety and disruptive behavior rather than relief. The patient’s cooperation and comfort level will increase with the administration of painless local anesthetic injection using appropriate technique. The purpose of this study was to assess the patient cooperation and behavior after receiving local anesthesia injection and to compare patients’ acceptance and preference of needleless NumBee anesthetic delivery device to conventional dental syringe.\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 non-fearful 6-8-year-olds who had never been to the dentist were selected for the study using a split-mouth design. They underwent a simple class I restoration on both mandibular permanent first molar teeth in two separated dental visits. The Frankl behavior rating scale was used to assess patient behavior following injection. Patients expressed their preference and acceptance of the used syringes by answering a questionnaire.\nRESULTS: After injection by either method, 25 patients had Frankl behavior rating score of 4. Patients that had a negative response with the traditional method, showed a score of 2, following NumBee injection (p=0.035).\nCONCLUSION: Patients accepted both methods, and NumBee may induce less fear, with minimum stinging and unpleasant taste.\n\n","PeriodicalId":37056,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry 3000","volume":"37 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry 3000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2024.589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetics are the gold standard for pain control in dentistry. Most patients still view the “needle” as a source of anxiety and disruptive behavior rather than relief. The patient’s cooperation and comfort level will increase with the administration of painless local anesthetic injection using appropriate technique. The purpose of this study was to assess the patient cooperation and behavior after receiving local anesthesia injection and to compare patients’ acceptance and preference of needleless NumBee anesthetic delivery device to conventional dental syringe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 non-fearful 6-8-year-olds who had never been to the dentist were selected for the study using a split-mouth design. They underwent a simple class I restoration on both mandibular permanent first molar teeth in two separated dental visits. The Frankl behavior rating scale was used to assess patient behavior following injection. Patients expressed their preference and acceptance of the used syringes by answering a questionnaire. RESULTS: After injection by either method, 25 patients had Frankl behavior rating score of 4. Patients that had a negative response with the traditional method, showed a score of 2, following NumBee injection (p=0.035). CONCLUSION: Patients accepted both methods, and NumBee may induce less fear, with minimum stinging and unpleasant taste.
评估儿童对 NumBee 和传统注射器的行为和偏好(随机临床试验)
背景:局部麻醉剂是牙科疼痛控制的黄金标准。大多数患者仍然认为 "打针 "是焦虑和干扰行为的来源,而不是缓解疼痛的方法。使用适当的技术进行无痛局麻药注射后,患者的配合度和舒适度都会提高。本研究的目的是评估患者在接受局部麻醉注射后的配合度和行为,并比较患者对无针 NumBee 麻醉给药装置和传统牙科注射器的接受程度和偏好。他们分两次就诊,对两颗下颌第一恒磨牙进行了简单的 I 级修复。研究人员使用弗兰克尔行为评分量表对患者注射后的行为进行评估。结果:采用两种方法注射后,25 名患者的弗兰克尔行为评分均为 4 分。对传统方法反应消极的患者在采用 NumBee 注射后的评分为 2 分(P=0.035)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry 3000
Dentistry 3000 Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信