The "judicialization" of emergency management in Belgium: From a safety regime toward a security one.

Q3 Medicine
Colin Glesner, Catherine Fallon
{"title":"The \"judicialization\" of emergency management in Belgium: From a safety regime toward a security one.","authors":"Colin Glesner, Catherine Fallon","doi":"10.5055/jem.0738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper analyzes changes in emergency management in Belgium that have accompanied growing security concerns in Western countries since the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States. Using an instrumentation approach, we show how the adoption of a particular regulatory instrument helped put police and judicial actors center stage and gave a more prominent place to the inquiry. We show how the instrument is hampering cooperation, communication, and trust in rescue services and may undermine the collective intelligence at the core of emergency responses. We argue that these changes are indicators of the rise of a new \"emergency management security regime\" that contradicts the original safety regime applied since the 1960s.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":"21 6","pages":"539-555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes changes in emergency management in Belgium that have accompanied growing security concerns in Western countries since the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States. Using an instrumentation approach, we show how the adoption of a particular regulatory instrument helped put police and judicial actors center stage and gave a more prominent place to the inquiry. We show how the instrument is hampering cooperation, communication, and trust in rescue services and may undermine the collective intelligence at the core of emergency responses. We argue that these changes are indicators of the rise of a new "emergency management security regime" that contradicts the original safety regime applied since the 1960s.

比利时应急管理的 "司法化":从安全制度走向安保制度。
本文分析了自美国 9/11 恐怖袭击事件以来,伴随着西方国家对安全问题的日益关注,比利时在应急管理方面所发生的变化。我们使用工具方法,说明了特定监管工具的采用如何帮助将警察和司法人员置于中心位置,并将调查放在更加突出的位置。我们展示了该工具如何阻碍了救援服务中的合作、沟通和信任,并可能破坏作为应急响应核心的集体智慧。我们认为,这些变化表明一种新的 "应急管理安全制度 "正在兴起,它与 20 世纪 60 年代以来实施的原有安全制度相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信